Honor: 0 [ Give / Take ]
18 entries this month
Please! Refrain from your hyperactive and irrational behaviour!13:50 Feb 24 2017
Times Read: 119
By Stanley Collymore
Please, don’t tell me what you think I want to hear, and while
we’re on the subject let me make it absolutely clear that you
adopting such a position like that does nothing to clarify
the authentic situation of this embryonic relationship
between the two of us and, in its place, either raises
undue expectations which realistically can not be
fulfilled or else simply rather prematurely and
even needlessly kills off those that if considered objectively
and given the time, effort and the opportunity in obviously
appreciable circumstances to possibly succeed, logically
can be. But because of the manifestly irrational manner
in which you’re behaving quite clearly aren’t allowed
the likelihood to, since for you to cooperatively do
so would, instinctively on your part, be explicitly
looked upon as anathema to me and therefore
as something that’s not only as completely
thankless an assignment as they come but
also and ominously even singled out as
detrimental to this shared but entirely
new relationship that we’re having.
Well let me in response to that attitude be perfectly honest
and forthright with you and in addition from a personal
point of view candidly say that your second guessing
of what I’m supposedly thinking is something you
must without any delay refrain from doing, as it’s
entirely unbecoming in every conceivable way
of any purportedly consequential and adult
relationship that two prudent and rational
people could possible share, and unquestionably from
my perspective of the kind you evidently would like
for us to be establishing. For whatever conclusions
you arrive at in such an unconventional situation
is forthrightly, when all is said and done, mere
speculation, and so is neither the appropriate
basis nor any guarantee either that it bears,
or will ever do, any similitude to reality,
or as I anticipate it effectively serve as
a relevant catalysis for an established
relationship, if things were to carry
on uninterruptedly and put bluntly
as they presently and glumly are
with you, between you and me.
© Stanley V. Collymore
20 February 2017.
Author’s remarks:
It’s both a safe bet and a massive understatement too to say that significant numbers of individuals globally who either knowingly or else unintentionally but all the same pleasurably get caught up in a one-to-one personal and emotional relationship with another person, normally, if not always initially to start with, expect from their mutual association with each other the kind of enlivening, heartening and reassuring satisfaction commensurate, they feel, imperative to achieve and would therefore like to unrestrictedly realize from voluntarily engaging both empathetically and intimately with that specific and exceptionally special person on whom they’re completely depending on to fulfil their innermost and even undisclosed expectations.
Wishful thinking on the part of some who would earnestly like for these deeply felt and often treasured expectations to be endorsed and fulfilled, in the process of this happening, through the mechanisms of this entirely new, propitious and decidedly intimate association that, as things stand, both individuals are beneficially having. That said though, appearances can often be unreliable in the perception they convey, and in the worst case scenario be cruelly deceiving to those who invest their complete trust and immense time and effort in them.
Then there are those who have no compunction whatsoever in cynically or callously exploiting the touching faith placed in them by others for their own perverse ends, and doing so regardless of the psychological harm they occasion to those who’re involved and intentionally put on the receiving end of their heartlessness as well as their endemic selfishness. But, of course, none of this is ever going to stop people from falling in love or speculatively hoping that things turn out as they would like for them to be; as love isn’t just a romantic experimentation it can also be a mug’s game, and which category you let yourself fall into is, I’m afraid, a matter that’s totally up to you and I would presume of your own choosing. And if not, it’s too complex a pursuit, which honestly you shouldn’t seriously be involved in!
Stuff Donald J. Drumpf the US President and fuck you Hillary Rodham Clinton the aspirant one!
14:33 Feb 18 2017
Times Read: 132
By Stanley Collymore
Thankfully as a British citizen, not some bloody subject and a
terminology so beloved by significant numbers of inured
morons who infest my country the United Kingdom, I
couldn’t, nor would I ever have done even if I had
the dubious honour of doing so, have voted for
any of the US presidential candidates and far
less so the two major ones: a narcissistic,
intensely self-absorbed and white male,
racist, immigrant on all sides ancestry
bum pitted against a warmongering, embedded in the financial
pockets of the neo-cons, graspingly avaricious and overall
western Military Industrial Complex the Goldman Sachs
and the range of other Wall Street sinisterly demented
Zionist, Yiddish scroungers, who avidly believe in
the evidently self-serving dictum that boastfully
lauds capitalist and private sector profits – in
other words unbridled greed – but when in
financial trouble and the shit hits the fan
through their unsurprising and innate
incompetence unashamedly switch
in their perverse and wholly sick
mindset to the conceited tenet
of we’re alright Jack in both
situations precept securely
based on the acceptance of a national government’s
evilly recommended, supported and legislatively
instituted taxpayers’ bale out consisting of a
socialist inspired and oh so conveniently
and hypocritically employed propped
up and even completely wiped off
the financial slate corporate debt.
An undiluted position emphatically and most enthusiastically
embraced and promulgated by the other major presidential
entrant and vainglorious aspirant in this political race: a
similarly hardnosed bigot who also isn’t above using
racism for her own ends, although unlike Donald J.
Drumpf’s blatant utilization of it doing so more
surreptitiously; but, even so and by any astute
and objective analysis, or definition of the
term, nevertheless represents a truly decidedly and piss
poor facsimile of a woman in the person of Hillary
Rodham Clinton – and had I been so unfortunate
on account of my birth to have been entitled
with official authorization embark on my
civic obligation with the preference of
voting for one of them: Herr Donald
Drumpf or the “I’m entitled to it”
Hillary Rodham Clinton, would
quite certainly have eschewed
that dubious honour and the
obvious poisoned chalice
undertaking, and most
categorically in such
a precise situation
I basically would
not have done!
© Stanley V. Collymore
18 February 2017.
Author’s Remarks:
The rank hypocrisies and blatant double standards surrounding the US presidential elections and following the installation of its new President and which are ricocheting on this side of the Atlantic are so perverse that I won’t insult my intellect nor waste my time discussing them. That’s for all the idiots involved and who are obsessed by them to discuss. I have my views on the matter but were I to start elucidating them in full it would take me writing non-stop to this time next year to enunciate them.
One question though that I’d like to posit. How the hell does someone with the German familial surname of DRUMP – changed of course as these rightwing sorts always do – which I’ve deliberately used in this poem and apart from himself and his father who were born in the United States have the sheer nerve and bloody gall in a country founded on Genocide and enforced Slavery and inundated with foreigners and those of foreign ancestry – in other words IMMIGRANTS - and where those indigenous inhabitants of the continent he’s in and doesn’t bear the name of these peoples’ ancestors, as the largely white, like Herr Drump’s European immigrant settlers changed it, oh and by the way all this without any consultation with or the consent of the people who actually owned that land and furthermore where these said indigenous peoples have no say in the immigration policies of their own homeland – think that he has the inalienable right to unilaterally say who the hell lives there because he’s been elected President of the USA.
I’d be honest with all of you and say that out of the two completely lost cases that were on show in that US presidential election I personally held my nose and wished that it was Donald instead of Hillary who won. And if he cleans up, as he said he would do, the stinking sewers that are Washington DC and Wall Street, then good for him as this urgently needs to be done; but with so many billionaires in his cabinet that’s as realistic a situation as going to the Vatican to ask for contraceptive counselling!
The ridiculous mind games of a narcissistic lover
14:00 Feb 16 2017
Times Read: 143
By Stanley Collymore
If as you say you’re reciprocally in love with someone and
additionally an quite ostentatiously make that personal
declaration of yours well known, why then do you
feel it incumbent on you and therefore necessary
too to demand of that allegedly special person
an unqualified explanation of, if and why it
is that that particular individual still loves
you? Since reciprocation, the noun form
of the adverb reciprocally that you’ve
openly and freely used in relation to this supposedly
special person, unquestionably means that you and
whoever it is that you’ve partnered with have of
your own volition voluntarily embarked on the
relationship you’re sharing. Which prompts
the obvious question then, and not least so
from the concerned perspective of this
involved person as well as the uneasy
opinion of anyone who’s vaguely in
the least interested in this clearly
narcissistic discourse that you
are pandering to about your
love; what the precisely is
it you’re trying to prove?
© Stanley V. Collymore
16 February 2017.
Author’s Comments:
Yes! There are sadomasochists involved in practically every aspect of everyday human life: persons wholly lacking in self-worth, devoid of any noticeable acquisition or demonstration of commonsensical behaviour much less so discernible intellectual acumen but, all the same, whose activities, both individually and collectively, can and do cause irreparable harm to those whom they overtly or even surreptitiously indulge their brainless, self-dependency leanings, wanton and avaricious yearnings along with their pernicious activities overall, gratifyingly with.
Personal indulgences you might say; and therefore are perfectly permissible among consenting adults in the privacy of their homes or private lives and certainly alright within the environs of a vibrant and progressive democracy and its objectively thinking and pragmatically practising citizens, in relation to what other people quite lawfully do with their lives inside that that country; and I wholeheartedly agree.
However when demented sadomasochism combines, I believe, with compulsive control-freakism, that’s altogether a wholly different matter regardless of what society that they emerge in and manage to ingratiate themselves in. For I firmly believe that in such vile and threatening situations they mustn’t, with their undercurrent of moral and societal aberrations and their attendant consequences, be so easily, glibly and broad-mindedly be accepted much less so encouraged.
Die lächerlichen Gedanken Spiele eines narzisstischen Geliebten
13:59 Feb 16 2017
Times Read: 144
Von Stanley Collymore
Wenn du sagst, du bist verliebt in jemanden und zusätzlich
eine ganz ostentatiously machen, dass persönliche Deklaration
von Ihnen bekannt, warum dann tun Sie fühlen Sie es
obliegt Ihnen und daher notwendig um diese angeblich
besondere Person zu verlangen eine unqualifizierte
Erklärung von, ob und warum es ist, dass diese
besondere Person noch liebt du? Seit der Hin-
und Herbewegung bildet sich das Substantiv
der Adverb reziprok, dass Sie haben offen
und frei in Bezug auf diese angeblich verwendet
besondere Person, zweifellos bedeutet, dass Sie und
wer auch immer es ist, mit dem du zusammenge-
arbeitet hast Ihre eigenen Willen freiwillig
begonnen auf der Beziehung, die Sie teilen.
Welche Eingabeaufforderungen die
offensichtliche Frage, und nicht
zuletzt aus der betroffenen
Perspektive beteiligten
Person sowie die
unruhigen Meinung von jedermann,
der vage ist mm wenigsten daran
interessiert narzisstischen
Diskurs, dass Sie Sind
über Ihre Liebe;
Was genau ist
es Sieversuchen
zubeweisen?
© Stanley V. Collymore
16. Februar 2017.
Kommentare des Autors:
Ja! Es gibt Sadomachochisten, die in praktisch jeden Aspekt des alltäglichen Menschenlebens involviert sind: Personen, die an Selbstwertlosigkeit fehlen, ohne jegliche spürbare Akquisition oder Demonstration von commonsensicalem Verhalten, viel weniger erkennbaren intellektuellen Scharfsinns, aber trotzdem, deren Tätigkeiten sowohl individuell als auch kollektiv sind , Kann und kann irreparable Schäden für diejenigen, die sie offen oder sogar heimtückisch ihre hirnlose, Selbständigkeit lehnen, mutwillige und geizige Sehnsüchte zusammen mit ihren verderblichen Aktivitäten insgesamt, erfreulich mit.
Persönliche Ablässe, die Sie sagen könnten; Und deshalb sind sie vollkommen zulässig, wenn sie sich in der Privatsphäre ihrer Wohnung oder ihres Privatlebens und sicherlich im Umfeld einer lebendigen und fortschrittlichen Demokratie und ihrer objektiv denkenden und pragmatisch praktizierenden Bürger in Bezug auf das, was andere rechtmäßig mit ihrem Leben tun, voll und ganz zulassen Innerhalb dieses Landes; Und ich stimme voll und ganz zu.
Aber wenn der sittenlose Sadomasochismus mit dem zwanghaften Kontrollfreakismus zusammenhängt, so ist das ganz und gar eine ganz andere Sache, und zwar unabhängig davon, in welcher Gesellschaft sie sich entwickeln, und in der Lage ist, sich einzuschmeicheln. Denn ich bin fest davon überzeugt, daß sie in solch abscheulichen und bedrohlichen Situationen, Mit ihrer Unterströmung der moralischen und gesellschaftlichen Verirrungen und ihrer damit verbundenen Konsequenzen, so leicht, schwebend und breitsthümlich akzeptiert werden.
Les jeux d'esprit ridicules d'un amant narcissique
13:59 Feb 16 2017
Times Read: 145
Par Stanley Collymore
Si, comme vous le dites, vous êtes réciproquement amour-
eux de quelqu'un et en outre, un tout ostentatoire faire que
personnel Déclaration de votre bien connue, pourquoi
alors vous pensez que cela vous incombe et donc
nécessaire trop pour exiger de cette personne
prétendument spéciale une explication sans
réserve de, si et pourquoi elle est que cet
individu particulier aime encore toi?
Depuis la réciprocité, la forme nominale
de l'adverbe réciproquement que vous avez
ouvertement et librement utilisé en relation avec ce
personne spéciale, signifie incontestablement que
vous et quels que soient vos partenariats avec
volontairement, s'est engagé sur la Relation
que vous partagez. Quels messages la
question évidente alors, et pas moins
de la perspective concernée de cette
Personne impliquée ainsi que les
Opinion de quiconque est vague-
ment en le moins intéressé par
ce Discours narcissique que
vous sont flatteurs à votre
amour; Ce que le précisé-
ment est ce que vous
essayez de prouver?
© Stanley V. Collymore
16 février 2017.
Commentaires de l'auteur:
Oui! Il y a des sadomachichistes impliqués dans pratiquement tous les aspects de la vie quotidienne: des personnes totalement dépourvues d'estime de soi, dépourvues de toute acquisition notable ou de démonstration de comportement commun, beaucoup moins discernables, mais dont les activités individuelles et collectives , Peuvent et causent un préjudice irréparable à ceux qu'ils proposent ouvertement, voire subrepticement, à leurs penchants sans cerveau, à leur dépendance à eux-mêmes, à leurs aspirations déloyales et avides, et à leurs activités pernicieuses dans l'ensemble, avec gratitude.
Indulgences personnelles, vous pourriez dire; Et sont donc parfaitement admissibles chez les adultes consentants dans l'intimité de leur foyer ou de leur vie privée et certainement bien dans les environs d'une démocratie dynamique et progressiste et de ses citoyens objectivement pensants et pragmatiquement pratiquants par rapport à ce que les autres font légalement avec leur vie À l'intérieur de ce pays; Et je suis tout à fait d'accord.
Cependant, quand le sadomasochisme dément combine, je crois, avec le contrôle-freakisme compulsif, c'est tout à fait une question tout à fait différente quelle que soit la société dans laquelle ils émergent et parviennent à s'intégrer. Car je crois fermement que dans ces situations viles et menaçantes, T, avec leur courant d'aberrations morales et sociétales et leurs conséquences qui en résultent, soient si facilement, légèrement et largement acceptées moins encouragées.
Mae'r gemau meddwl chwerthinllyd o gariad narcissistic
13:58 Feb 16 2017
Times Read: 146
Gan Stanley Collymore
Os fel y dywedwch eich bod naill a'r llall mewn cariad
â rhywun a hefyd yn eithaf ostentatiously gwneud
hynny personol datganiad o eiddo adnabyddus,
pam wedyn yn gwneud i chi yn teimlo ei
ddyletswydd arnoch chi ac felly nid
oedd angen hefyd i fynnu y person honnir
arbennigesboniad ddiamod o, os a pham ei fod
yw bod yr unigolyn arbennig yn dal wrth ei fodd
chi? Ers trefn ddwy ffordd, y ffurflen enw o'r
adferf yr ydych naill a'r llall fod i wedi
Defnyddir agored ac yn rhydd mewn
perthynas â hyn sôn, person arbennig, ddiamheuol
yn golygu eich bod ac pwy bynnag mae'n eich
bod wedi sefydlu partneriaeth ag gennych o
eich wirfodd cychwyn yn wirfoddol ar y
perthynas rydych chi'n rhannu. Pa
awgrymiadau y cwestiwn amlwg,
yna, ac nid yn lleiaf felly o
safbwynt dan sylw o hyn
ymwneud person hwnnw yn ogystal â'r
anesmwyth barn unrhyw un sy'n sydd
fras mewn y lleiaf diddordeb yn
hyn yn glir disgwrs narcissistic
eich bod yn porthi am eich
caru; beth yw'r union yw
mae'n eich bod yn
ceisio profi?
© Stanley V. Collymore
Chwefror 16, 2017.
Sylwadau Awdur:
Ie! Mae sadomachochists sy'n ymwneud â bron pob agwedd ar fywyd dynol bob dydd: personau gyfan gwbl ddiffygiol mewn hunan-werth, amddifad o unrhyw gaffaeliad amlwg neu arddangosiad o ymddygiad commonsensical llawer llai felly amlwg graffter deallusol ond, gyd yr un fath, y mae eu gweithgareddau, yn unigol ac ar y cyd , gallu ac yn achosi niwed anadferadwy i'r rhai y maent yn agored neu hyd yn oed llechwraidd fwynhau eu brainless, thueddiadau hunan-ddibyniaeth, anllad a yearnings avaricious ynghyd â'u gweithgareddau dinistriol ar y cyfan, gratifyingly gyda.
indulgences personol efallai y byddwch yn ei ddweud; ac felly yn berffaith ganiateir ymhlith oedolion sy'n cydsynio ym mhreifatrwydd eu cartrefi neu eu bywydau preifat ac yn sicr iawn o fewn amgylchoedd o ddemocratiaeth fywiog a blaengar a'i dinasyddion meddwl yn wrthrychol ac yn bragmataidd yn ymarfer, mewn perthynas â'r hyn mae pobl eraill yn eithaf gyfreithlon wneud gyda'u bywydau y tu mewn fod y wlad honno; ac yr wyf yn cytuno'n llwyr.
Fodd bynnag, pan sadomasochism demented yn cyfuno, yr wyf yn credu, gyda gorfodaeth rheolaeth-freakism, mae hynny'n gyfan gwbl yn fater hollol wahanol ni waeth pa gymdeithas y maent yn dod i'r amlwg mewn ac yn rheoli ei seboni eu hunain mewn. Canys yr wyf yn credu'n gryf bod mewn sefyllfaoedd ffiaidd ac yn bygwth y cyfryw maent yn mustn ' t, gyda'u islif o aberrations moesol a chymdeithasol a'u canlyniadau cynorthwyydd, fod mor hawdd, gyfeirio'n ysgafn ac eang gyda meddwl yn cael eu derbyn llawer annog llai felly.
A Dyke’s sexual preferences over heterosexuality? What an absurd insanity!14:51 Feb 14 2017
Times Read: 153
By Stanley Collymore
How could you be so churlish and insensitive towards me to act
as you’re doing now in relation to us having sex together and
regularly as was customary between the two of us knowing
perfectly well as you do that I’m exceedingly partial to
sexual intercourse, which is an obsession with me
when it relates to you, and as you’ve constantly
known, and no less so from the very start of
our mutually engaged in - both physically
and emotionally- sexually reciprocal,
turbulently hot blooded, no holds
barred and a most thoroughly
rewarding, carnal liaison?
You who from the very beginning of this sexual tryst that’s
been happening reciprocally between the two of us and
entirely enlivened by what we were jointly embarked
upon and joyfully experiencing; and what is more
most stimulatingly and delightfully with your
enthusiastic encouragement, unbridled and
comprehensive furtherance physically as
well as emotionally in relation to what
we were cooperatively doing while
additionally on your part you in your responsive
excitement knowingly and appreciatively but
also humorously dubbing me “Mr Semen”,
teasingly, in the process, saying that you
seriously couldn’t think of any better or
more appropriate way for two entirely
compos mentis, thoroughly sexually
willing and distinctly heterosexual
human beings to beyond all doubt
permanently cement a searingly
hot and ardent physical union
as that which was obviously
and naturally occurring in
analogous circumstances
relating to you and me.
All that, then to now completely out of the blue and most
irrationally after all the several years that you’ve been
voluntarily and reassuringly telling me and matching
your words with unstinting wantonness and wholly
unrestrained lust that you’ve become a dedicated
feminist and consequently in the process of this
theoretically enlightened transformation earnestly feel that
it’s both incumbent on you, and also imperative too, that
you switch to being a lesbian? No rational explanation
that I can see for this, far less so any consultation or
any deemed necessary with me, pertaining to this
oversight it would seem - and at this juncture in
your life of you being a mother and a wife –
of you wanting to and furthermore patently
desirous of turning into a bloody Dyke; a
done and thoroughly dusted finalization
on your egocentric part of a stringently
unilateral situation which leaves me
with an inconsolable broken heart,
and that’s supposed to be alright?
© Stanley V. Collymore
14 February 2017.
Author’s Remarks:
Doubtlessly there will be many who’ll sanctimoniously and viciously say and even actually firmly believe that it’s a woman’s inalienable and God-given right as well as her undoubted privilege to have a complete and absolutely unchallenged say and control not only over her body but also her legitimately implemented sexual relations and I wholeheartedly agree and fully endorse that statement, although doing so on thoroughly objective and logical grounds rather than absolutely and wholly implausibly, for me, of ever jumping gratuitously on any populous or irrationally unthinking bandwagon which expediently and supportably fits into the self-serving agendas and self-centred ends of the vociferous fraternity of inured Queers and Dykes with their own individual and/or collective axes to grind.
That said, however, when that identical even though hypothetically aforementioned woman voluntarily, knowingly, enthusiastically and avidly enters and subsequently wholeheartedly engages in what from the outset of that personal relationship was always intended to be and accordingly was energetically transformed into a reciprocally harmonious understanding of how they both seriously intended and keenly required for their shared association with each other to be, only for one half of that relationship to subjectively and without any foreknowledge to their partner of what they were contemplating, saw no requirement to acquaint their partner of what they were actually thinking far less so engage with them in any conversation or discussion over the matter now dividing them, but instead rather arbitrarily and unilaterally adopted a most determined and inflexible position over an issue with decidedly transforming consequences and even a profoundly detrimental character in relation to what had always previously and unquestionably been thought of and firmly acknowledged on both sides as an enduring and highly beneficial relationship.
Now this! Coming completely and most shockingly out of the blue and from someone who is a biological mother, always wanted to be, and most crucially within the conventional bounds – as it was self-confidently emphasized and quite unambiguously understood at the time – of a relationship founded entirely on the principles of heterosexuality. So why should treachery, for that’s what it is, and particularly in such circumstances be rewarded with submissive indulgence?
Die sexuellen Vorlieben eines Dykes gegenüber Heterosexualität? Was für ein absurder Wahnsinn!14:50 Feb 14 2017
Times Read: 154
Von Stanley Collymore
Wie konntest du so chorlisch und unempfindlich gegen mich
sein, um zu handeln wie Sie jetzt in Bezug auf uns Sex
zusammen und tun regelmäßig, wie es zwischen uns
beiden üblich war perfekt so, wie du das machst,
ich bin sehr teuer Geschlechtsverkehr, der eine
Obsession mit mir ist wenn es sich auf Sie bezieht,
und wie Sie ständig bekannt, und nicht weniger von
Anfang an unsere gegenseitig engagiert - sowohl
physisch und emotional-sexuell gegenseitig,
turbulent heißblütig, kein Halt Gesperrt
und am gründlichsten Lohnende,
fleischliche Verbindung?
Sie, die von Anfang an dieses sexuelle tryst das ist
von völlig belebt durch das, was wir gemeinsam
begonnen hatten auf und freudig erleben; Und
was mehr ist anregend und herrlich mit ihrem
enthusiastische Ermutigung, ungezügelte
und umfassende Förderung physisch als
wie emotional in Bezug auf was wir
waren kooperativ dabei zusätzlich
auf ihrem Teil Sie in Ihrem responsive Aufregung
wissentlich und anerkennend aber auch humorvoll
synchronisiert mich "Herr Semen", neckend, in
dem Prozess, sagen, dass Sie Ernsthaft konnte
nicht besser denken oder besser geeignet für
zwei völlig Compos mentis, gründlich
sexuell willig und deutlich heterosexuell
Menschen über alle zweifel hinaus
Dauerhaft zementieren Heiße und
leidenschaftliche körperliche
Vereinigung als das, was
offensichtlich war und
natürlich vorkommend
in Analogen Umständen
in Bezug auf Sie
und mich.
All das, damals völlig aus dem Blauen heraus und am meisten
irrational nach all den Jahren, die Sie gewesen sind
freiwillig und beruhigend erzählend mir und
zusammenpassend Ihre Worte mit unerschütterlichem
Mutlosigkeit und ganz ungebremste Lust, dass Sie ein
engagierter geworden feministisch und folglich in
dem Prozess von diesem theoretisch erleuchtete
Transformation ernsthaft das Gefühl, dass
es ist sowohl Ihnen obendrein, als auch
implizit, dass Sie zu einem Lesben
wechseln? Keine vernünftige Erklärung
dass ich dies sehen kann, weit weniger eine Konsultation
oder die für mich als notwendig erachtet werden wie es
scheint - und an dieser Stelle in ihr Leben von Ihnen
als Mutter und Frau - Von Ihnen wollen und weiterhin
patent sich in einen blutigen Deich verwandeln zu
wollen; ein Getan und gründlich abgestoßen
Finalisierung auf Ihrem egozentrischen
Teil einer streng einseitige Situation,
die mich verlässt mit einem untröstlich
gebrochenen Herzen, und das
soll in Ordnung sein?
© Stanley V. Collymore
14. Februar 2017.
Bemerkungen des Autors:
Zweifellos wird es viele geben, die scheinheilig und bösartig sagen und sogar tatsächlich fest davon überzeugt sind, dass es das unveräußerliche und gottgegebene Recht einer Frau und ihr unzweifelhaftes Privileg ist, ein vollkommenes und absolut unangefochtenes Sagen und Kontrollieren nicht nur über ihren Körper, sondern auch zu haben Ihre legitim umgesetzten sexuellen Beziehungen, und ich stimme dieser Aussage voll und ganz zu, obwohl sie dies auf gründlich objektiven und logischen Gründen anstatt absolut und völlig unplausibel für mich getan hat, jemals auf irgendeinen volkreichen oder irrational nicht denkenden Zug, der zweckmäßig und unterstützend passt, unentwegt zu springen In die Selbstdiensten und die selbstzentrierten Enden der Vociferous Brüderlichkeit von versuchten Queers und Deichen mit ihren eigenen individuellen und / oder kollektiven Achsen zu schleifen.
Das heißt aber, wenn diese identische, wenn auch hypothetisch erwähnte Frau freiwillig, wissentlich, enthusiastisch und eifrig eintritt und sich danach voll und ganz darum bemüht, von Anfang an persönliche Beziehung stets beabsichtigt zu sein und dementsprechend energetisch in ein wechselseitig harmonisches Verständnis verwandelt wurde Wie sie beide ernsthaft beabsichtigt und scharf für ihre gemeinsame Zugehörigkeit zueinander nötig gewesen waren, nur für die Hälfte dieser Beziehung zu subjektiv und ohne jegliche Kenntnis ihres Partners von dem, was sie betrachteten, keine Notwendigkeit sahen, ihren Partner von dem zu erkennen, was sie waren Dachte viel weniger daran, sich mit ihnen in irgendeiner Konversation oder Diskussion über die jetzt geteilte Frage zu beschäftigen, sondern stattdessen eher willkürlich und einseitig eine entschiedenste und unflexible Haltung gegenüber einer Frage einzusetzen, die die Konsequenzen entscheidend veränderte und sogar einen tief greifenden Charakter hatte Was immer vorher und unzweifelhaft von beiden Seiten als dauerhafte und äußerst nützliche Beziehung gedacht und anerkannt wurde.
Jetzt das! Vollkommen und schrecklich aus dem Blauen und aus einer biologischen Mutter zu kommen, wollte immer und am entscheidendsten innerhalb der herkömmlichen Grenzen - wie sie damals selbstbewusst betont und eindeutig verstanden wurde - einer vermittelten Beziehung Ganz auf den Grundsätzen der Heterosexualität. Warum also Verrat, denn das ist, was es ist, und vor allem in solchen Umständen mit submissive Nachsicht belohnt werden?
Oxford University - Lone Wolf Attentäter dringend erforderlich!
16:03 Feb 08 2017
Times Read: 162
Von Stanley Collymore
Es nennt sich das Licht des Lernens und die Verantwortlichen
es, beauftragt, so zu sein, und die dann arrogant und eifer-
süchtig zu ihrem unverschämten Egoismus führen, ihre
angeborenen und verderblichen Vorurteile zu fördern;
eifrig und fixiert an ihren teilnehmen nepotistisch,
soziopathisch, psychopathisch und Pädophilen
und Sex-for-Grad Abschlüsse offensichtlich
in der Linie mit ihrer wahnhaften Wahrnehmung von
selbst als die Crème de la crème nicht nur der Coterie
von privilegierten, weißen Rassisten, Supremacists
und Ausnahme-Experten, denen sie verpflichtet
und stolz sind; Die führenden Lichter, wie sie
sehen sich gegenüber der britische soziale
und intellektuelle Szene, und auch und
natürlich für sie, wie sie zweifellos
glauben, die sowohl in Bezug auf
würdiggesellschaftliche Grund-
sätze und dieGeist ihrer Wahr-
nehmung von suave Intellek-
tualität obligatorisch nicht
nur Großbritannien aber
gleichermaßen auch die
ganze weiß westlich
und urbane Menschheit.
Und darum als objektiv hineinschauen pervers, verdreht,
narzisstisch, völlig subjektiv und völlig eindimensionale
Konzeptualisierung von ihnen schnell verstehen,
warum es so ist diese egozentrischen, voll von
sich selbst, schrecklich aus der Berührung
mit der Realität und Schlacke Oxford
University Moronen und Lowlife
Abschaum kann nichts unterscheiden
falsch in dem, was sie willentlich
und immer wieder, obwohl in
den am deutlichsten verdorbenen, abscheuliche
Mode und unerträglich Umstände, fröhlich
auf tun; Niemals die schädlichen, Zer-
brechlich nachteilig und langfristige
Auswirkungen, die Oxford Unive-
rsität betrügerische und kriminell
vorgeschlagen und seine spätere
Meister Bewusst Platziert und
grob abstoßende Handlungen
haben auf jene an das scharfe
Ende von Sie; und für wen
sie würden war immer
wissentlich beabsichtigt.
© Stanley V. Collymore
8. Februar 2017.
Bemerkungen des Autors:
Es gibt ein ziemlich fehlgeleitetes, völlig gedankenverlorenes und falsch verstandenes Missverständnis, weil etwas seit einiger Zeit und manchmal auch jahrhundertelang vorbei ist, dass jene spezifische Entität, die in der ganzen Zeit mit ihren Vorurteilen und unheilverkündenden Träumereien einverleibt ist Des Lebens und die wiederum von den damaligen Eliten ermutigt, verstärkt, konsolidiert und aktiv gefördert worden sind, die arrogant und sogar verächtlich zu dem Schluß gelangen, daß sie keinerlei Erklärungen schuldig sind, noch dazu eine Verpflichtung gegenüber ihnen Die sie einseitig, eigennützig und unbesonnen lieben, ihre einseitig gezeichneten, tief verankerten und zuversichtlich inspirierten persönlichen Interessenverpflichtungen gegenüber haben und mit denen sich die genannten Interessengruppen rasch und engagiert auseinandersetzen, Sobald ihre individuellen, gemeinsamen und stets wechselseitig vorteilhaften und überwältigenden Bedürfnisse mit den gelegentlich relevanten Anforderungen intervenieren, gut versorgt werden.
Keine erkennbare Anerkennung durch irgendwelche von ihnen während irgendeines dieser, in psychologisch viel weniger so im konkreten entweder, ehrenhaft vorschlagen oder sehen die grundlegende Anforderung ihrerseits für jede Konsultation oder einen notwendigen Dialog zwischen sich und denen, die sie schnell und patronisierend entlassen Als absolut unverdient einer solchen Annäherung oder Achtung, und instinktiv betrachten als vollendet unter ihnen intellektuell, physisch und in jeder denkbar gesellschaftlichen und zivilisierten Weise.
Dies ist, um es unverblümt zu formulieren, genau so, wie die Oxford University mit ihrer kühleren schädlichen und elitären Denkweise seit ihrer Gründung operiert hat; Und besonders gut zu verwenden und zu manipulieren diejenigen, die entweder idiotisch oder selbst-servingly conned wurden oder überzeugt, sich mit seinen eindämmenden Praktiken auszurichten, hat es geschafft, eine fast unzerstörbare Kette über die Jahre und Jahrhunderte der eindringlichen und im Wesentlichen bösen Kult-Verehrer zu schaffen, Nicht unähnlich von den Freimaurern, die eifrig dafür sorgen, dass diejenigen ihrer Art gut versorgt und gekoppelt mit dem Mythos der intellektuellen und zivilisierten Größe der Universität von Oxford sind, in einer Vielzahl von Wegen, die das gesamte Gewebe der britischen Gesellschaft umfassen, erheblich verzerrt und sogar irreparabel beschädigt wurden.
So vorauszusetzen und schlimmsten noch immer fest, sich selbst verpflichtet, die asinine Konzept, dass, weil etwas hat sich für eine lange Zeit und vor allem, wenn diese Einheit hat während ihrer gesamten Existenz absolut nichts gemacht, und darüber hinaus arrogant fühlt, dass es nicht zu haben , Auf die relevanten und dringenden Bedürfnisse der Gesellschaft oder der Nation, die sie heuchlerisch anpasst, und durch ihre eklatanten Doppelstandards zu dienen, ist nicht nur der Hirntod, der leichtgläubig von verlogenen manipulierten Dorfidioten wie SIE verzehrt wird, sondern auch zu dem unaufrichtigen Mantra des Privilegierte Eliten und ihre toadying Art, die entweder reichlich von den krassen Privilegien profitieren, die Oxford Universität zu seinen Kultgebotern abgibt oder die, die bestrebt sind, ein Teil dieses spürbar moribund, gewöhnlich korrupten, offen und prätentiell lowlife, Abwasserspeicher zu werden.
Université d'Oxford - Lone wolf assassin urgent!
16:02 Feb 08 2017
Times Read: 163
Par Stanley Collymore
Elle s'appelle elle-même le phare de l'apprentissage et les
responsables elle, chargée de l'être, et qui donc arrogante-
vaingloriously l'exécuter pour adapter à leur égoïsme
insolent, favorisent leurs préjugés pernicieux et
enracinés; Assidu et fixement participent à
leur Népotique, sociopathique, psychopathique et
un pédophile abusif et un agresseur sexuel pour-
degrés indulgences évidemment en ligne avec
leur perception délirante de crème de la
crème non seulement de la Coterie
de privilégiés, racistes blancs,
suprématistes exceptionnels auxquels ils
se sont engagés et hautement appartiennent;
les principaux phares, comme ils envisagent
eux-mêmes Scène sociale et intellectuelle
britannique, et naturellement pour eux,
comme ils croient incontestablement
pivot à la fois en termes de digne
principes sociétaux et la esprit de
leur perception de douce
intellectualité obligatoire non
seulement pour Bretagne
mais également aussi
l'ensemble des blanc
occidental et urbain
humanité.
Et donc comme un objectivement regardant
sur ce pervers, tordus, narcissiques, totalement
subjectifs et une conceptualisation entièrement
unidimensionnelle d'entre eux comprennent
rapidement pourquoi c'est ces égocentriques,
pleins d'eux-mêmes,terriblement hors de
contact avec la réalité et de l'université
d'Oxford Morons et scories ne peut
discerner rien faux dans ce qu'ils
délibérément et de façon récurrente, bien que
dans le plus observablement dépravé, Mode
abominable et insupportable Circonstances,
se lancer joyeusement faire; Jamais
l'esprit délétère, Écrasement
désavantageux et Effets à
long terme que Oxford
frauduleuses de
l'Université
criminellement
proposé et
son maître par la suite
Délibérément
Placé et grossièrement
Actions répugnantes
Avoir sur ceux à
L'extrémité pointue de
leur; et pour
Qu'ils auraient
toujours été
sciemment
prévu.
© Stanley V. Collymore
8 février 2017.
Remarques de l'auteur:
Il y a un malentendu, tout à fait erroné, entièrement sous-estimé et mal accepté que parce que quelque chose a été autour pendant un certain temps considérable, et même occasionnellement pendant des siècles, que cette entité spécifique enracinée dans ceux impliqués pendant tout ce temps et rempli de leurs préjugés et travestis calamiteux De la vie et qui, à leur tour, ont été encouragés, renforcés, consolidés et activement promus par les élites au moment où, arrogante et même dédaigneusement, considèrent et ne semblent pas devoir expliquer aucune sorte d'allégeance à ceux-là À qui ils se sont unilatéralement engagés unilatéralement, s'engagent unilatéralement, profondément enracinés et inspirés avec confiance, à s'engager personnellement et avec qui les groupes d'intérêts spéciaux susmentionnés s'accordent rapidement et fermement à ce que rien d'autre ne doive être évalué ou Prises en considération par eux tant que leurs besoins individuels, conjoints et constamment réciproquement bénéfiques et écrasants, avec les exigences occasionnellement pertinentes intervenant, sont bien pris en compte.
Aucune reconnaissance discernable par aucun d'entre eux au cours de tout cela, psychologiquement beaucoup moins en termes concrets soit, honorablement suggérer ou voir l'exigence fondamentale de leur part pour toute consultation ou un dialogue requis entre eux et ceux qu'ils rapidement et condescendante rejeter Comme absolument indignes d'une telle approche ou d'un tel respect, et qui, instinctivement, les considèrent comme consommant sous leurs ordres intellectuellement, physiquement et sous toutes les formes sociales et civilisées imaginables.
C'est précisément la façon dont l'Université d'Oxford, avec son esprit pernicieux et élitiste, a fonctionné depuis sa création; Et particulièrement bonne à utiliser et à manipuler ceux qui ont été soit idiotement ou auto-servie escroqués ou persuadés de s'aligner avec ses pratiques odieuses, a réussi à créer une chaîne presque indestructible au cours des années et des siècles d'adorateurs culpabilité et essentiellement mauvais, Non dissemblables des Maçons, qui s'assurent assidûment que ceux de leur sorte sont bien pris en charge et couplé avec le mythe de l'Université d'Oxford intellectuelle et la grandeur civilisée ont nettement déformé et même irrémédiablement endommagé dans une multiplicité de façons tout le tissu de la société britannique.
Donc, en supposant et pire encore encore fermement s'engager soi-même au concept asinine que parce que quelque chose a été autour depuis longtemps et surtout quand cette entité a tout au long de son existence tout fait absolument rien, et en plus arrogante estime qu'il n'a pas à , De s'adapter aux besoins pertinents et urgents de la société ou de la nation hypocritement et par son double critère flagrant sert à servir n'est pas seulement drivel cérébrale gullible consommé par des idiots du village manipulés mendacous comme vous, mais également le mantra faux de la Des élites privilégiées et de leur espèce de toadying qui bénéficient soit somptueusement des privilèges grossiers que l'Université d'Oxford distribue à ses supplicants cultes, soit ceux qui aspirent à faire partie de ce dépôt d'égouts perceptiblement moribond, habituellement corrompu, ouvertement et prétentieusement pauvre.
Prifysgol Rhydychen - llofrudd blaidd Lone hangen ar frys!
16:01 Feb 08 2017
Times Read: 164
Gan Stanley Collymore
Mae'n galw ei hun yn y ffagl dysgu a'r rhai sy'n gyfrifol am
iddo, y dasg o fod mor, ac sydd wedyn yn arrogantly a
vaingloriously redeg i ddiwallu eu egotism insolent,
meithrin eu rhagfarnau rhan annatod a niweidiol;
ddiwyd ac fixatedly gymryd rhan yn eu
nepotistic, sociopathic, seicopathig ac
bedoffilydd camdriniol inured a rhyw-gyfer-
graddau indulgences amlwg yn unol
gyda'u canfyddiad rhithdybiol o
eu hunain fel y crème de la crème, nid yn unig o'r
coterie o freintiedig, pobl hiliol gwyn, supremacists
a exceptionalists y maent yn committedly
ac haughtily perthyn; y goleuadau arwain, fel y
maent yn rhagweld eu hunain o'i gymharu â'r
bywyd cymdeithasol a deallusol Prydain,
a hefyd ac yn naturiol iddynt hwy, fel y
maent yn ddiamheuol yn credu, y
colyn o ran deilwng egwyddorion
cymdeithasol aysbryd eu
canfyddiad o intellectuality
suaveorfodol nid yn
unig i Prydain ond
yr un mor hefyd
y cyfan o gwyn
gorllewinol
ac urbane
ddynoliaeth.
Ac am hynny fel un wrthrychol yn edrych i mewn
ar hynwrthnysig, dirdro, narcissistic, hollol oddrychol
ac conceptualization yn llawn un-dimensiwn
sydd ganddynt yn gyflym yn deall pam ei bod
yn bod mae'r rhain egocentric, yn llawn
ohonynt eu hunain, ofnadwy allan o
gysylltiad â realiti a sothach Prifysgol
Rhydychen morons a llysnafedd chynullis
Ni all ddirnad unrhyw beth anghywir
yn yr hyn maent yn fwriadol ac yn
cylchol, er yn y rhan fwyaf o
observably depraved, ffasiwn
ffiaidd ac annioddefol amgylchiadau,
siriol gychwyn ar wneud; heb sôn
am y andwyol, crushingly anfanteisiol
a effeithiau tymor hir sy'n Rhydychen
Brifysgol twyllodrus a arfaethedig
yn droseddol a ei dilyn hynny
feistr meddwl, yn fwriadol
gosod ac ofnadwy camau
gweithredu gwrthyrru
ei gael ar y rhai sydd
mewn y rheng flaen
iddynt; ac ar gyfer
y maent Byddai'n
well bod bob amser
yn fwriadol fwriadwyd.
© Stanley V. Collymore
Chwefror 8, 2017.
Sylwadau Awdur:
Mae 'na gamsyniad hytrach gyfeiliornus, yn gyfan gwbl tanysgrifio ddifeddwl at a derbyniwyd dimwittedly hynny oherwydd bod rhywbeth wedi bod o gwmpas ers cryn amser, a hyd yn oed yn achlysurol ers canrifoedd, bod y endid penodol yn rhan gynhenid rhai sy'n gysylltiedig dros yr holl amser hwnnw ac replete gyda'u rhagfarnau a travesties drychinebus o fywyd a bod yn eu tro wedi eu hunain yn cael eu hannog, eu hatgyfnerthu, cyfnerthu ac yn mynd ati a hyrwyddir gan y elites ar y pryd a arrogantly a hyd yn oed disdainfully yn eu hystyried ac nid yw'n syndod i'r casgliad eu bod yn ddyledus unrhyw esboniad o unrhyw fath nac, yn dod i hynny, unrhyw deyrngarwch i'r rhai y maent yn unochrog, hunan-servingly ac uncaringly arglwydd eu tanysgrifio unochrog i, ddwfn di-syfl a ysbrydolwyd yn hyderus, ymrwymiadau budd personol y grwpiau arbennig-ddiddordebau a grybwyllwyd eisoes yn gyflym ac yn committedly alinio eu hunain dros, a gyda phwy â, bod angen gwerthuso'r dim byd arall neu cymryd i ystyriaeth gan eu cyhyd â bod eu unigol, ar y cyd ac yn gyson naill a'r llall yn fuddiol ac yn llethol eisiau, â'r gofynion o bryd i'w gilydd berthnasol rhyngddynt, Darperir yn dda ar gyfer.
Dim cydnabyddiaeth amlwg gan unrhyw un ohonynt yn ystod unrhyw ran o hyn, yn seicolegol yn llawer llai felly mewn termau diriaethol chwaith, anrhydeddus awgrymu neu weld y gofyniad sylfaenol ar eu rhan ar gyfer unrhyw ymgynghori gyda neu deialog gofynnol rhyngddyn nhw a'r rhai y maent yn gwrthod yn gyflym ac yn patronizingly fel gwbl anhaeddiannol o unrhyw ddull neu barch o'r fath, ac yn reddfol yn ei ystyried yn consummately oddi tanynt yn ddeallusol, yn gorfforol ac ym mhob ffordd conceivably cymdeithasol a gwâr.
Mae hyn, i roi blwmp ac yn blaen, yn cael ei union sut mae Prifysgol Rhydychen gyda'i meddylfryd iasol dinistriol ac elitaidd wedi gweithredu erioed ers ei sefydlu; ac yn arbennig o dda wrth ddefnyddio a thrin y rhai sydd naill ai wedi bod idiotically neu hunan-servingly twyllo neu eu perswadio i alinio eu hunain gyda ei arferion annymunol, wedi llwyddo i greu cadwyn bron indestructible dros y blynyddoedd ac canrifoedd o addolwyr cwlt ingratiating ac yn ei hanfod drwg, nad yw'n annhebyg gan y Masons, hynny ddyfal sicrhau bod y rhai o'u math yn cael eu darpariaeth dda ar gyfer ac ynghyd â'r myth o fawredd deallusol a gwâr Prifysgol Rhydychen wedi hystumio sylweddol a hyd yn oed difrodi irreparably mewn nifer fawr o ffyrdd y ffabrig cyfan o gymdeithas ym Mhrydain.
Felly dybio a gwaethaf yn dal i ymrwymo hyd yn oed yn gadarn un hunan i'r cysyniad asinine bod oherwydd bod rhywbeth wedi bod o gwmpas ers amser hir ac yn arbennig felly pan fod endid wedi drwy gydol ei bodolaeth cyfan wneud dim byd o gwbl, ac ar ben hynny arrogantly teimlo nad oes ganddo i , i addasu i anghenion perthnasol a phwysig o'r gymdeithas neu'r genedl y mae'n rhagrithiol a thrwy ei safonau dwbl digywilydd honni ei gwasanaethu nid yn unig yn drivel ymennydd-marw a ddefnyddir gullibly gan idiots pentref trin mendaciously fel CHI ond yr un mor yn rhy mantra annidwyll y elites breintiedig ac mae eu caredig toadying sydd naill ai'n cael budd foethus o'r breintiau crass bod Prifysgol Rhydychen gweinyddu i'w erfyn cwlt neu'r rheiny sy'n dyheu i fod yn rhan o hynny perceptibly marwaidd, fel arfer llwgr, agored a pretentiously chynullis, ystorfa garthffos.
The consummately inveterate and unrepentant Slapper!
13:23 Feb 06 2017
Times Read: 170
By Stanley Collymore
Throughout my life, ever since I attained what beneficially as
it turned out for me was an early puberty, I’ve lasciviously
and rapaciously used sex and my swiftly accomplished,
advantageously embraced, masterfully and daringly
manipulatively, no-nonsense contributory and a
naturally equipped disposition attendant with
my utterly commanding, cum-avaricious
and immeasurably persuasive feminine
wiles, delectable coquettish flirtations and my
superficial but totally convincing promises
of giving unbridled sexual satisfaction to
every client of mine – whether man or
woman – to alluringly but decisively
from my standpoint exert and fully
achieve my personal demands or
requirements, and accordingly
devoid of all insinuation of
even the smallest amount
of compunction on my
utterly confident part
rather heartlessly, I
must confess, get
from each and
every one of
them what
so ever it
is I’ve in
mind to
request.
© Stanley V. Collymore
4 February 2017.
Author’s remarks:
Whether lawfully and consensually engaging in so-called moral and conventional acts of sex activity, be it just pleasurably so or is itself an act that’s more strictly and exclusively for procreation purposes, or else voluntarily, enthusiastically, lasciviously and accordingly wholeheartedly indulging in the most unbridled - solo or reciprocally participative with one’s consenting partner – and gratifying fashion in the act of sexual intercourse is from my perspective no one else’s business but those who’re personally involved.
However, when sex is purposely, premeditatedly and thoroughly calculatingly weaponized and then either unilaterally, subjectively, treacherously, cold-heartedly, emotionally and/or financially exploitatively utilized to create incalculable harm in and even detrimentally and uncaringly impair the lives of cruelly conned, unsuspecting or even gullible human targets - pre-planned or opportunistic ones - that’s an entirely different matter altogether and one that must therefore be ruthlessly stamped on whenever and by whomsoever it occurs.
And slappers fall squarely into this latter category of lowlife scum elements that regrettably form part of the human race. Even so that’s no excuse why they should be tolerated or what is more relevant allowed to exist.
Mae'r Slapper consummately inveterate a unrepentant!
13:23 Feb 06 2017
Times Read: 171
Gan Stanley Collymore
Drwy gydol fy mywyd, byth ers i mi ennill yr hyn fuddiol fel
mae'n troi allan i mi oedd yn glasoed cynnar, rydw i wedi
lasciviously a defnyddio rhyw rapaciously ac mae fy
medrus yn gyflym, cofleidio fanteisiol, feistrolgar
a beiddgar manipulatively, di-lol gyfrannol a
offer yn naturiol ydd gwarediad gyda fy
hollol awdurdodol, cum-avaricious ac
anfesuradwy perswadiol benywaidd Wiles,
flirtations coquettish hyfryd ac mae fy addewidion
arwynebol ond hollol argyhoeddiadol o roi boddhad
rhywiol penrhydd i bob cleient i mi - boed ddyn
neu wraig - i alluringly ond yn bendant gan fy
cryn safbwynt ac yn llawn cyflawni fy
galwadau personol neu gofynion, ac
yn unol â hynny amddifad o bob
ensyniad o hyd yn oed y swm
lleiaf o ddyletswydd arnaf fi
ar fy rhan hollol hyderus
yn hytrach heartlessly,
yr wyf yn Rhaid cyfad-
def, yn cael o bob un
a pob un o'r iddynt
beth felly erioed
mae'n yw Rwyf
wedi mewn
meddwl i
gais.
© Stanley V. Collymore
Chwefror 4, 2017.
sylwadau Awdur:
P'un ymgysylltu gyfreithlon ac mewn consensws mewn gweithredoedd moesol a chonfensiynol hyn a elwir o weithgaredd rhyw, boed yn jyst pleasurably hynny neu ei hun yn weithred sy'n fwy llym ac yn unig ar gyfer dibenion procreation, neu fel arall yn wirfoddol, yn frwdfrydig, lasciviously ac yn unol â hynny yn llwyr ymfoddhau yn y rhan fwyaf o penrhydd - unawd neu naill a'r llall gyfranogol gydag un partner cydsynio - ffasiwn a galonogol yn y weithred o gyfathrach rywiol yn dod o fy safbwynt unrhyw un busnes arall ond y rhai sydd yn ymwneud yn bersonol.
Fodd bynnag, pan fydd rhyw yn bwrpasol, premeditatedly ac yn drylwyr weaponized calculatingly ac yna naill ai unochrog, yn oddrychol, anffyddlon, oer-heartedly, yn emosiynol ac / neu ariannol exploitatively eu defnyddio i greu niwed anfesuradwy mewn a hyd yn oed andwyol ac uncaringly amharu ar fywydau twyllo greulon, diarwybod neu dargedau dynol hyd yn oed yn hygoelus - rhai wedi'u cynllunio ymlaen llaw neu oportiwnistaidd - dyna yn fater cwbl wahanol yn gyfan gwbl ac yn un y mae'n rhaid, felly, gael ei stampio yn ddidrugaredd ar pryd bynnag a chan bwy bynnag y mae'n digwydd.
A slappers syrthio blwmp i mewn i hyn categori olaf o elfennau llysnafedd chynullis sydd yn anffodus yn ffurfio rhan o'r hil ddynol. Hyd yn oed fel nad dim esgus pam y dylent ei oddef neu beth yn fwy perthnasol caniatáu i fodoli.
La putain constamment invétérée et impénitent!
13:22 Feb 06 2017
Times Read: 172
Par Stanley Collymore
Tout au long de ma vie, depuis que j'ai atteint ce il
s'est avéré pour moi était une puberté au début,
j'ai lascivement et le sexe rapacemment utilisé
et mon rapidement accompli, avantageusement
embrassé, maître et audacieux Manipulateur,
non-nonsense contributif et un Disposition
naturellement équipée mon absolument
commandant, cum-avare et féminin
incroyablement persuasif Flippers
coquettes délectables et mes
promesses superficielles
mais totalement convaincantes de donner une
satisfaction sexuelle débridée à chaque client –
que ce soit l'homme ou femme - à alluringly
mais décisivement de mon point de vue
exercer et pleinement satisfaire mes
exigences personnelles Exigences
et, en conséquence, dépourvu de
toute insinuation de même le
plus petit montant de compassion
sur ma Partie totalement con-
fiante plutôt sans cœur, je
dois avouer, obtenir de
chaque chacun de leur
quoi si jamais il est-
ce que j'ai l'esprit
pour demande.
© Stanley V. Collymore
4 février 2017.
Remarques de l'auteur:
Qu'elle soit légalement et consensuellement engagée dans des actes d'activité sexuelle dits morales et conventionnels, qu'elle soit simplement agréable ou qu'elle soit elle-même un acte plus strictement et exclusivement à des fins de procréation, ou volontairement, enthousiaste, lascifiquement et, par conséquent, Débridée - solitaire ou réciproquement participative avec son partenaire consentant - et la mode gratifiante dans l'acte sexuel est de mon point de vue personne d'autre, mais ceux qui sont personnellement impliqués.
Toutefois, lorsque le sexe est intentionnellement, avec préméditation et de calculer minutieusement arme, puis soit unilatéralement, subjectivement, traîtreusement, froidement, émotionnellement et / ou exploité financièrement utilisé pour créer un préjudice incalculable et même nuisible et indifférente nuire à la vie de cruellement connus, Ou même des cibles humaines crédules - pré-planifiées ou opportunistes - c'est tout à fait autre chose et qui doit donc être impitoyablement imprimée à tout moment et par qui que ce soit.
Et les chancelières tombent carrément dans cette dernière catégorie d'éléments de mauvaise vie qui font malheureusement partie de la race humaine. Même si ce n'est pas une excuse pourquoi ils devraient être tolérés ou ce qui est plus pertinent permis d'exister.
Die vollkommen eingefleischte und unwiderstehliche Schlampe!
13:21 Feb 06 2017
Times Read: 173
Von Stanley Collymore
Während meines ganzen Lebens, seit ich das, was vorteilhaft wie
erreicht es stellte sich heraus, für mich war eine frühe Pubertät,
ich habe lasziv und rapaciously verwendete Sex und meine
schnell vollendeten, vorteilhaft umarmte, meisterhaft
und kühn manipulativ, ohne Unsinn beitragen und
mein äußerst kommandativ, cumsüchtig und
unermesslich überzeugend feminin Wiles,
delectable kokette Flirts und meine
oberflächlich, aber völlig überzeugende Versprechen
der ungezügelten sexuellen Befriedigung zu geben
jeder Kunde von mir - ob Mann oder Frau - zu
verführerisch aber entscheidend von meinem
Standpunkt aus und voll meine persönlichen
Anforderungen erfüllen oder Anforderungen
und dementsprechend ohne Anmaßung
von völlig zuversichtlichen Teil
eher herzlos, ich muss gestehen,
bekommen von jedem und
jeder Hinsicht sie was
so immer es ist ich
in Geist zu
anfordern.
© Stanley V. Collymore
4. Februar 2017.
Bemerkungen des Autors:
Ob rechtmäßig und einvernehmlich in so genannte moralische und konventionelle Handlungen der Sexualtätigkeit, sei es nur genussvoll, oder ist es selbst eine Handlung, die streng und ausschließlich für Fortpflanzungszwecke oder freiwillig, enthusiastisch, lüstern und dementsprechend von ganzem Herzen schwelgt Ungebunden - solo oder gegenseitig partizipativ mit dem zustimmenden Partner - und erfreuliche Mode in der Tat des Geschlechtsverkehrs ist aus meiner Perspektive kein anderes Geschäft, sondern diejenigen, die persönlich beteiligt sind.
Wenn jedoch Sex gezielt, vorsätzlich und gründlich kalkuliert und dann entweder einseitig, subjektiv, verräterisch, kaltherzig, emotional und / oder finanziell ausbeuterisch genutzt wird, um unabsehbare Schäden herbeizuführen und sogar schädlich und unauffällig das Leben grausam verurteilter, ahnungsloser Menschen zu beeinträchtigen Oder sogar leichtgläubige menschliche Ziele - vorab geplante oder opportunistische - das ist eine ganz andere Sache ganz und die daher rücksichtslos auf, wann immer und von wem sie auftritt, stampfte.
Und Schläger fallen direkt in diese letztere Kategorie von Lowlife-Schaumelemente, die bedauerlicherweise einen Teil der menschlichen Rasse bilden. Auch das ist keine Entschuldigung, warum sie toleriert werden sollten oder was noch wichtiger ist.
The delusional imponderables occasioned by hating others13:33 Feb 02 2017
Times Read: 181
By Stanley Collymore
Hate is a controversial feeling and sometimes an ingrained
sentiment that directly affects and consequently can and
invariably does compulsively consume the everyday
lives of millions of infected individuals globally;
sometimes rationally it might seem in the eyes
of those who’re intensely affected with this
incapacitating syndrome and who might
think and certainly approve that what
they’re doing is simply natural and
therefore in their estimation of it
perceive as entirely fair; though not the same opinion
necessarily held or displayed by prescient-minded
and thoroughly conscientious onlookers who, in
marked contrast, might very well deduce, and
especially since the overwhelming majority
of them already know that this pernicious
and neurotic preoccupation is markedly
without a jot of commonsense or any
merit to it, see no logical reason to
support what is unquestionably a
comprehensively mindless and
detrimental fixation in which those who’re
individually engaged in it can’t rationally,
constructively or effectively cope with
in their private life far less so actually
defend; contend that in the end and
commensurate with the aftermath
of such abject failure which they
are faced with, these hopelessly
sad and deluded specimens of
the human race chose instead
to speculate about and even
disturbingly as a result talk
themselves into believing
the only substitute option
and remedial course for
them is to interminably
and unyieldingly hate.
© Stanley V. Collymore
31 January 2017.
Author’s Remarks:
Commonsense, intellectual acumen or ethical principles aren’t characteristics let alone prerequisites that readily spring to mind when it comes to hating others since all that’s required to do so in that regard is for the individual(s) involved to be in possession of a witless mindset that’s totally and even permanently ingrained in a brainless skull which precludes them from the ordinary process of thinking for themselves and which in turn makes them entirely incapable of either intelligently and objectively deducing, as one would ordinarily do in normal circumstances, what is basically factual and provable information and what clearly is not?
And what’s more, that is itself in relation to this obvious inability to think for one’s self, completely and permanently divorced from being able to deal competently, constructively and effectively with reality. That essentially has no concept of far less so the capability of independently and forensically examine whatever problems one is confronted or presented with and having been proactive and efficient in doing so to then positively and energetically embark in the most appropriate manner on requisite problem-solving solutions, while taking the utmost care and attention to satisfactorily ensure that that specific process of dealing with the issues involved not only lessen but also purposefully set out to eradicate, and does so, all prevailing misunderstandings and tensions, which if left unattended to could potentially give rise to even greater difficulties and increased conflict with its attendant harmful consequences.
Unfortunately however there are considerable numbers of people globally who because of their myriad innate inabilities, lack of self-worth that was profoundly ingrained in them from birth and then socially reinforced with inane bigotries and hatred, and which are themselves compounded by the development of an encouraged feral disposition within them, unthinking gullibility and a highly successful and even manipulative proneness to being easily mislead or brainwashed become and remain the grist to the mill of hate mongers who like nothing better that inducing hatred which they sumptuously thrive on – since its concerted deployment by them are relevant conduits, as undoubtedly perceived by them, that constitute the mechanism by which means they can and do achieve power and massive influence over others – use as a suitable vehicle to combat their detractors and adversaries, as well as a convenient and populist propaganda mode for fashioning and garnering massive amounts of wealth for themselves.
So which category of persons are you honestly in? That of a pernicious, mendacious and manipulative hatemonger or hopefully a conscionable, principled and a progressively thinking peace activist or one of their supporters concerned about the world that YOU live in, and very much wanting to make your personal and positive contribution towards making it a just, more equitable and a CIVILIZED one?
Les impondérables délirants occasionnés par la haine d'autres13:32 Feb 02 2017
Times Read: 182
Par Stanley Collymore
La haine est un sentiment controversé et parfois un sentiment
Sentiment qui affecte directement et par conséquent peut et
invariablement consomme compulsivement le quotidien
des millions de personnes infectées dans le monde;
parfois rationnellement il peut sembler dans les
yeux de ceux qui sont intensément touchés par
cette incapacitants et qui pourraient penser
et certainement approuver que ce quequ'ils font
est tout simplement naturel et donc dans leur estimation
de celui-ci Perçoit comme tout à fait juste; Mais pas le
même avis Nécessairement détenues ou affichées
par des et des spectateurs consciencieux qui, en
contraste marqué, pourrait très bien en déduire, et
d'autant plus que l'écrasante majorité d'entre
eux savent déjà que cette pernicieuse et la
préoccupation névrotique est nettement
sans un petit geste de bon sens ou
Mérite, ne voit aucune raison logique
ce qui est incontestablement untotalement sans
esprit et une fixation préjudiciable dans laquelle
ceux quiindividuellement engagé dans elle
ne peut pas rationnellement, de manière
constructive ou efficace dans leur vie
privée beaucoup moins défendre;
soutiennent qu'à la fin et à,
la mesure des conséquences d'une telle
défaillance abjecte sont confrontés à,
ces désespérément des exemples
tristes et illusoires la race humaine
a préféré spéculer sur et même
inquiétant, par conséquent,
parler mêmes à croire la
seule option de remplace-
mentCours de rattrapage
interminablement et
la haine inflexible.
© Stanley V. Collymore
31 janvier 2017.
Remarques de l'auteur:
Le sens commun, la sagesse intellectuelle ou les principes éthiques ne sont pas des caractéristiques, et encore moins des conditions préalables qui viennent aisément à l'esprit quand il s'agit de haïr les autres puisque tout ce qui est nécessaire pour le faire à cet égard est pour les individus impliqués d'être en possession d'un witless Mentalité qui est totalement et même définitivement enracinée dans un crâne sans cerveau qui les exclut du processus ordinaire de penser pour eux-mêmes et qui à leur tour les rend totalement incapables de déduire intelligemment et objectivement, comme on le ferait normalement dans des circonstances normales, ce qui est fondamentalement factuel Et les informations prouvables et ce qui n'est clairement pas?
Et ce qui est plus, c'est lui-même en relation avec cette incapacité évidente à penser pour soi-même, complètement et définitivement divorcé de pouvoir traiter avec compétence, de manière constructive et efficace avec la réalité. Cela n'a essentiellement aucune notion d'autant moins que la capacité d'examiner de façon indépendante et forensique les problèmes auxquels on est confronté ou présenté et d'avoir été proactif et efficace pour s'engager positivement et énergiquement de la manière la plus appropriée sur les solutions de résolution de problèmes requises, Tout en prenant le plus grand soin et en veillant à ce que ce processus spécifique de traitement des questions concernées non seulement diminue, mais vise également à éliminer et à faire disparaître tous les malentendus et tensions qui, s'ils sont laissés sans surveillance, À des difficultés encore plus grandes et à un conflit accru avec ses conséquences néfastes.
Malheureusement, il y a un nombre considérable de personnes à travers le monde qui, en raison de leurs innombrables innacités innombrables, leur manque d'estime de soi qui était profondément enracinée en elles dès leur naissance et socialement renforcé par des intolérances innées et la haine, Encouragé la disposition féroce en eux, la crédulité non pensante et une volonté très réussie et même manipulative d'être facilement tromper ou de lavage de cerveau deviennent et restent la graisse pour le moulin des marchands de haine qui n'aiment rien de mieux que l'induire la haine dont ils prospèrent somptueusement - Par eux sont des conduits pertinents, comme sans doute perçus par eux, qui constituent le mécanisme par lequel ils peuvent et font obtenir le pouvoir et l'influence massive sur les autres - utiliser comme un véhicule approprié pour lutter contre leurs détracteurs et adversaires, ainsi que pratique et populiste Mode de propagande pour façonner et recueillir des quantités massives de richesse pour eux-mêmes.
Dans quelle catégorie de personnes êtes-vous honnête? Celle d'une haine pernicieuse, mendiante et manipulatrice, ou, espérons-le, d'un militant de la paix consciencieux, plein de principes et progressivement réfléchie ou d'un de leurs partisans préoccupé par le monde dans lequel VOUS vivez et qui souhaite apporter votre contribution personnelle et positive pour en faire un Juste, plus équitable et un CIVILIZED?
A compulsive liar, thief and a born fantasist!
12:52 Feb 01 2017
Times Read: 183
By Stanley Collymore
You came into the world on 1st February 1958; an inauspicious
birth among one of three to a perennial drunken father and
a similarly inebriate mother who would subsequently
tragically die of cirrhosis of the liver. School, or
more importantly your attendance there, was
consequently and unsurprisingly given the particular family
circumstances that from your earliest childhood existence
you found yourself habitually growing up in, was never
ever going to be a requisite necessity much less so a
crucial priority either for your parents or you to
give any acknowledgement to, so apparently
and rather predictably, you were neither
encouraged by your parents nor from
your own perspective, assuming of
course you even knew what that
word meant, saw any pressing
need to attend; so naturally
you happily grasped that
consensual opinion to
heart and evidently
you rarely went.
Predictably from the very start of your puberty the
seemingly enticing sexual world of adulthood,
initially and curiously exposed by you then
soon afterwards keenly accommodated
on your part, rapidly ensnared your
passions and at sixteen and with
parental permission – clearly
from their point of view
one less mouth to feed and from yours the
desperate aspiration of finally escaping
a controlling and still consistently
inebriated woman as a mother
and an often drunk himself
but even so submissive
husband of hers as your biological father, and
when one added to this you going absolutely
nowhere either in social developmental or
even protected employment terms while
ongoingly as you saw it and possibly
forever so entrenched in a working
class area terraced council house
and what moreover was a demonstrably
dysfunctional and also noticeably a
debilitatingly oppressive home –
my reflection on the situation
not your own – you simply
got married! For having
queried the uncertain
wisdom of politely
putting up with more of the same
that you already had or actually
leaving home altogether your
responsive decision was
basically to earnestly
choose the latter
of these two
options.
An alternative arrived at more from the impulse
triggered by the desperation of your personal
situation rather than any motivation of real
love for the man who you married, since
as you well knew when you decided to
get involved with him that like your
father and mother, even though he
had the skilled knack of readily
turning the charm on at any
time that it suited him, he also was a heavy
drinker and quite discernible to someone
like you who had grown up in a house-
hold of drunkards an unmistakably in
denial alcoholic; yet quite bizarrely
you carried on your relationship
with your then lover, married
him and astonishingly and
of your own free volition
sedulously protected
him by maintaining
your firm silence
concerning his
intensive and
financially
crippling
drinking
habits.
But worse was to come for as with your mother drink
only brought out the worst in your husband and
with his obsessive jealousy that any man who
spoke to you no matter where or however
trivially so, or even glanced admiringly
at you either fancied you or you him
and therefore beating the hell out
of you when you got home was
an appropriate solution and
additionally a necessary deterrent to stopping you
being attractive, if not physically at least then
psychologically, to any man, your specific
experiment of leaving the family home
for one of your own clearly wasn’t
paying off as you’d hoped and
had even become more of a
terrible problem for you.
For in the interim you had become a mother
thrice over: giving birth to two girls: Cathy
and Tracey and the boy child that rather
fixatedly your husband always wanted.
But even the significance of being a
mother couldn’t or didn’t alleviate
your parlous situation; for your
son tragically died as a baby –
a random cot death incident;
however with his passing
blamed firmly on you by
his enraged father your
husband’s hedonistic
binge drinking and
periodic beatings
of you suddenly
became nastier
and a lot more
unpleasant in
their cruelty.
About this time you finally saw sense and considered having
a divorce, itself made easier by the fact that your husband
John seemingly wanted to get out of your marriage too.
He’d in the meantime got himself a mistress who
evidently craved much more than just being his
bit on the side and in addition to that for him
the irksome problem of all the accumulated
HP debts that you and he had jointly run
up coupled with child support for his
two daughters and maintenance for you who wasn’t working
didn’t the least bit rank favourably with what he generally
considered to be a worthwhile or profitable way for him
to be living, so he willingly consented to your starting
divorce proceedings against him, knowing full well
that by the time they in essence got underway he
and his girlfriend, who apparently came from
the north of England, would long and quite
permanently have departed from the area
of your marital residence that consisted
of the absolutely charming and rather
pleasant Berkshire town of Reading;
making it quite unfeasible with his
whereabouts distinctly unknown
for him to be logically pursued
by the courts in any resolute
fashion for either for child
support God forbid his ex
wife’s maintenance that
he had no intention at
all of ever of paying.
There are all sorts of mysterious reasons that baffle
questioning minds as to why completely out of
the blue things suddenly happen, and your
accidentally meeting at a local bus stop
Pauline, on account of a late bus that
on its ultimate arrival would then
take both of you into Reading’s
town centre where somewhat
coincidentally the two of you were independently
heading, an unfamiliar man that as it happened
lived just one hundred yards distance from
where your home was but who previously
you hadn’t met, were unknown to each
other and accordingly were what you
would call archetypal strangers but
all the same following that chance
meeting between the two of you
would fatefully, spectacularly
and markedly constructively in every possible
way change for the infinite better not only
your patently muddled life Pauline and
your gloomy outlook on it but equally
the lives, potential and expectations
of both your daughters: eight and
four years old then, and which
providentially for all three of
you would turn out to be
unquestionably one of
life’s truly amazing
and unsurprisingly
so unfathomable
and distinctly
mystifying
omens!
Happily too for you the man you met that day Pauline
and whom you got talking to afterwards on that late
bus on your shared and reciprocally pleasurable
journey towards Reading’s town centre was
by any criterion which you could possibly
have devised a very exceptional person.
Clearly a local himself he was deeply
involved in a local community and
communal extracurricular education
programme that he’d altruistically, voluntarily
and solely devised and besides was himself
the coordinator of and that was expressly
tailored for and perceptibly directed at
educationally deprived members of
all ages over eleven years within
Reading’s broader community
devoid of the benefit of any
significant education or else if they were still
of lawful school age had found themselves
discriminatorily and immediately kicked
out of their learning establishment on
the basis of rather specious reasons
for not having them there, and as
assuredly as hell in those very
prescriptive circumstances
never ever likely to get
any sort of education
much less so minus
a determined and
committed try a
practical one!
However, with amorous intentions noticeably on your part
Pauline and quite obviously resulting from this chance
encounter that you had with this stranger focusing
intently in your head while simultaneously and
calculatedly encouraged by your similarly
actively cultivated, and themselves even
having a degree of urgency all their
own about them, expectations that
quite rapidly and unimpeded coursed through
your highly stimulated veins; a passionate
assignation, more so than any uplifting
educational agenda operating as the
principal motivation behind your
eager desire for pursuing this
brand new and exploratory
relationship, became your
superseding focus and
single-minded remit.
A promising association, as you very much saw it,
quite manifestly in the physical mode and itself
largely uninhibitedly complemented by - and
as you plainly and grievously felt in your
ambitious and overtly outlined personal
circumstances an exceptionally cruel
and wholly gratuitous sex-starved,
emotionally unsatisfied and, as
well, a marital, sexually-constrained and completely
insufferable situation –full-blooded, extravagantly
indulged in and consummately unrestrained acts
of truly licentious coitus. And having as agreed
met up later on in Reading’s town centre after
your personal business there was out of the
way you amicably had coffee together in
one of the local restaurants – you said
you weren’t hungry so no need then
for you to be fed – freely swapped
phone numbers with each other
and amidst the cheerful chatter
expectantly waited while the
stage was set for the next
chapter of this evidently
unforeseen but, all the
same, gripping and
fascinating saga.
Later that night you phoned your new friend, explained
that the children were soundly tucked up in bed and
therefore you were all alone; thus categorically
through what you intentionally said during
that specific conversation coupled with
the explicit and accompanying well-
rehearsed and quite purposeful,
coquettishly enticed invitation that you proffered and
which was instantly and likewise decidedly taken
up and satisfactorily signalling that both of you
were fervently conducive to the impending
chance of fucking each other, decisively
conferred the green light on the 1 July
1984 for the first sexual encounter
ever within the confines of your
marital home between you and
the man you’d intentionally
and somewhat deviously
as pivotal events would
later show assigned to
be your latest lover.
And in contrast and most profound in every way Pauline
was the positive contribution that this new man you’d
taken into your life brought not only into your own
but also and distinctly so the separate and joint
lives of your two children. Taking both girls,
after careful consideration for their future,
out of the sink school close to their home
that they were unsurprisingly expectedly
in, he constructively spoke to the then
incumbent Headmaster and an ingenious acquaintance
of his and had them both transferred from where they
were being “schooled” for their envisaged devalued
function in life to the absolutely first-rate English
Martyrs Catholic Primary School with its truly
exceptional teaching background, and from
where Cathy: the senior of the two girls,
would subsequently by virtue of adept preparation
at English Martyrs and her passing the requisite
entrance exams be promptly registered at and
become a highly gifted pupil of the all girl,
well-renowned and justifiably esteemed
Kendrick School in Reading. A very
apparent improbable prospect had
she and Tracey been obliged to
remain at the primary school
where previous to them
relocating to English
Martyrs they had
formerly been.
Furthermore, this thoroughly engaging man in your life
Pauline had at the voluntary and consistent request
of both your daughters, since their biological
father had long ceased to play any role
either meaningfully or financially
in their two young lives, been
asked to become their Dad
and following detailed discussions that were had
individually with them and collectively with
all three of you Pauline in favour of this
particular outcome willingly acceded
to do so. A terrifically gratifying
realization for him since in his
now constant dealings with
Cathy and Tracey, a direct consequence of his
steady and developing relationship with you
their mother, his feelings for and his every
day reactions with them had ever more
taken on a purposely and very much
appreciated and embraced by the
girls fatherly aspect; so in the
inclusive scheme of things
he fully understood the
girls’ filial sentiments
to which he fittingly
and accordingly
conferred the
maximum
respect.
A situation none the less that long before this collective
decision, which relative to them formally assuming
their new dad’s name for themselves had either
been consensually arrived at or agreed upon,
both girls had outmanoeuvred and also pre-
empted as was acknowledged by yourself
Pauline. For Cathy and Tracey had of
their own free volition unilaterally
and determinedly taken their new dad’s surname
anyway, which they then routinely applied to
all their schoolwork that in turn prompted
their teachers and the school’s admin –
as the surname they were using didn’t
match the official one in their class
register or the school’s records –
to politely request individually of the girls, you
Pauline and their new father too what really
was going on? Then fully satisfied after
their detailed investigation that it was
all initially the children’s very own
idea and purposive wish to be so
named and that no coercion or
unwarranted dominance of
them was involved at any
time in Cathy or Tracey’s
independent decision,
uninterruptedly and
officially this time,
let this definitive
action by their
pupils’ own
assertion to
jubilantly
carry on.
However, there was an unseen fly in the ointment. The
children’s new dad had with their explicit blessing,
that of their biological father, who he’d earnestly,
secretly and successfully tracked down but only
for this one specific purpose alone as no one
within the family honestly wanted anything
further to do with him, and your express
authorization too Pauline as your new
man’s locally accepted and generally acknowledged
involved relationship partner, faithfully wanted to
legally adopt the girls, drastically assuage and
finally heal the sense of estrangement that
they were agonizingly experiencing at
being in limbo over the constancy of
having a biological father who’d
callously abandoned them and
didn’t care, and a surrogate one: immensely
responsible, marvellously understanding
and always there for them but whose
personal rights regarding them as a
father weren’t just an unspecified
matter but lawfully as well were
disturbingly unclear; and thus
in what through this altruistic
measure he was assiduously
trying to do was genuinely
and amiably balance the
progressive state of the
link, which apparently
existed between him
as your decided on
loving companion
Pauline and you.
For everyone who knew of it, including the outstanding
and tremendously conscientious, local Labour Party
councillor for your area, Jo Lovelock to whom not
only your family but also its circumstances were
especially well known, and who I see is now in
2016 not only the leader of her party locally
but also that of Reading Borough Council
while continuing unsurprisingly to serve
the electorate she represents and the general public
too in the selfsame committed and conscionable
manner she has always done and in that regard
alone causes me to truly believe that she is
intensely blessed to have been fashioned
in the same unparalleled mould as her
national Labour Party Leader Jeremy
Corbyn, all readily and with sound
justification Pauline congenially
concluded and encouragingly
commented on the genuine
attachment which they’d
perceptibly and equally
receptively discerned
and that intuitively
was transparently
present between
your daughters,
their dad, and
your partner.
Life being what it is in Britain it seldom means that
what’s being sensibly desired or even necessarily
required will always be allowed to happen. So
conscientiously and responsibly as was his
nature and in the given situation that you
were all in relative to the prospective
and important realization of your
daughters’ adoption by him, your partner with
a studied conviction that was pragmatically
conceived undertook to fully discuss the
issue in hand of your daughters hopeful
adoption with a highly recommended
and, as it conveniently happened,
local firm of solicitors whose
particular specialization
was family matters.
However, the outcome of his in-depth discussion
with them ended up leaving him in no doubt
whatsoever and also devastated that his
ambition to adopt Cathy and Tracey
would be vigorously thwarted by
the court system that was
further compounded by
a general, profoundly
entrenched and a distinctly racially motivated
mindset held by the magistrates and judges
within the exclusively white run courts
operation that having non-white and
especially Black fathers, or even
mothers of colour, adopting
white children wasn’t for
them an ideal prospect
in any circumstance, however emotionally or
suitably attached these children and their
likely substitute parents were to each
other, and bearing in mind also the
marked negative connotations in
relation to the social fabric and
constructive cohesion of the
United Kingdom. So rather
than fighting a battle that in all possibility
couldn’t absolutely be won, if at all, it
would instead be much more rational
and to circumvent all distressing or
unwarranted anguish on the part
of your daughters and yourself
Pauline to knock that precise
aspiration of adopting your
children decisively on the
head; that after key talks
with Cathy, Tracey and
you, your partner quite
plausibly, regrettably,
But thoughtfully did.
But life has to go on and this harshly impeded
expectation cruelly suffered by the children,
disappointing though it was for them, only
served to reinforce the already intense
bond which freely and unreservedly
existed between your partner and
daughters that largely owing to
their sterling and impressive
resilience quickly and admirably bounced back
from their own enforced disappointment and
courageously embarked on the challenging
but resourceful task of optimistically and
confidently moving on in the interim
with their youthful lives under the
comprehensively guiding, and
correspondingly subliminal,
influential motivation, in
relation to their mutual
and daily interactions,
inspired in them by
your partner, their
obvious mentor,
and the person
they joyfully
prized and
absolutely
cheerfully
declared
as their
ONLY
father!
Motivated both by their father and also from within this
twin-pronged assertive stance taken by Cathy and
Tracey also began to reap other constructive
dividends and not least so as regards their
mother Pauline. Previously not having
throughout her life, and it was the
same for the girls too, set foot outside her hometown
Reading far less so the county of Berkshire that
Reading is located within, now and thanks
solely to her partner foreign paid for and
additionally lengthy vacations spent
in previously unaffordable and
not used to holiday destinations in far away
places cloaked in all year round tropical
sunshine routinely in virtually every
way for Pauline and her children,
and very much so through the
courtesy and generosity of
her partner and the girls’
father, became the
order of the day.
And it was the same from Pauline’s educational perspective.
For having initially and resolutely declined her partner’s
casual but all the same purposeful suggestion that she
might care to get involved in the extra-curricular
educational project he had locally initiated,
vigorously championed throughout its
continuation and was transparently
efficiently running, and besides
with both Cathy and Tracey
progressing by leaps and
bounds educationally and in other respects to
boot at their new school, Pauline not at all
desirous of being left behind began to
think there might be some valuable
benefit after all in her acquiring
a bona fide education too; and
having for the first time and
of her own volition raised the matter
of improving her education with
her partner’s assistance, as a
result of her deciding that
was what she actually
wanted to do keenly
revised her earlier
decision and, by
doing so, also
changed her
own mind.
Thrilled, very impressed and immensely encouraged all
the more by her straightforward decision relative her
positively upgrading her education, which in the
interim her partner had propitiously but also
guardedly out of his genuine concern not
to inadvertently give her the distinctly
mistaken notion that he was craftily
putting any coercion on her to get
the requisite decision which he
wanted and consequently to preclude that, even
after her previous and resolute refusal to be
educationally implicated in what he was
doing had secretly got in touch with a
number of progressive and standard
universities on her behalf, rather
eloquently outlined to them her
particular circumstances and
considerable potential, the
project he was involved
in, and confidently outlined too that he
could create a worthy student of her
if any of them had a mind to have
her; and in response delightedly
had received from all of them
their explicit agreement that
were he in turn to deliver
on what he’d promised,
all of them would be
ready to accept you
Pauline on to an
honours degree
element as an
adult student.
A year of devoted, intensive and comprehensive
tutoring of you then Pauline by your partner
coupled with a reciprocal appreciation of
and your own commitment to what he
was conscientiously doing gainfully
saw you through this demanding
but all the same commendable
endeavour you had willingly embarked upon,
and following the conclusion of the formal
UCAS clearing house procedure that all
prospective university students must
officially go through the aforesaid
universities which your partner
had formerly contacted plus
a couple more of them had
individually and officially
proffered you a place at
their establishment to
begin the instigation
of your undeniably
life transforming
undergraduate
Uni-training.
But this social and quite promising upliftment on your part
Pauline wasn’t without its unwarranted and deprecatory
impediments, with your father for one openly damning
what you’d done and making it absolutely clear that
no way should you be going to university; since as
far as he was concerned a woman’s place was in
the home permanently caring for her husband and children,
and with your pie in the sky and attendant irresponsible
notions about achieving an education it was hardly
surprising then that your former husband – your
divorce by then had officially gone through –
had left you for another woman. While in
the meantime your neighbours on the
council estate where you lived quite
cruelly ridiculed your university
aspirations, considering them
from their own constrained
and a discernible lack of
their self-progression
aspirations as you
vainly essaying
to be socially
above your
particular
station.
Even the bailiff who thankfully it did appear hadn’t a clue
regarding your impending university commencement
else in all probability he would have got those who
were employing him to sequester what meagre
assets you had together with your university
student’s grant – this by the way was the
epoch long before students’ loans were
ever conceived let alone inaugurated – to pay off some
at least of the enormous HP debts that you and your
former husband had quite improvidently run up,
sporadically kept on calling at your house as
was his stipulated remit no doubt although
realistically expecting nowt financially
from you, as he evidently and rather
injudiciously still thought that you
were still on DHS remittances as
your solitary redoubt following
your husband’s abandonment
of you and the children; and
which was something that
neither you Pauline nor
your partner were the
least predisposed to
apprise him about!
Reading University just three miles distance from where
you then lived Pauline readily accepted you for a place
there but you politely turned down their offer after
clarifying to your partner that you didn’t want to
give your detractors further ammunition, as it
were, to fire in your direction as an apparent
to them social turncoat with affected ideas
socially that in their eyes were manifestly
above your station and commensurately
theirs too as it happened. Since several of them likewise
single parent moms from the same council estate or
neighbouring ones were longstanding recipients
completely on social security benefits of one
kind or another that some of them covertly,
and often out of necessity, supplemented
with black market activities and hence
didn’t want you being pointed to by
the snoops of the Social Security
Department as some kind of a role model which they
could all emulate while personally viewing them
negatively. And for these basically convoluted
reasons and also because you still had to live
among these people Pauline you shrewdly
steered clear of moving to the university
in your hometown Reading and chose
in its place to be an undergrad at the
City of London University where,
on a regular basis, you wouldn’t
be so visibly in their faces, as it
were, but generally speaking
would be diplomatically in
the given and worrisome
circumstances, be truly
and consequently less
provocatively, it was
clear, in their way!
However it was an agreed decision that meant your partner
would now be primarily responsible for looking after the
children’s welfare for example: getting them up in the
morning, preparing their breakfast – no need for any
packed lunches as they had their midday meals at
school – meticulously but jovially supervising
their preparation for school, after that taking
them there and naturally fetching them for
their return journey home when their school day was
over; and in this overall process fulfilling every
other expedient role in between that a loving
and caring father instinctively, to the best
of his ability, with the utmost sincerity
that he’s humanly capable, and also
as someone who is always there
and as a result intuitively does
for every dependent charge
that rewardingly for him
rests within the ambit
of his devoted care.
And in the midst of all this you were neither overlooked
nor ever forgotten Pauline; for while making sure that
undisturbed you unfailingly had the maximum time
possible allotted for your university studies your
partner additionally, willingly offered, agreed,
and with your receptive backing undertook
to assist you in every way that he could
academically and supportively, and
from then on painstakingly and most diligently efficiently
carried on helping out with your studies. Then to amply
assist this accommodating strategy and process time-
wise and also in terms of any required adjustment
contingent on your daily travelling to and from
London positively and practically made sure
that on your return home, and in the most
favourably relaxing circumstances and
approving environment manageable,
that a suitably cooked, nutritional
and appetizing meal was always
ready and waiting for you on
the table, and appropriately
as well that there were no
household odd jobs still
pending and logically
waiting to be done.
A splendid option all round and made possible by your
partner’s welcomed innovations: like him for example
moving in with you and the children although he’d
rather judiciously decided to still keep his own
place; a situation which per the Department
of Health and Social Security’s rules in
situ would not only have specifically
forbidden him from cohabiting with you in your home
in view of your status as a recipient of social security
benefits but also negatively and very significantly
too affect your social security payments if these
said regulations were knowingly to the DHS
contravened. However with your changed
social and economic statuses now those
of a full-time student at university and
furthermore in receipt of a statutory Local Education
Authority grant this transformed situation on your
part of you no longer a “National State Benefit
Recipient Employee” Pauline, that decisively
established DHS constraining and besides
all-encompassing prohibition predictably,
understandably, most welcomingly and
now rationally; no longer, neither for
you Pauline nor your partner, had
any officially permitted or come
to that restricted authorization.
But just as leopards never change their spots with
some human beings, and you’re sadly one of
them Pauline, old habits die hard; and with
your partner now living almost full time
with you and the children unspecified
and vigilantly concealed incidents,
shall we say, willing occasioned
by you Pauline and that before
and understandably didn’t register with your
partner because you made absolutely sure
they were out of the way, entirely under
the radar of his intimate observation or
else given that you knew impeccably
well that trusting you as he plainly
did he wouldn’t be acting in any
distrustful fashion by looking
out for them, as quite simply
he wasn’t the sort of person to do anything
like that with no sound reason, none the
less gradually and puzzlingly for him
and particularly ill-starred for you
unanticipated things now began
to sink into his consciousness.
Which however you wilfully and rather
duplicitously in your deftly construed
Siren scenario to his conspicuously
involuntary Jasonesque situation
did everything in your power
in these totally unexpected
and potentially damaging
circumstances for your
relationship, to ensure
that this likely threat
to it, and especially
from the viewpoint
of the girls you’d
extremely bewail,
would not attain
any real chance
to ever prevail.
© Stanley V. Collymore
1 February 2016.
Author’s Remarks:
This poem and its associated articles were conceived and written in January 2016 for publication on the 1 February 2016 but were subsequently deliberately withheld by me for a number of salient reasons that really don’t concern you but were and still are important to me. And both the poem and its accompanying articles, now published a year later and fittingly on the 1st February 2017, are specifically dedicated to Pauline Cassidy and her accomplices.
Usually I comment on the poems and other literary work I write and publish. I shan’t this time however, as some things are beyond the pale and I most certainly do not only have my red lines over which I shan’t under any circumstance gratuitously or otherwise cross – and frankly have never done so in the past – but also similarly and quite significantly I neither appreciate nor would I contemplate for a solitary moment living in the sewers of perceptible degeneracy which considerable numbers of other people seemingly and thoroughly enjoy experiencing and even relish in permanently doing! But you, whether you willingly choose to or not and totally with my utmost indifference, are completely at liberty to either dismissively ignore or else form your own opinion on that matter; and that too is of no significance to me.
For in this specific case I’m just the chronicler of this poem and these accompanying articles, fully cognizant of all the pertinent facts, and consequently am not the arbiter of your personal judgement; a position I’ve no aspirant desire of undertaking or any intention whatsoever of ever aspiring to becoming.
COMMENTS
-