THIS JOURNAL IS ON 65 FAVORITE JOURNAL LISTSHonor: 0 [ Give / Take ]
1 entry this month
Your thoughts, please?17:47 Aug 24 2010
Times Read: 923
Another thing that a lot of people don't understand is, well at least from my understanding and experience, that there is really no such thing as a sang or a psi. In vampirism, you can feed any way, because it all has to do with energy. I suppose people just prefer the titles because it shows their preference. But have you ever met a sang who enjoyed drinking blood from a cup more than straight from the person's skin? I would hope not. It's because they are taking in the life force energy of that person as well. There are so many ways to feed it is unimaginable. Blood, sex, emotions, nature, the excess energy left from large crouds, all is part of an energy stream that we can manifest from. One of the hardest things for me to learn was that everything in this world, and outside of it, is energy. Why? Because think of the first thing that was in the universe, the atom, and we should all know from general knowledge that the atom was formed through energy, and energy is what caused it to expand and make it the universe that it is today. We, as vampires, have the ability to manipulate energy to do many things. Basically what I am getting at is, with enough training and will power, the world could be in your hands.
RECENT JOURNAL POSTS
Great Sire (111)
Leech (2)
Great Sire (113)
REAL VAMPIRES LOVE VAMPIRE RAVE
Vampire Rave is a member of
Page generated in 0.068 seconds.
COMMENTS
-
LordRazr
19:31 Aug 24 2010
Very true I couldn't agree more *grins
specter
08:08 Aug 30 2010
That's a pretty intelligent and visionary statement for someone so young. Maybe you are just an old soul??
Shhh - Don't look now but your imaginary past, you know the one there is a lack of real proof of and therefore don't believe in any more... it's showing.
You might want to tuck it back in before any one sees it!!
michen
20:59 Sep 11 2010
Lumping things into categories must have proven to be an evolutionary benefit - and taking the complexity of nature into account it is merely a logical conclusion. Basically it boils down to seeing differences in things and thoughts, so I believe differentiating between both is valid, yet unneccesary.. as you have pointed out so matter-of-factly.
FatherJP
20:49 Mar 12 2011
Very nice and I believe the same as you posted but get in trouble because many in the community don't want to believe it and seem to like to limit themselves.