The Ultimate Vampire Resource and Directory

By Stanley Collymore



How is it possible, and why is it permitted by the rest of the global community, for the world’s principal meddler in other peoples’ and their countries domestic affairs to pompously lecture others, and largely get away with it too, on what it has itself arrogantly, dishonestly and brutally been doing ever since its own turbulent inception as a fledgling state in 1776?



And how can the United States of America that has routinely, savagely and self-servingly toppled popular and democratic governments across the world, customarily replacing them with brutal dictatorships of its own choosing; that unilaterally foments coup d’états elsewhere globally thousands of miles away from its own borders and even the region where the USA is located risibly lecture others on their duty to respect the sovereign integrity of nations and the need to comply with and adhere to international law; concepts that the said USA picks and chooses to suit its own selfish whims and fancies and invariably perverts at every turn?



Moreover, what feasibility or credibility, come to that, can any prescient-minded or intelligent person attach, and why should they, to the hollow, insulting, downright narcissistic and bombastic pronouncements of a United States of America that not only criminally but also consistently flouts its own laws and the hallowed and enshrined tenets of its national Constitution while arrogating to itself the sole right to haughtily and uncompromisingly dictate to others how they should behave?



And who was it that imperiously coined the phrase “regime change”, which effectively means the literal and subjective dispensing by any means at the aggressor’s disposal, including the use of fraudulently trumped up charges relating to the alleged violation of domestic human rights, themselves commensurate with equally lying indictments of crimes against humanity principally directed against US targeted victim states and their chosen leaders and very often supplemented by US or NATO military attacks at the behest of the United States?



Actions perpetrated against those that these western entities decide to go after in order to liquidate perceived opponents of what the United States considers as its exclusive right to determine what the world order should be, and whose real crime from the perspective of US leaders, who gave the world this obnoxious term “regime change”, is that these targeted countries and their leaders dared to chart their own independent course, as is their right, and in doing so resolutely refused to toe the United States dictated and foreign policy line; decisions interpreted by the US, its EU and NATO stooges as threats that couldn’t be countenanced and therefore must militarily be removed to further facilitate the growing and overbearing presence of US imperialistic and global hegemony!



Looks to me, bearing all this and much more in mind, that rather than spending inordinate periods of time, effort and money that it can ill afford lambasting, vilifying, denouncing and whenever and wherever possible destroying those who consciously behave as all responsible and mature adults should, that the United States and its woefully uninformed citizenry together with its complicit and compliant crony NATO and EU satrapies would, as indeed the rest of the world, be best served if the United States and its plethora of obsequious, willing and useful idiots globally and particularly in Europe quite literally grow up; begin to emulate the behaviour of those world leaders who’re actually adult in their conduct, and stop being the downright exasperating, interfering, intolerant, sanctimonious and utterly dangerous pain in the ass that this unholy construct known as the west and led by the US quite asininely and evidently is.



For to have the US, EU and NATO loudly and recurrently pontificating about human rights and the rest of it is analogous to a vicious serial killer lecturing both the relatives of his victims and others as well on the sanctity of human life. It’s highly perverse and unless you’re testosterone-driven sociopaths like Victoria Nuland, Samantha Power, Jen Psaki and even Hillary Clinton; village idiots like John McCain, and other deranged nutters, past and present, within the US political establishment as well as our very own here in the UK, notably the entire Con-Dem government and its leadership in tandem with Ed Miliband and the born again Blairites in his shadow cabinet, makes no sense at all. Not to normal people anyway! Maybe what we do need in the UK right now is a Maidan-type putsch of the kind that these aforementioned UK bastards helped to illegitimately gain power in Ukraine.



And wouldn’t it be most interesting to see how our Zionist Jews and their Friends of Zionist apartheid Israel: the likes of David Cameron, Ed Miliband, who wouldn’t have been born in Britain if at all anywhere if his parents hadn’t fled the same odious Nazis and Fascist mass murderers and genociders that he’s now supporting in Ukraine, Boris Johnson and Malcolm Rifkin responded, knowing, as they should do, the pedigree of these descendants and disciples of Stepan Bandera. As I’ve said elsewhere we could do with some serious ethnic cleansing of the right sort with its attendant genocidal liquidation in the UK, and who better in the current circumstance than the successors of Stepan Bandera’s lot to do it.



After all, it was Clement Attlee’s post World War II Labour Government that at the behest of the United States let into Britain scores of thousands of these Ukrainian Waffen SS Nazi, death camp killers and ethnic genociders, Fascists and their families and they’re still living here in the form of their British born offspring, masquerading as the English Defence League (EDL); the sort of people, if one can call odious Nazi and Fascist scum that, that prized prats like the incumbent Community Secretary in David Cameron’s Con-Dem regime, Eric Pickles literally worships. So bring on the Maidan and their current leader Dmitry Yarosh I say and have the wheel turn full circle! After all that’s what the US and its European stooges, including our own parliamentary ones, wanted in Ukraine, so why not in the UK as well? Maybe these imperialist and duplicitous jerks should first have familiarized themselves with the maxim: “Beware what you wish for on others that you unwarrantably despise and plot harm against” before they criminally got involved themselves in the Ukraine.



Even within their own national borders democracy is routinely seen and firmly acknowledged by the west’s political and controlling elites as something they must and what’s more have the right to selfishly manipulate. And with this mindset assiduously adhered to it’s hardly surprising then that when it comes to dealing with local people and their leaders in other countries those who support this western point of view concomitant with the west’s foreign policy objectives, however undemocratic, immoral or even dictatorial this process is, are deemed by the west as democratic entities.



While those who don’t, regardless of how overwhelmingly transparent and truly democratic their openly expressed choices or decisions are, are denounced by the west as undemocratic, the same west that then initially threatens them demanding that they desist from their freely chosen, morally exemplary and impeccably independent course of action; and should they refuse to yield to such unreasonable behaviour and undisguised blackmail unhesitatingly in western political eyes become prime targets for western coercive and or military regime change.



Chicago has always been and still is one of the most violent and politically corrupt places in the United States, and where such places are not uncommon. Currently the former White House advisor to Barack Obama is Chicago’s incumbent mayor and Barack himself before his elevation to the presidency of the USA was the US senator for the state of Illinois of which Chicago is a constituent part. Refresh my memory if you care to but I don’t recall either of these two men doing a great deal, if anything at all, to rectify for the better the perilous situation in Chicago.



Yet both of them, and Barack Obama specifically in his role as President of the United States of America, have never had any disinclination nor difficulty, while studiously eschewing all critical comments or justified condemnations relative to Chicago itself and similar corrupt entities across the entire United States, in not only unwarrantably and publicly making completely subjective and uncorroborated condemnatory pronouncements on countries and their leaders that they don’t like – that’s shorthand for those countries and their leaders who implacably refuse to become part of the American Empire – but also vehemently set about dictating to them how they should conduct their own affairs.



A situation that would be analogous, if I were so obtuse but thankfully I’m not, to my standing in front of my open bedroom window on the top floor of my house, looking outside and seeing a male passerby using the quite legitimate public footpath that runs parallel to my home and the other neighbouring houses, imperiously and without any provocation whatsoever on this passersby part shout to him: “Don’t you dare step off that footpath and walk on my lawn!”; something that this guy wasn’t in the process of doing nor did his demeanour indicate that he ever had the slightest interest or intention of doing so.



But guess what? My subjective and arrogant dislike of this man who has never done me any harm and who I honestly don’t know nevertheless compels me to find out where he lives, to then go over to his house when he’s not there, discover that he has a wife, coercively through her evident fear of me sexually seduces her behind her husband’s back and what’s more quite impudently do so inside his own home; and when this man finally discovers what I’ve been doing to his wife and demands to know why, my conceited and hubristic response to him is, “Because I can bloody well do so and get away with it; and there’s bugger all that you can do to stop me!”



An accurate assessment of the United States and its western satrapies’ global attitudes and foreign policy agenda, wouldn’t you say? But the pertinent question is: “Are you entirely happy with this, and if not and especially to those of you living in the west what are you going to do about it?

By Stanley Collymore



David Cameron thinks the Crimean referendum is “a mockery of democracy.” Apart from reaching that conclusion because it’s not the result he wanted one is nevertheless bound to ask, listening to him say that, do the mouths of the likes of David Cameron ever engage with their brains, albeit limited in scope as they evidently are, before their imbecilic owners decide to speak?



In Britain we have an electoral system of first past the post which is anything but democratic. For not only is it routinely possible for the alleged winner in any electoral race to end up receiving less votes than the combined total of votes garnered by the other candidates, which means that even among those who bothered to vote the so-called winner not only doesn’t enjoy majority support but equally there hasn’t been in living memory either in UK parliamentary or local government elections anything that’s remotely in excess of 50% of eligible voters turning out to vote; so it can hardly be said that our MPs and local government councillors enjoy the majority support of the British electorate. Usually in general elections in the UK the voter turn out is around 33% and in local elections anything between 7% and 18 % of voters who bother to turn up to vote. So work out the maths for yourselves



Even the universally acknowledged mass murderer Tony Blair in his so-called landslide victory in 1997 got that alleged landslide on the back of just 33% of the British electorate turning out to vote and that figure was itself divided between the three main parties consisting of Blair’s New Labour Party, the Tories, Lib-Dems, other minority parties, and of course independent candidates. So where’s the democracy you’re vaunting so much here in the UK that wasn’t prevalent in Crimea’s case David Cameron, a situation where most of the UK’s electorate chooses not to vote rather than actually doing so?



And how ironic David that you’re the Prime Minister of our country yet no one voted for you to become that since your party, even under our skewed electoral system, didn’t get a majority of seats in the House of Commons and it was only through a carpetbagging deal with the minority Lib-Dems, as the Liberal Party that was, out of power for nearly a century, hungry for power and seizing the opportunity to be in government again, cobbled together a deal out of mutual avarice, expediency and self-interest with your Tory Party where you as leader of the Tories and Nick Clegg that of the Lib-Dems facilitated a situation where by virtue of they and your Tories combined having had more seats in the House of Commons than the rest of the shower that got elected there you became PM and in return you made Nick Clegg your Deputy PM. Self-interest on both sides or what?



So please don’t from your sanctimonious high tower lecture anyone on either the concept or principles of democracy David, as it sure as hell isn’t practised within the UK’s electoral system; nor in the US or Canada for that matter, close allies of the UK, where national and local elections are routinely stolen in both these countries. Who can ever forget the 2000 and again the 2004 Presidential Elections fiasco in the USA, Florida and Ohio respectively, or the last two national elections in Canada where a new dimension was appended to the word fraudulent. But of course you know this well David as do the leaders of the other parties in the House of Commons, but none of you want change or a decent electoral system in the UK because the current and fraudulent one serves your purposes adequately and keeps genuine representatives of the people out of parliament.



For example, as things stand diversity in the House of Commons is non-existent, other political parties not deemed as mainstream are seriously disadvantaged, prevented from having any free electoral airtime on the BBC and the other UK media because they haven’t any MPs while your Tories, Labour and the Lib-Dems hog it all and voters are essentially left high and dry with nowt else but Hobson’s Choice handed to them; in other words take it or leave it. It’s all smoke and mirrors with you lot when you talk about democracy, isn’t it?



Furthermore, there’s no ethical selection of candidates either for parliamentary or local council seats where the Tories, labour or Lib-Dems are concerned, since it’s not the membership of the respective parties or even the constituency voters in open primaries that determine who the eventual party candidates are but rather an unrepresentative Cabal of central office party apparatchiks that do so and anyone with fresh ideas or who challenges the status quo that the three major parties rely so heavily on and benefit enormously from hasn’t a snowflake in hell’s chance of being selected as a candidate.



And there have even been instances, very rare I must admit, where a local constituency party, in the case of all three of the major parties, has either overwhelmingly or even unanimously chosen as their parliamentary candidate someone who they feel will best represent the interests of that respective constituency but who nevertheless found himself or herself rejected by the party’s hierarchy with the democratic will of the local constituency party dismissively overturned and instead a favourite, invariably an outsider to that constituency but who is either a relative, friend or has the right connections with the party’s hierarchy, is imposed on that constituency with the local constituency party’s choice of candidate summarily rejected. Not exactly democracy in action, is it David?



Moreover, please tell me if you can why if you, Nick Clegg, Ed Miliband and the rest of you, hopelessly out of touch with reality, the electorate and the 21st Century and who individually as well as collectively have never held down a proper job in your lives, are so committed to democracy as you say David, why on earth is there a need for a party Chief Whip and Deputies in parliament and whose official role is to force MPs, whether or not they want to, to always toe the official party line or else at best get themselves severely disciplined or worst still even be expelled from the party for not doing so? Aren’t MPs supposed to be in the House of Commons first and foremost to represent the best interests of their constituents who elected them to office in the first place and not simply to act as cannon fodder for the likes of you David, Nick Clegg, Ed Miliband and the arrogant bully boy apparatchiks that run your respective parties; acting not in the interest of us mere subjects, as you see us the average British citizen, but I hasten to add those of your business and corporate pals as well as the military industrial complex that collectively have bought and paid for the lot of you. And therefore have you firmly in their pockets?



The 135 independent observers from over 23 countries that monitored the Crimean referendum all declared it to be free, fair and above board; which incidentally begs the question, how many monitors or observers do Britain, the US, Canada, the EU states or the rest of the arrogant west have in their territories come election time to monitor your elections? But as with the same exceptionalist mindset you have when it comes to your possession of nuclear weapons which you can tenaciously hang on to and even upgrade contrary to the NPT provisions, that actually you’re a party and signatory to, while arrogantly and belligerently denying others the same right to even contemplate having nuclear weapons of their own let alone develop them for their own protection, which is what you say you have yours for, with you it’s all about we can be trusted but others who aren’t our friends or collaborators as in NATO can’t be. Never mind that your actions quite often conflict with your empty words.



But hey! You’re white, Caucasian and belong to the Master Race, don’t you? And what’s more are God’s Chosen People as well; as you ensured that the entire world knew David when you visited Israel in your role as PM in March 2014, assertively stating while you were there that you have Jewish ancestry. So even if you don’t win the next General Election David, Britain will still have another Jew at the helm of British politics as its Prime Minister in the shape of Ed Miliband, and with him also a staunch Zionist and committed friend of apartheid Israel as you are David it’ll be business as usual. And what really pisses me off is that you Zionist Jews while having no problems ethnically cleansing the Palestinians from their millennia old ancestral homeland as your white Caucasian lot did to the Aborigines of Australia, Maoris of New Zealand and the indigenous inhabitants of North America for example, wiping Palestine off the map of the world and replacing it increasingly with a Zionist apartheid Israel exclusively as a homeland for European settler Jews who unlike the Palestinians aren’t Semites even though they fraudulently claim to be but are effectively the descendants of white Caucasian Europeans whose ancestors had converted to Judaism.



Without a touch of irony and shamelessly so as well you not only don’t mind living in other peoples’ countries while arrogating to yourselves the right to have Israel solely for Jews but also assume that it’s your paramount privilege to be in charge of and moreover run these countries as well, as you’re cheerfully doing in the UK David, AIPAC etc are in the United States and Ed Miliband similarly wants to do in the UK. And before you hit back by saying that you and Ed Miliband were both born in the UK, which I fully accept, my response to that is so were the Palestinians in Palestine where they’re native to that land and have lived in for millennia unlike your family David or that of Ed Miliband relative to England or even the rest of the UK. And the Palestinian analogy is also quite pertinent in the case of other indigenous peoples globally that you white Caucasians have savagely either ethnically cleansed, displaced or exterminated.



But neither you nor Ed Miliband takes any bloody cognisance of that in your rabid support for Israel, do you? Yet as I earlier mentioned one of you Zionist Jews will be Prime Minister of the UK, with or without the incorporation of Scotland, after the next UK general election. So how do you justify this hypocrisy and rank double standards both of you? All the same, and with all the sarcasm that I can muster, how very nice to know that it’s not the general interests of the average Brit suffering under severe austerity caused by the actions of a bunch of venal and incompetent assholes from both sides of the aisle of the House of Commons purportedly running our country but a foreign, Zionist and apartheid state where the primary interests of yourself David, together with that of Nick Clegg and Ed Miliband all of whom along with the likes of Boris Johnson, yet another Jew, are angling for the position of Prime Minister of Britain lay!



So I’m not the least bit surprised David that you and your ilk disapprove of what has gone on in the Crimea and use the kind of dishonest language that you’re also so good at in vilifying what took place there, and regrettably get away with what you’re doing because the majority of British voters not only consider our electoral system a bloody sham, and which accounts partially for their apathy, but also because most of them are totally distrustful of your lot and absolutely hold you all in contempt, knowing as well that as things stands you all have such a grip on the political system that there’s bugger all they can do to change matters other than by means of a revolution and that’s not the British way. More’s the pity!



So if there’s any mockery going on David it’s what the Crimean referendum makes of the likes of you David and the overwhelming majority of your MP colleagues in the House of Commons and what you stand for and that’s why you feel you must criticize what went on there as it additionally throws a ruddy great spanner in the works of the global hegemonic and geopolitical objectives of the US and its satrapies, and that includes the UK, in your relentless and onward march eastwards towards Russia’s borders with the delusional hope that in doing so you will eventually succeed in securing the Crimea as a major base for NATO. Dream on!



Now you’re an old Eton boy David Cameron and I would have thought that you would have been aware that even when France and Britain fought Russia in the Crimean War and bombarded that part of the Russian Empire with the hope of getting their hands on Crimea that enterprise failed abysmally and they were jointly unable to wrest the Crimea from Russia; so why the hell would Russia, which has had a naval presence in the Crimea continuously since 1783 let you do so now? That would be analogous to some foreign power trying to wrest Portsmouth or Southampton from the English. And especially after the numerous promises the west made to Russia post the collapse of the Soviet Union relative to not having NATO advance eastwards to Russia’s borders, promises which were instantly broken as was evidenced in the Baltic, Poland, Romania etc who can blame Russia for taking a firm stance over the Crimea which is actually right on its doorstep? Think on it Old Boy!



And that’s what really pisses you, Nick Clegg, Ed Miliband and the rest of them off isn’t it David? After all you recognized Kosovo’s right to self-determination and were quite happy to observe the further break up of Serbia through having it lose Montenegro, and you boasted David about how Argentina and the rest of the world must recognize and accept the will of the 2000 people on the Falkland Islands in their UK sponsored referendum, so why don’t you and those that think like you do the same relative to the almost three million people of the autonomous republic of Crimea that for centuries was geographically, culturally and linguistically part of Russia but was capriciously given by Nikita Khrushchev to the Ukraine in 1954 when they were both part of the USSR without any consultation either with the Crimean people or the Ukrainians come to that and de facto stayed with Ukraine when the USSR imploded in 1991?



And now having witnessed the events in Kiev occasioned by the Nazis and Fascists that especially the US, UK, Germany and France have put in power there through a brutal and murderous coup financed at the rate of $US50 per day to the street thugs of the Nazi and Fascist parties that brought about this illegal and unconstitutional power grab in Kiev, something that the Crimeans and indeed most Ukrainians had nothing to do with, and sensibly not wanting to be a part of it, why in those circumstances don’t you and others like you David, as if we didn’t already know the answer to that question, not accept the inalienable right of the Crimeans to determine their own future especially when nothing but lawlessness prevails in Kiev regardless of how much gloss you put on it or how blatantly you parade this illegitimate puppet thug of yours and so-called prime minister there on the international stage to garner respectability for him?



Any true believer in democracy would not only accept and embrace the decision of the Crimean people but would also wish them well; so it shows with your refusal to do so what a hypocrite and purveyor of double standards you really are but people like myself already knew that David; and besides we also know that you have to please your US chain puller every bit as Angela Merkel and the rest of them are evidently obliged to. In your case David willingly so, as you and your current cabinet colleagues made perfectly clear on your visits to the US when you were still in opposition promising to do everything the US demanded of you; while in Angela Merkel’s case it’s thanks to the US’s blackmail of her, her covert links with Stasi being one such hold over her, and obviously the NSA file on her from its intensive spying and other surveillance of this woman.



Now we have that idiot the west has installed in Kiev as PM threatening all manner of atrocities on those in Crimea who instigated and organized the populist referendum there, openly promising that hellfire will burn under their feet and there’ll be no hiding place for them. Just imagine for a just a second or so that those were the words of the Argentinean President after the Falklands referendum and were directed at the people ton those islands or even British officials, we all know what would happen. There would immediately be hell to pay for Argentina with Britain referring the matter to the UN Security Council and all the rest of it. But when it comes to the west’s Nazi puppet in Kiev there’s not a dickey bird’s tweet coming from you David, Nick Clegg, Ed Miliband or the rest of you charlatans.



In addition to all that the Nazi head of security and the armed forces in Kiev has threatened Russia with a nuclear attack saying that the Ukraine has the capacity and the determination to build and deliver nuclear weapons within 3-6 months. Again no comment or condemnation from the west on what is a real threat to Europe as Ukraine does have the nuclear knowhow to build at least a dirty bomb and in Soviet times actually hosted nuclear weapons. But can you imagine with the west’s fixation with Iran’s non-existent nuclear threat what the response would have been not only from western governments but also their media if such a threat instead of emanating from the Ukraine had been made by some official in Iran? For as you said yourself David while you were recently in Israel that Iran must never be permitted to have nuclear weapons, which in your skewed thinking relative to Iran would not only be a major threat to Israel, paramount in your concerns no doubt as the Zionist you are, but also a threat to the world.



No such concerns about Ukraine having them though and what’s more asininely threatening to use them against a superpower with a well stocked nuclear arsenal of the sort that Russia has and the rest of the world is well aware of. What, pray tell, does this prime asshole, or you for that matter David, think that Russia would do, just sit on its hands and say ah well it’s not worth responding to? And wouldn’t such a reckless act on the part of Ukraine pose a real as apart from a fabricated threat in Iran’s case to the whole world; for sure as the sun rises in the east Russia would respond and quite massively so. But you David are just as idiotic as this nutter in Kiev for you have just sent RAF fighter jets to patrol the borders of Russia. What a bloody waste of time and money that Britain can ill afford, and no one in the House of Commons has the balls to tell you so.



This bearing in mind and adding insult to injury that an increasing number of British working families are having to turn to charitable food banks to make ends meet while within the same UK the five richest families own more wealth than the combined total of over 20% of British people at the lower end of the economic scale. But David Cameron doesn’t mind risking a thermo-nuclear war to ensure that the interests of the 1% are catered for as opposed to that of the bulk of our population. And honestly ask yourselves, in a nuclear tussle with Russia who do you think will win? Answers please, as they say, on the back of a postage stamp.



Britain posturing as usual and asininely trying to punch above its weight, with complete morons living in your world of fantasy. Meanwhile Jews are again fleeing Europe this time from Ukraine courtesy of the Nazi and Fascist government that the west have installed in Kiev, and those that have reluctantly decided to stay are getting paramilitary training from the Israeli Defence Force in order to defend themselves; this in 2014, the 21st Century and a throwback to the days of World War II when the Waffen SS ancestors of these current Fascist and Nazi killers liquidated not only Jews but Russians and Poles. And the agenda of their descendants is exactly the same. In 2014; but all that you David Cameron, Nick Clegg, Ed Miliband, Boris Johnson and the rest of you along with the US and NATO can think of is the west’s geopolitican positioning in eastern Europe. A situation that’s compounded by deliberately adopting a Nelsonian blind eye to what is happening in the Ukraine thanks to your unwarranted intervention there and when challenged on this passing it off as Russian propaganda.



From my own personal perspective it’s sincerely hoped that the Frankenstein monster that the west has unleashed in Ukraine will do precisely what did happen in that original scenario, and that these descendants of Ukraine’s World War II notorious Waffen SS do a much better job than what their parents and grandparents did; but instead of killing decent citizens, be they Russians or Jews, that they concentrate instead on actually wiping out en masse the Zionist scum of all kinds and not least so those that brought them to power; and as much as I detest these odious Ukrainian scumbags I’ll be more than delighted to provide them with the names of several of our own British Zionist scum that they can flex their muscles on.



Since I’m wholeheartedly of the view that some ethnic cleansing of the right sort wouldn’t at all be a bad thing for Britain; analogous to setting a cane field on fire at harvest time. It gets rid of trash, snakes and replenishes the soil. And there’s a hell of a lot of trash and snakes in Britain, trust me; and high time that we replenished, proverbially speaking, our own soil!

By Stanley Collymore



Angela Merkel has threatened Russia with “massive damage” if the referendum in Crimea takes place on Sunday 16 March 2014. Oh yeah! Have I missed something here or what? Isn’t this analogous to the bastards who run the Royal bank of Scotland, which exists only because of a massive taxpayers’ bailout yet still continues to run up massive financial debts, attempting to blackmail the British public by threatening to do even more badly if we the taxpayers don’t allow its executives and other principal employees to continue having their enormous and quite ludicrous bonuses on the asinine pretext that they need to have these as incentives to attract and keep the best staff there is in the banking business? Well if these are the best then give me the worst I say!



In her condemnation of Russia and Crimea Angela Merkel also echoes the hypocrisy of the US, the rest of the EU and that of other western satrapies that such a referendum is illegal and unconstitutional and infringes Ukraine’s territorial and sovereign integrity. How odd, when Germany did exactly the sorts of things Angela Merkel is now complaining about in Yugoslavia on behalf of its wartime ally Croatia and equally in Serbia when with its NATO partners it dismantled Yugoslavia and wrenched Kosovo from Serbia at the barrel of a gun, with no plebiscite granted to the Albanians in Kosovo on whose behalf this unilateral independence move was trumpeted, compounded by the aforementioned UDI by a bunch of terroristic, criminal and other odious henchmen doing the west’s bidding in Kosovo. Furthermore, this so-called independence was recognized by Germany, its EU and NATO pals long before the UN was strong-armed by them to follow suit.



German MP Gregor Gysi following Merkel’s speech in the German Bundestag caustically lambasted her for her hypocrisy and blatant double standards regarding the Crimea when set against her quite enthusiastic support for and hasty recognition of Kosovo as an independent country when it was in effect an integral territorial part of Serbia in the same way that Hamburg or Hesse are of Germany, while Crimea is an autonomous republic in Ukraine, transferred to the latter in 1954 from being an integral part of Russia for centuries in an administrative move when both the Ukraine and Crimea were part of the then USSR.



As for Germany and the rest of the west’s alleged respect for other’s territorial integrity how about Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, the Yemen, Pakistan, Somalia, Sudan, Venezuela and Syria among many other countries where the west has not only shown a marked lack for such integrity in these countries but has also gone on to meddle in their internal affairs politically and militarily with disastrous consequences for the local people, varying from attacks and invasions by the west, usually NATO, to the funding, training and arming of terrorist insurgents sent into these countries by these western states to operate in these targeted countries; fostering armed conflict, to the break up of these countries and the recognition of the west’s hived off portions as occurred in Kosovo and again in Sudan as independent nations and where with indecent haste, in the case of Sudan, the US recognized Southern Sudan as an independent nation the very next day, and even sent an ambassador promptly there.



In Syria the same mindset prevails with scores of German, UK, US and other NATO and EU countries’ Special Forces covertly operating there in an undeclared war by the west that was entirely responsible for starting all the mayhem currently being witnessed there in the first place. And in neighbouring Iraq despite Britain and the US having theoretically exited from that country they and their allies are still very instrumental in all the bloodshed we hear about and witness going on there. All of which has one specific purpose in mind, namely the geopolitical objectives of the west and most specifically the US and its EU satrapies. Additionally the west and that includes Germany funds, trains and arms jihadists now fighting in Syria as they did in Libya; while the US in particular does the same in Latin America, most notably Venezuela. Clear examples of blatant double standards and outright hypocrisy on the part of the west now bellyaching about Crimea.



Then there are the US and Britain’s drone wars in Afghanistan, North Africa, Yemen and elsewhere, and Britain has made it known that when it pulls out of its illegal invasion of Afghanistan in a war that has gone one there longer than the duration of World Wars I and II combined these UK killer drones will be moved to bases in Africa and the Middle East. But the US and Britain aren’t alone in these acts of contravening other countries’ sovereignty. France and the rest of NATO also do the same, and while apparently it’s okay for a dictatorial and puppet president of Mali very much under the thumb of his former colonial ruler France to invite French troops into Mali.



However any notion of the Crimean people who are overwhelmingly ethnic Russian, having seen what has transpired in Kiev and how the west has embraced it even when the language of the Crimea people has been proscribed, to ask their close neighbours and countrymen in Russia and de facto the Russian parliament and government to come to their assistance in an emergency, that according to the warped minds of these western leaders is wrong and an interference in Ukraine’s domestic affairs. This despite the fact that neither Crimea nor the vast majority of the people of east Ukraine played any part in the coup that brought odious Fascists and Nazis to power in Kiev with the support of the west and don’t want to have anything to do with them.



So these western countries condemnation of Russia for not doing what they themselves routinely do in other peoples’ countries and consent to their bullying to influence Crimea not to hold its referendum, even if Russia could or felt disposed to, is double standards gone barmy. And as for Russia having military personnel in Crimea that’s like wilfully ignoring the fact that the US has hundred of bases in 139 countries globally; British bases in Cyprus and French ones in several African countries where these supposedly now independent African countries but once French colonies have no say in them being there, with France unilaterally deciding where to have them and how many and what kinds of personnel they have located there. Read my published article France loots Africa, liquidates dissidents on http://www.politicoacademic.blogspot.com.



Whilst in marked contrast Russia has had a military presence in Crimea since 1783 when the former 13 British North American colonies that formed the fledgling United States of America having declared their independence from Britain in 1776 after their successful war of Independence to determine their own future, as Crimea is now attempting to do, were just six years in existence and Cyprus with its UK so-called sovereign bases where the Cypriots have no jurisdiction at all wasn’t a colony then, as it is now any longer of Britain; yet the UK still sees fit to have bases there thousands of miles away from its borders of the UK and by no stretch of the imagination in the region of western Europe.



As previously stated elsewhere Crimea is culturally, linguistically and psychologically part of Russia; something that one can’t say for the Cypriots vis-à-vis the UK. Moreover the population of the Crimea is overwhelmingly ethnic Russian and see themselves as Russians. And to reiterate the point earlier made the Crimea has been physically a part of Russia for several centuries until 1954 when President of the USSR Nikita Khrushchev administratively made it a part the Ukraine not expecting, as did anyone else for that matter, that decades later the USSR with western interference would break up. And even then Crimea’s link to Ukraine was a loose one with Crimea retaining full autonomy within the framework of a greater Ukraine; so Russia presence in the Crimea is by any definition far more legitimate and logical than that of Britain’s in Cyprus ever could be classified.



Yet Britain and the west see nothing wrong with Britain “occupying” sovereign bases in Cyprus but Crimea which has Russia on its doorstep shouldn’t have its kith and kin anywhere near that place. How utterly bizarre when the Australian regime can send Aussie troops to Afghanistan to assist their white kith and kin there. For if that’s not the case please explain to me if you can when was the last time that Afghanistan threatened attacked or invaded Australia located on the other side of the world and isn’t even, or could it logically be, a member of NATO: which as far as I know literally stands for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and Aussie-land is very much located in the far reaches of the South Pacific Ocean. So if white Caucasians who have ethnically cleansed large parts of Australia that dwarf the entire British Isles several times over of their aboriginal populations, stolen by savage brute force their country where these people lived alone, continuously and undisturbed for over 60,000 years and still treat those Aborigines that have managed to survive like dirt, can send forces to help out what they see as the Mother Country in its illegal wars, why the hell shouldn’t the Russians who are next door to the Crimea not do the same in respect of their own kith and kin?



Which begs the further question if after all Russia is condemned by these jerks in the west, and we know who the usual suspects are, for its association with Crimea, what the hell is Britain doing in Cyprus, France in supposedly independent African countries and the US in all these bases that it has globally, including those in Britain, Germany, Japan but most notoriously Guantanamo Bay: a very physical and integral part of a sovereign and independent Cuba where for in excess of 50 years now the Cubans have been demanding their territory back and requesting that the US leave their country; but to no avail! And if this is a classic example of disrespect for and the blatant usurpation of the rights of another sovereign and independent country as well as its national integrity then I don’t know what is.



But you see when it comes to justice and fair play these aren’t characteristics that are interpreted as they should be by the west, but are essentially determined by what the west and most particularly the US and its European satrapies decide are in their own best interests and to hell with anyone who thinks differently or raises the issue of hypocrisy and double standards. So basically justice should be defined and spelt, relative to the behaviour and mindset of the west, as JUST-US, as in just us; namely the US and its satrapies. But when these utterly abhorrent and absolutely moronic clowns want to vilify others and parade themselves dishonestly and self-centredly as the fanciful champions of others with all the garbage they hubristically employ of human rights and the sickening rest of it that they don’t actually believe in except in respect of themselves and never practice even at home, then we hear a lot about JUSTICE. The sort of justice that all honourable people recognize, but now in these selected and quite perverse incidences on behalf of people the west sanctimoniously claims it’s rooting for but don’t even bother to consult, we see the pretence of JUSTICE being disreputably used by the west as a battering ram to clout those who highlight and condemn their dishonest and perfidious actions.



Gregor Gysi the German MP who lambasted Angela Merkel for her dishonesty in the speech she gave to the German Bundestag on Thursday 13 March 2014 immediately after she stepped down from that podium where he would subsequently deliver his attack on her equated Crimea’s situation to that of Kosovo with two major differences. The Albanians in Kosovo had no choice in Kosovo becoming a so-called independent state which it clearly isn’t, as it can’t exist unilaterally financially and depends exclusively for its funding from western handouts and the multiplicity of criminal activities organized and run by the odious bunch of mafia thugs put in charge there by the west.



In marked contrast all the Crimean people will have their democratic say in the plebiscite being carried out in Crimea on Sunday 16 March 2014; and while Serbia was bombed into submission by the west and threatened with a land invasion as well by that same entity unless it relinquished Kosovo to the unilateral control of the thugs that the US and its European satrapies had put in place there for their own geopolitical objectives and the expansion of NATO onto Russia’s borders, Russia hasn’t done the same with Crimea nor would it embark on doing so with what are essentially its Russian kith and kin in Crimea.



And why posits Gregor Gysi is it okay on the part of the west for Kosovo to have its independence unilaterally and with no plebiscite in that province; okay too for the Falkland Islanders to have a western backed referendum; for South Sudan with the west’s covert military intervention and open political support to also have its independence; for Scotland to have a referendum on whether it wants to stay in the United Kingdom or not, but when the Basque people of Spain and the Catalonians there want to decide their own future for themselves; and when Crimea states that it wants to do likewise, the same western countries that sanctions all of the aforementioned and are quite comfortable with their instigated outcomes suddenly, truculently and rather bizarrely declare such objectives by these latter groups of people to be illegal, unconstitutional or else infringing the sovereignty of the lands they don’t want these people to separate from, be it Spain or Ukraine.



The very Spain that while refusing the Basque and Catalonian peoples the right to make their own informed and free choices relative to their future in or outside of Spain, none the less demands that the people of Gibraltar and that territory be transferred lock stock and barrel to Spain since Gibraltar was once a part of Spain before Britain sized it militarily and kept it as a British outpost in the region. But even so Britain doesn’t look good either in this since its stance is one that Gibraltar is forever British and that Gibraltarians have an inviolate right as to whether they remain British or not. So to hell with Spain’s claim of sovereign integrity; however the same Britain has no such regard for the democratic wishes of the Crimean people because what they want doesn’t tie in with the geopolitical wishes of Britain’s puppet master the United States of America.



Frankly, all this has absolutely nothing to do with the wishes let alone the best interests of the people directly involved or the countries they live in and which are either unhappily or unwillingly implicated in this ludicrous political tug of war, but rather everything to do with western global hegemony and geopolitical interests. And if breaking up sovereign states or supporting the nebulous or even the non-existent claims of non-state entities under the rather spurious guise of affording them the right to self-determination or even independence, ploys that serve the goals of these western state players, then in the minds of their leaders and those of their satrapies self-determination and all the rest of it become paramount; must be respected; vigorously encouraged; and most certainly adhered to by any means at the west’s disposal. However, when it’s not in the west’s own self-interests identical situations must be instantly condemned and those supporting them dishonestly and virulently vilified.



In his justified attack on Angela Markel’s speech in the Bundestag and her fraudulently contrived bellicosity against Russia and the Crimean people Gregor Gysi pointed out that when Germany and its NATO partners were championing Kosovo’s unilateral independence and then actually recognized it a full two years before the UN did so, he’d warned his parliamentary colleagues and most specifically the German government that they and the rest of the west involved in what was going on were literally opening a Pandora’s Box through sanctioning this illegal action, and whose repercussions would not only set a dangerous political precedence but also backfire on all of its participants and supporters.



Notwithstanding this they’d all refused to listen to him Gregor Gysi went on, additionally caught up he explained in their hubristic self congratulations and backslapping of each other on what they saw as their successful efforts at having forced upon the USSR its own dissolution, and entirely buoyed up by this undoubtedly considered themselves to be the Invincibles capable of doing no wrong and in effect very much entitled in the circumstances to unchallenged embark on whatever they chose to, regardless of how reckless or criminal these activities were. The major problem with this being that the nightmare they created has come back to haunt them.



For if they genuinely believe that what they instigated and that subsequently actually transpired in Kosovo, Sudan, the Falkland Islands, Gibraltar and with the west’s active participation or approval at its worst will take place in Scotland in September 2014 is just and fair, why using the same criteria is it wrong for Crimea and other territories or regions like the Basque country and Catalonia to likewise be free and entitled to choose their own self-determination?



And who that saw his performance can forget David Cameron’s smug and hubristic remarks as he gleefully rubbed salt into the wounds of Argentina’s incumbent President, in the same way that a feral and unsophisticated moron would pull the wings of a live butterfly, when he said that the Falkland Islanders had in their referendum spoken and in doing so had unequivocally made their choice to be British; a clear-cut decision for self-determination David Cameron went on to say that the Argentinean President should both respect and recognize. A fait accompli in other words, notwithstanding the long running dispute between the UK and Argentina over these islands, also known as the Islas Malvinas, that are on Argentina’s continental se shelf but over 8000 miles away from Britain.



But David Cameron is not alone in this kind of hypocrisy which has been par for the course with every US president in living memory and includes the incumbent holder of that office Barrack Obama who likewise mouthed ad nauseum the same self-serving and dishonest mantra as and when required to mask their numerous, profoundly unconstitutional and undoubted criminal activities. For example no one asked the indigenous inhabitants of Diego Garcia and the rest of the Chagos Islands whether or not they wanted to be ethnically cleansed in the 1960s from their homeland and for it to be turned into yet another US overseas military base on the main island of Diego Garcia,



The result of a secret bilateral deal between a dominant US calling, or rather dictating the shots to a subservient Britain because the former arrogantly wanted to have the Diego Garcia location for a military base, yet another overseas one with no comparable quid pro quo situation foreign military bases to be legally permitted on US soil. A situation made relatively easy due to the fact that consecutive post World War II UK governments and the British elite as well persist in living, even in 2014 as it happens, in a distinctly permanent and patently comatose state of denial, refusing to accept that Britain no longer rules the world and the days of the Raj, Bwana and Memsahib are gone forever.



So to keep up the pretence, like a lady of leisure who’s fallen on hard times, Britain and France too have facilitated the US becoming their sugar daddy, willingly allowing it to use them both for its own ends while enabling them in turn to bizarrely delude themselves that life for them hasn’t changed at all from what it actually previously was even though in reality it’s altogether quite different. A ludicrous delusion that has Britain and France thinking that they’re still world powers, and with permanent seats and vetoes in the United Nations Security Council reinforcing that view, with the absolute right, albeit with US sanction, to run the world regardless of whether or not those that are targeted for this dubious honour actually wanting to be singled out in this way.



And listening closely to what passed for a debate in the United Nations Security Council’s chamber on Thursday 13 March 2014 where an essentially warm welcome was given to an illegitimate coup leader heading an illegal Nazi, fascist, murderous and bloodthirsty regime in Kiev, quite unsurprisingly so it must be said when apart from Russia and China all the currently members of the UNSC, including the US, UK and France as permanent and veto wielding members, are western, white Caucasian states and satrapies, while wholesale condemnation by these cretins were hurled at Russia for what are basically its fictional violations of international laws and the rest of it vis-à-vis Crimea. While at the same time declaring Crimea’s upcoming and republic-wide plebiscite and Russia’s support for this as illegal. To be honest with you that really turns logic on its head.



This notwithstanding the fact that not only Britain but also the EU, US and the west generally still refuse to countenance let alone acknowledge or accede to the wish for the return of their country and the desire for self-determination by the overwhelming majority of the Chaggossian people brutally treated and savagely evicted en masse and without compensation from their homeland by Britain at the behest of the United States and their swift replacement by a US military base on Diego Garcia, have routinely seen these actions that manifestly and blatantly violate international law declared as illegal by the UK’s highest court with a binding recommendation by it that the Chaggossians be given back their homeland and resettled there at Britain’s expense.



Legal rulings however that consecutive UK governments have contemptuously ignored over the past decades using the antiquated Royal Prerogative to arbitrarily and without parliamentary oversight, not that our MPs or House of Lords members care a damn either about the Chaggossians or would have acted any differently, to override the UK’s Supreme Court’s rulings in the same way that these PMs and government ministers have used the same Royal Prerogative to grant immunity from prosecution to Northern Ireland terrorists and even Royal Pardons to some of them who were properly convicted in court and jailed.



And Britain is most certainly not alone in its contempt for the UK’s courts relative to their rulings on the Chaggossian issue. The United States also does the same. For having turned these paradisiacal settings into an integral part of their illegal rendition programme: unlawful kidnappings, torture and even the murder in other words of those unfortunate enough to be caught up in the US’s war on terror, the United States has additionally throughout its presence on the Chagos islands and as it still does in 2014 continues to add gross insult to injury not only to the Chaggossians but also British MPs, other UK parliamentarians, members of the British public and curiously even Her Majesty the Queen who is the constitutional Head of State of the Chagos Islands, in prohibiting them all or anyone else for that matter from setting foot anywhere on the Chagos islands without the express permission of the United States President, Secretary of Defence or specified senior military commanders based at the Pentagon.



Permission that is rarely ever granted; creating a situation where British citizens or officials can’t visit what are in international law legally British overseas territories. Can you believe it? And do you think that the US government or people would in anyway tolerate any such situation taking place in reverse by a foreign power in Puerto Rico, Guam or the US Virgin Islands for example? So all the ranting and sanctimonious humbug loquaciously emanating from moronic amateurs like Samantha Power, Victoria Nuland, John Kerry and the rest of them is so much noxious shit that there just wouldn’t be sufficient sewerage plants across the entirety of Britain, the rest of the EU, the United States or for that matter the western world to contain and clean up if it were actually human bodily waste disposal instead of the verbal diarrhoea that these consummate prats and jackasses are simply crapping the rest of the world with.



I began with Angela Merkel and will end with her. However, before I do let me state unequivocally that British though I am I nevertheless have a profound love for Germany, the German people and thoroughly enjoy my stay in Germany and nothing, not even a Chancellor like Angela Merkel will ever change or mar any of this. All the same that won’t stop me from outspokenly speaking truth to power no matter where such abuses take place. Angela Merkel is a product of her upbringing as are most of us in one way or another. Her parents who voluntarily left what was then West Germany went with the entire family to live in communist East Germany. That was a committed choice and not one that was forced upon them. In her youth and as a student Angela Markel worked as an informant for the Stasi that employed the same tactics as the Nazis did in unified Germany during World War II. As an adult Angela Merkel continued her covert work with the Stasi and benefited enormously. However always the skilful survivor and egotistical with it Angela Merkel was astute enough as the collapse of the USSR loomed and the Berlin Wall came down to reinvent herself.



In this regard Angela Merkel acted exactly like the Nazi enthusiast and Austrian camp commander Kurt Waldheim who masked all his Nazi past and post World War II portrayed himself as a having been a staunch anti-Nazi activist during the war; a persona he used with US, British and French help to become Secretary General of the United Nations. And if you seem surprised by this let’s remember that these three aforementioned entities of the UK, United States and France assisted many prominent and even quite odious wartime Nazis when doing so coincided with their own selfish interests and the figure of those helped literally run into the thousands. At Nuremburg only those convenient for giving the United States, Britain and France the fig leaf that they were determinedly against Nazism in all its manifestations and were unwavering in their efforts to eradicating it were tried in these show trials and expediently executed. You mightn’t know this but apart from the many prominent Nazis that the US not only covertly took in but also helped to develop new lives for themselves in Latin America, over 175,000 of them from Ukraine’s Waffen SS Brigades along with their families were relocated to the UK at the United Sates’ insistence, and where their descendants live to this day and go around calling themselves the English Defence League and pretending they’re more English than the rest of us.



Still Nazi at heart like their parents and grandparents the US had them resettled in the UK as it had these delusions that after the end of World War II the US could use these odious bastards with their pathological hatred of everything Russian to be the foot soldiers in the war which US was secretly planning against the Soviet Union. Somewhere along the line commonsense prevailed and that war which would have been a hugely devastating one never occurred, but in its place the Cold War as it came to be known was born. And in case you gotten ahead of yourselves as to where I’m going with this one, yes the Nazis now in power in Kiev thanks to the United States are the very descendants too of those World War II Waffen SS, Ukrainian Nazis that created so much mayhem in Eastern Europe specifically against the Russians and what are now publicly at any rate the US, France and Britain’s post World War II favourite people, although not so at the time, the Jews; with David Cameron even proudly declaring his Zionist Jewish credentials and supposedly Jewish familial links on his recent official visit to Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu in response referring to him as family. Consequently none of what is happening in the Ukraine with its US installed and backed Nazi regime is coincidence or an accident; as it’s simply a case of the wheel, in this case the US’s one, have turned full circle.



Similarly Kurt Waldheim’s meteoric rise in UN politics wasn’t as a result of him duping the US, UK or France; oh no! They already knew who and what he was and like the Nazis currently in charge in Ukraine they knew exactly what he was and moreover what he’s done. After all France had expelled more Jews to Europe’s death camps than any other country and prior to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour the overwhelming majority of Americans were very pro-Nazi; the US government had been consistently supplying Germany’s Third Reich with sophisticated weaponry; ships bringing Jewish refugees from Europe to the United States were refused permission to dock in US harbours and sent back to their ports of origin in mainland Europe where their Jewish passengers ended up in the death ovens that were replete across that continent; one of George W. Bush’s grandfather was the official banker for the German Nazi Party, while the other was deeply involved as were many others of his ilk who were associated with corporations doing the same and either producing or marketing the Zyklon B gas that was used to kill many of the Nazis’ holocaust victims. You could use if you like the famed expression in Death of a Salesman that “Business was Business, but there is no getting away from the fact that the American, the French and British leaders pre and post World War II knew exactly who the real and even the most dirty Nazis were.



An America friend of mine was told me that her country didn’t have any friends just useful idiots that they use and who are expendable if and when the need arises. She was spot on. And to them, the Brits and the French Kurt Waldheim was such a one. This trio knew all along what Kurt Waldheim was but the era of the cold war had begun and therefore the United States of America with Britain and France clinging on the coattails of the new heavyweight on the block felt that their interests would be better served, and particularly so in the UN Security Council that they controlled, in having a hardened Nazi there at the helm so to speak, even if he was publicly pretending to be something that he wasn’t, rather than someone who was a socialist or God forbid a communist; although there was no differentiation between the two where Americans are concerned. And furthermore someone they could control since they knew his past, he knew that they did, and the very last thing that Kurt Waldheim wanted was to be publicly exposed for what he really was. So both sides got what they wanted.



However when the Simon Wiesenthal Foundation exposed Kurt Waldheim for what he was the United States that had engineered his ascendency to the position of UN Secretary General, and let’s be honest here no one gets to be UN Secretary general without the US’s say so, together with Britain and France quickly dropped Kurt Waldheim like a hot potato, risibly pretending for public consumption, and also to cover their asses, that they were terribly shocked by these horrid revelations pertaining to Waldheim claiming that they knew nothing about them or his past which he’d evidently, they also pretended, kept from them; which to put it mildly was bloody lie! But since when has shamelessly and openly lying to the world or even their own people ever worried these western hypocrites? And with bigger fish to fry, among this scenario being that of not upsetting the growing and increasingly powerful Zionist lobbies, Kurt Waldheim was ingloriously sacrificed. Check out for yourselves what happened to him.



Having like Kurt Waldheim meticulously reinvented herself Angela Merkel happily jumped on board Helmut Kohl’s bandwagon; a quid pro quo situation for both of them. Kohl for his part wanted to be seen as the re-unifier of Germany and have that as his political legacy, Merkel just wanted initially to bury her nefarious Stasi past all the deeper than she’d already done so far, and having got away with that became emboldened enough to even openly challenge and usurp the leadership of Helmut Kohl whom she viciously stabbed in the back to get her way with Helmut Kohl never managing to get over this appalling betrayal of hers. Now this incredibly self-serving and highly ambitious woman could even emulate Kurt Waldheim and pragmatically aspire in her case to become the leader and also the first female chancellor of a reunified Germany and with few people knowing anything about her Stasi past. After all many Nazis, and not only Kurt Waldheim, did the same reinvention of themselves even pretending to be Jews and emigrating to the United States with New York alone full of such people. Since these Nazis knew the Jews that they betrayed or even killed quite intimately as they were their close neighbours or friends and therefore knew most things about them. Likewise Stasi members in relation to ordinary members of the East German public.



But we all know from whistleblower Edward Snowden’s revelations that the NSA spied extensively on Angela Merkel and with good reason from their standpoint; they knew who and what she really is, and with the United States fixated about communists they were simply treating her in reverse if you like as they did Kurt Waldheim before his public exposure. Now it’s not at all rocket science, so do ask yourselves honestly why when the US has spied on Angela Merkel so intensely does she none the less go out on a limb to fight the same US’s corner as she’s doing in the case of Crimea well aware that any resultant fractured relations with Russia a major trading partner and principal gas supplier to Germany will certainly damage Germany’s economy; and as Chancellor of Germany surely the well being of the Germany people should be the paramount equation in all of her deliberations?



The truth is that Angela Merkel has no choice. We all know that she power hungry and ruthless with it; likes being Chancellor of Germany and doesn’t want to end up if she confronts the United States like the Communist East German equivalent in her case of the Austrian Nazi Kurt Waldheim, exposed and disgraced; for it quite apparent to anyone with a functioning brain in his or her head that Angela Merkel has privately been given an ultimatum by the neo-cons in the Washington administration based on the NSA’s comprehensive snooping on her and which she can’t possibly ignore; support the United States in its Ukraine campaign against Russia or else.



And if you think that scenario is so much crap then ask yourselves this: if you publicly discover that a close friend or family member despicably betrayed your trust in them and went on to gratuitously spy on you and not only compromised your personal privacy but your integrity as a human being as well, would you taking all that into consideration go out of your way and on to a limb for that person unless you knew, because they told you, or else you suspected they had much more compromising dirt on you that they could publicly reveal and quite literally devastatingly destroy you? Blackmail in other words! A situation that becomes even more intriguing in Angela Merkel’s case since the German newspaper Der Tagesspiegel having canvassed the German public for their personal views on Angela Merkel’s stance relative to Russia and the Crimea revealed that a whopping 80% of the German public strongly disagree with her approach. I rest my case!

By Stanley Collymore



In 2010 The UN International Court of Justice declared Kosovo’s unilateral declaration of independence to be legal and not breaking any international laws. As President of the United States Roosevelt declared Latin American dictators as sons of bitches but added they were US SOBs and as such what they did in the interest of the US and under US instigation and supervision was okay.



Crimeans are not or would they allow themselves to be US SOBs and consequently what they do, evidently not in the selfish interests of the US and however democratic their actions are, must unlike what went on in Latin America and elsewhere and is currently happening in Kiev must be dishonestly condemned and vilified as illegal, unconstitutional and against international norms.



This despite the US having bombed Serbia for three months consecutively, NATO having threatened a land invasion of Serbia if it didn’t relinquish Kosovo and when that literally happened at the barrel of a gun the US, its European satrapies and other western client states immediately recognized Kosovo as an independent nation and stated that it was perfectly within its right and under UN rules of self-determination to go independent.



This notwithstanding the fact that Kosovo was an integral and historical part of Serbia that was itself part of a highly functioning, sovereign and independent country called Yugoslavia that the US along with its NATO thugs wilfully destroyed with the primary objectives of expanding NATO’s physical reach and military influence within Europe, silencing any opposition to this and having the US all the more with its obsessive fixation of Russia on the latter’s borders.



So recognizing the manufactured and so-called state of Kosovo organized and run by terrorists there was fine but when it comes to the Crimea which for centuries was an integral: physical, linguistic, cultural and historical, part of Russia and was only transferred in 1954 to the Ukraine, then part of the USSR, by Nikita Khrushchev for strictly administrative reasons, something that goes on in most independent countries, including the UK for example on a regular basis, not imagining for a single moment that the Soviet Union would break up, Crimea stayed with the Ukraine after the dissolution of the USSR as an autonomous republic but with close ties still with Russia and unsurprisingly so since the overwhelming majority of Crimeans are ethnic Russians.



However after the west’s blatant engineering of a Nazi and Fascist putsch in Kiev that doesn’t even have the majority support of the Ukrainian people the Crimeans decided to exercise their right to determine their own future through the act of self-determination and for good measure as well also invoked the UN International Court of Justice’s ruling in 2010 relative to Kosovo and which the entire west went along with, we nevertheless immediately see the west’s double standards and hubristic hypocrisy come into play.



Terrorists can arbitrarily and undemocratically take over and independently rule Kosovo without Serbia’s approval or cooperation it seems and that’s fine by the west; however when autonomous Crimea gives its people the right to democratically decide their future in a state-wide plebiscite with one of the options being the severance of the Crimea from the Ukraine to which it’s only loosely attached anyway, and even when this move invokes the United Nations ICJ ruling in 2010 re Kosovo and wholeheartedly approved by the west as previously said, lo and behold Crimea is instantly damned by the same west that embraced Kosovo for what it did as acting illegally, unconstitutionally and against international law. You couldn’t make stuff like that up! So work it out for yourselves you manipulated idiots across the west.



Furthermore, US law strictly prohibits the United States from funding regimes anywhere globally that came to power by a putsch, coup or any other undemocratic means. Yet the US shells out billons of dollars that it can ill afford to the military in Egypt that overthrew a democratically elected government there and is now hell-bent on forking out an additional billion dollar sweetener to its favourite Nazi and Fascist mass murderers in Kiev that have done the same and de facto the US’s bidding; a country that along with the EU countries have been very complicit in the meddling of Ukraine’s domestic affairs from the very outset.



But guess what? The US, its EU and NATO satrapies, one and the same, refuse to acknowledge what is patently obvious to everyone else with eyes in their heads and a functioning brain to boot that those running the show in Cairo and Kiev on behalf of the west aren’t by any stretch of the imagination democratic entities and what’s more their rise to power was by means that contradict US law regarding their funding. But what does the US that sickeningly, sanctimoniously and ad nauseum preaches democracy to those it disdainfully looks down upon really care, since to these arrogant morons in Washington might is right.



Akin to the BBC’s bosses refusing to acknowledge that they were well aware of many if not the majority of Jimmy Savile’s paedophile activities that took place on BBC property and resolutely did nothing to stop him or report the matter to the police, because to honestly do so would destroy the dishonest image that the BBC likes to portray of itself. Or for that matter prominent UK government ministers and other elites demanding that the already poor and financially hard up residents of the UK tighten their fiscal belts, accept the austerity measures they either insist on or implement; as well as the swingeing cuts in financing, crucial medical and social services that these disadvantaged are reliant on, while they the British elite, already stinking rich as they are, callously employ the most intricate and creative means of tax evasion to hold on to what they already have while simultaneously garnering even more wealth for themselves, their families and their friends at the expense of the rest of us.



Finally, sensible individuals know and sadly recognize that the world is truly, bizarrely and dangerously out of sync when the likes of Bob Crow: honest to a fault, replete with integrity and who all of his adult life committed himself tirelessly to the betterment of the average working man and particularly those in the trade union that he was leader of, the RMT, against the pernicious greed of the capitalist elites who would otherwise without his endeavours have had them kept in what they arrogantly considered were their place, ironically suffers an untimely death from a heart attack while consummately evil bastards of the infamous calibre of those who run the world and particularly the globally obsessed and hegemonic-minded pillocks in control of the west continue to live. Maybe God knows something that he’s not letting on to us mere mortals.

By Stanley Collymore



Anyone who was either delusionally under the impression or actually believed that the west and in particular its highly paid bunch of professional lying mafia, most notably John Kerry were telling the truth of a vicious Ukrainian regime under the democratically elected President Yanukovich was systematically mowing down innocent, naïve and defenceless Ukrainian civilians and even members of that country’s police for their own gratuitous and self-serving ends are in my view in dire need of individual lobotomies, for those of us who know what the west is all about, the lengths it will go to in order to get what it wants and are also au fait with its modus operandi clearly saw all that at work and knew precisely whose handiwork was on display; namely and firmly that of the west.



That’s why the prized idiots who rely heavily or exclusively on the twisted narratives of the west’s corporate and even state broadcasting media mouthpieces should be grateful for the revelation of the leaked telephone conversation between the Estonian Foreign Minster, who was actually on the ground in Kiev and knew exactly what was going on, and Catherine Ashton the jobsworth, unelected and so-called Foreign Minister not even of the EU but the equally unelected EU Commission, in which the Estonian FM unequivocally stated that neither Yanukovich nor anyone in his government was responsible for using snipers to kill both the Ukrainian police or civilians but that that responsibility and its attendant criminality lay firmly with members of the cabal of Nazis, Fascists and others of their ilk who with western backing organised the putsch against the elected Ukrainian government.



Obviously this conversation wasn’t meant for the ears of the Ukrainian people, those in the west or the authentic global community for that matter and has of course proved very embarrassing for Catherine Ashton, whose only response was “oh gosh” and then resolutely refused to even discuss the matter when asked to do so by the alternative world media; something she would have had no problems with at all in loquaciously vilifying and calling for a tough response if the boot had been on the other foot and it was some other country that had organized a coup in one of the west’s satrapies, let’s say Bantu Saudi, Qatar or some European state for that matter. But such mindboggling hypocrisy and double standards come with the territory of jobsworths like Catherine Ashton and of course the west that she’s clearly a puppet and mouthpiece for.



But let’s digress briefly and imagine that such conduct by so-called peaceful protestors as John Kerry lyingly referred to them, as and was evidently not the case, was happening in the US or Europe. The entire world witnessed in horror the systematic, highly co-ordinated both at state and federal levels, and the utterly brutal crackdown that took place against genuinely peaceful Wall Street Movement protestors and campus sit-down student ones in the US and also as well in Britain with no hold back whatsoever of this outright brutality on the part of the government in the US or here in the UK against those that they targeted; and one can clearly envisage what their immediate response would be if these protestors were throwing Molotov cocktails at the forces of law, firing live bullets at them, occupying government buildings in Washington or London and using expertly trained snipers to target both civilians and members of the police and having overseas sponsors of them blaming such acts on the UK or US government.



The same response would occur wherever it took place in the EU or any NATO country, and self-defence and restoring the rule of law would be the recurrent mantra used by both these western governments, their law enforcement agencies and their media mouthpieces. But when it’s they who’re fomenting the problems in other peoples’ countries and using their murderous thugs to bring about regime change in countries they don’t like or whose rulers refuse to bend the knee of supplication or obeisance to their geopolitical and global hegemonic interests then what takes place is seen by these barbaric and incorrigible morons as perfectly alright, and with them adding insult to the injury already caused by classifying the actions of these murderous thugs as the democratic aspirations of the people, who at best are duped or else play no part in these obscenities, that these western states headed by the US and NATO want to subjugate.



NATO is a self perpetuating cancer in the human body politic and was created on a deliberate lie; set up to prevent communist parties from coming to power in Europe not to protect Europe from the then Soviet Union, as the US knew perfectly well that the Soviet Union had no wish to invade western Europe; and it’s this same lie even with the Soviet Union having collapsed and Russia and its former constituent parts no longer communist entities that the US and its EU satrapies persist with and would like nothing better than to get their hands on Crimea and the naval facilities there, all the better to be militarily on Russia’s doorstep. As such this rabid and childish obsession on the part of the US that is still evident in 2014 lives on, with the US like an inveterate old whore totally unable to come to terms with the fact that the highpoint days of her prostitution are permanently behind her. And to back up this obsession we’ve seen the US embark on a number of global false flags which it then criminally and stupidly seeks to condemn as the work of others.



Here are some of them. The US orchestrated Operation Gladio in Europe post World War II in order to carry out atrocities against civilians there and blame these on the communists. The ploy worked successfully in countries like Italy, Spain, France, Portugal and Greece. Other infamous false flags in which the US was also involved are: Operation Northwood: the plan to cause the invasion of Cuba; the Israeli attack in 1967 on the US Liberty in a dastardly and blatant attempt in which several US naval servicemen on board were killed to draw the US into the war between Israel and its Arab neighbours by blaming this attack on Israel’s foes. Even to this day the US is tight lipped about this matter and refuses to even contemplate compensating the relatives of those who were slaughteded in this manner.



The Gulf of Tonkin affair; a US ploy that resulted in the dishonest attack on Laos, Cambodia and of course North Vietnam. The CIA attack on a night club in Berlin and also the downing and destruction of the 1988 Pan AM flight over Lockerbie in order to blame Libya for this and provide the US with a false and disreputable excuse to attack Libya that had become a thorn in its side. The attack and invasion of the tiny Caribbean island of Grenada, no navy or air force, and so much for this prized bully picking on those weaker than itself yet Grenada held the mighty US off for two weeks; also the ousting, with the complicit and subservient help of Britain, of the democratically elected government of Dr. Cheddi Jagon of what was then British Guiana simply because as would later happen with Grenada these Caribbean affiliated and actual countries of that hemisphere had the temerity in the US’ eyes to forge diplomatic, cultural and economic links with Cuba, another Caribbean territory; tantamount to some country with the muscle to do so telling the US that it shouldn’t have any ties whatsoever with Mexico or Canada that are its close neighbours simply because the country doing so feels it can do what it likes and doesn’t for purely perverse reasons like either Canada or Mexico.



There are numerous other examples of these US double standards: the premeditated break up of Yugoslavia; the systematic bombing of Serbia along with sustained threats to invade that country if it didn’t surrender to the US and NATO’s ultimatum and demands that Serbia relinquished Kosovo which was a historical and integral part of Serbia followed by their unilateral recognition of Kosovo as an independent country, no democracy involved here mind. A fait accompli through the barrel of the gun which fast forward to 2014 Jackass John Kerry is literally and fallaciously accusing Russia of when the Crimean people democratically state that they will hold a referendum to determine their own future. Actions in the case of the break up of Yugoslavia embarked on with the specific objective of Balkanizing the Balkans into weak, vulnerable and manageable entities in what during the Soviet Union era were distinctly and voluntarily under the USSR’s sphere of influence.



Then there’s Sudan where the oil rich south of that country was orchestrated by the west into splitting from the sovereign and independent country of Sudan with a similar pattern of destabilization and fragmentation in Iraq, Libya and Syria, still ongoing. Egypt too where the US didn’t like the outcome of democracy there and decided to put the Egyptian military back into power. Then there are the African countries the US is interfering with in a very heavy-handed fashion as it did in the past with the Congo, Ethiopia and Somalia, and is currently still doing. And how about the Philippines where the US wiped out over a third of its population in a war with that country simply because the people there wanted to be free of the US shackles. And who can forget the US’s interference in Korea, where another false flag was used to instigate the Korean War which is still simmering to this day. And I haven’t even begun to touch Latin America and the US meddling and also its military interventions either directly or through surrogates in all of Latin America: the horrendously brutal Condor operations there with their thousands of disappeared civilians, the military interventions in Chile, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Panama, Mexico: most of the Southern USA and particularly states like Texas and California once belonged to Mexico that was denuded of them through US false flags and subsequent attacks and wars with Mexico and the list goes on globally relative to US infamy and barbaric subjugation of other countries..



A power obsessed entity with over 100 military bases in well over 139 countries, considerably more than the rest of the entire world combined yet not satisfied with what it already has and blaming as 19th Century sovereign usurpers countries that don’t have any bases outside their own territories. Crimea for centuries was always geographically and culturally part of Russia until 1954 when Nikita Khrushchev in an organizational arrangement, no different from the British government splitting the once unitary county of Sussex into West and East Sussex, allocated it under those terms to neighbouring Ukraine never expecting that the Soviet Union, that Ukraine was a part of then would break up. But that did happen and that’s how Crimea, where the people are overwhelmingly ethnic Russian and consider themselves to be closely connected to Russia linguistically and in every other way, came to be politically linked to Crimea after the breakup of the Soviet Union. But what I find absolutely astounding is that if the US under false pretences could invade Grenada to rescue a handful of US students there who were in no danger and said so when they were involuntarily taken back to the US, why is it wrong for Russia, even if it chose to and we know it hasn’t done so, to go into next door Crimea to protect its own kith and kin?



And talk about Russia having a base in Ukraine and abusing this to the detriment of the Ukrainian people, what poppycock. Russia is there legally through an agreement negotiated between Russia and Ukraine and for which Russia pays quite handsomely for those facilities. Contrast that situation with Guantanamo Bay where the US illegally occupies part of the sovereign territory of Cuba despite Cuba for decades now saying it doesn’t want the US on its soil. And what is the US’s response? That it made a binding agreement with the puppet regime of Cuba in the 19th century when the Cuban people had no say in how their country was run and therefore the US can stay there and do what it likes regardless of what the legitimate wishes of the Cuban people or their government are in 2014. Can you imagine an elected government of Britain or Germany, where the US also has bases, asking for their land back where these bases are and for the US to quit and this asinine argument the US uses relative to Cuba being used and the US allowed to get away with it, and moreover use these bases in the way it uses Guantanamo Bay as a legal black hole to do whatever criminal activity it wants to pursue? Don’t hold your breath looking for an answer on that one as we all know what the outcome would be.



But what really did it for me was seeing Haaretz the Israeli so-called liberal newspaper condemning Russia and praising the Nazi thugs that now run Ukraine and one of the first things they did was to un-ban all Nazi and fascist symbols. Over 22 million Russians died fighting Nazism and Fascism in Europe and their relatives must be fuming with anger and asking themselves why when twats like those on the Haaretz, who wouldn’t have been alive had it not been for these Russian sacrifices in Eastern Europe and beyond, can act in this way? My own relatives fought against Nazism and Fascism and I too am asking myself why they did when prized assholes like those in Israel of all places can behave in this shameful manner.



As for John Kerry this man isn’t just a moron but also a schizophrenic sociopath. Born to parents who were ethnic European Jews that escaped the European holocaust and fled to the US on arriving there found themselves in a situation similar to that of jumping out of the frying pan into the fire since pro-German Nazi sentiments were also rife in the US until the attack on Pearl Harbour. Kerry’s parents anglicized themselves pretended to be Christians and through basic survival instincts hid their Jewishness from those they daily came in contact with. Even John Kerry didn’t know about any of this until he was well into adulthood.



Brought up as a Christian he’s an avowed Zionist, not to be confused with Judaism, since many decent Jews abhor Zionism while many of Zionism’s rabid supporters are so-called Christians like John Kerry and Senator John McCain, and it should be firmly remembered that John Kerry was even more hawkish than John McCain in calling for a US attack on Syria which was only narrowly averted through Russian mediation. So essentially John Kerry apart from being a prime sociopath and schizophrenic is equally with it a classic case of someone suffering as well from Stockholm syndrome. And all that crap of his about Russia behaving like a 19th Century aggressor and how civilized countries don’t invade others on phoney pretexts, where was this prized asshole, his media cheerleaders and their equally bankrupt EU leaders and others when Grenada, Iraq, Libya et al occurred? Maybe they should have a close look at themselves in their own mirrors.



Finally, I’d like to close with this statement. “How can you trust those who are arming the counter revolutionaries in Bahrain; who illegally invaded Iraq and whose destabilization of that country is causing numerous deaths there on a daily basis; and along with the invasion and lengthy occupation of Afghanistan, far longer than World Wars I and II combined, are directly responsible for all the consequences we already know of in those two countries alone: Over one million Iraqis killed, 7 million displaced and hundreds of thousands killed in Afghanistan and the border areas of Pakistan, with similar daily massacres and drone assassination murders in Yemen, Libya, Somalia and elsewhere in the world, to be thought of much less be accepted as the liberators of the global community? It’s a contradiction in terms and you don’t have to be a genius to work that out!”



And how can the people of Crimea transparently taking a democratic path to determine their own future be condemned by the west as illegal yet the murderous Nazi thugs and fascist sniper killers the west has put in power by means that by no stretch of the imagination can remotely be called democratic, since a putsch never is and that’s what it was that ousted the democratically elected President of the Ukraine and his government there and in which the overwhelming majority of ordinary Ukrainians, particularly those in the East of the country and specifically in Crimea played no part at all be arrogantly and self-righteously declared as democratic and legitimate? Have these criminal western leaders no conscience or morality? Obviously not!

By Stanley Collymore



There was a time not that long ago when uppity niggers that either insulted the sensitivities or in anyway impeded the exceptionalism of their alleged white Caucasian and superior masters they would be summarily gotten hold of beaten and tortured unmercifully and while an empathetic crowd of fellow, white Caucasians were swiftly gathered up, party atmosphere forbidden, for the resultant spectacle publicly lynched to everyone’s rapturous delight, except that of the poor Nigger of course. Naturally there were variations on this tried and rather trusted theme, like the British armed forces and the colonial administration in Kenya prior to that country’s independence, when the locals, significant numbers of whom had only recently returned from Europe where they’d gone to fight Nazism on Britain’s behalf, were campaigning for their own independence from the UK. Then it was quite routine to round up men, women and children, confine them to fortified stockades and with them securely inside, liberally douse them all with petrol and set them ablaze, leaving them to die a most agonizing death.



Oh the good old days when whites were in charge and Blacks knew their place. Now we have a throwback from that era one so-called Justice Sweeney who obviously hasn’t a clue of what the term barbaric means venting his spleen in similar colonial fashion. He couldn’t order that Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale who’re both of East African descent to be lynched or burnt alive, although it’s quite evident that’s where he was coming from, but he could do the next best thing. And he did. Sentencing two men who did not contest that they had killed a British soldier; after all, they’d courageously waited at the scene of their activity for the police to arrive and did what they felt they had to do very much in the open.



From the very outset Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale openly stated that their crime was a politically motivated one brought on by the political and genuinely barbaric crimes that Britain, along with its white western partners and Arab surrogates are carrying out in the Global South. And as far as I am concerned these are the real acts of terrorism not what the two Michaels did, which politically motivated as their action was it was no more a terrorist act than the killing of Baby P by his mother. But terrorism isn’t something that the likes of Nigel Sweeney and Co attribute to whites regardless of where these acts take place.



When Andreas Breivik the Norwegian mass murderer and terrorist carried out his odious crimes western governments and their sycophantic media quickly and justly branded these acts terroristic and the person behind them as a terrorist instinctively jumping to the conclusion that that individual was Non-white and they would be able to jump on their racist hobby horse. But the moment it became clear that Breivik was White Caucasian all that stopped and the word terrorist was instantaneously dropped from their vocabulary, limited at best, and never used again; not even during his subsequent trial, conviction and sentencing. But the two Michaels in the minds of these perverse sickos: among them the judiciary, Crown Prosecution Service, government, Cabinet ministers, official opposition, media et al, none the less fall squarely into the category of terrorist because it goes with the territory.



Yet as Nigel Sweeney was instinctively jumping up onto his sanctimonious soapbox and manifestly grandstanding as his sort does, and more suitable to be a judge in an X-Factor charade than any genuine court that I know of , the same judiciary that he represents was sabotaging and throwing out a real life terrorist outrage that also took place in London. This outrage was the infamous Hyde Park bombing in 1982, and before I proceed any further on that matter it should be pointed out that there is no statute of limitation on murder within the UK. Anyway this evidently terrorist act resulted in the death of several people including FOUR British soldiers, not the one that Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale randomly targeted and killed and was just one many such terrorist activities carried out by Northern Ireland terrorists on the British mainland with recurring multiple deaths resulting from them. But guess what? The perpetrator of this terrorist act can’t be prosecuted because he has a letter from the previous UK government precluding this from happening. In effect, it’s all part of a covert deal undertaken by British regimes that include the present David Cameron and Nick Clegg coalition one to give letters of exemption and outright amnesty to these Northern Ireland terrorists to stop them being prosecuted for their terrorist activities.



Hundreds of such letters have been handed out by these British regimes; 38 of them since 2010 when the present government took office and the latest of them in 2013. In addition, Northern Irish terrorists that have been convicted of terrorist crimes involving the death of civilians, members of the police forces as well as the armed services have also been granted Royal Pardons. An ongoing situation secretly known to the British judiciary, the CPS, the British government and opposition of course and several others; all of whom are now rather pathetically and highly embarrassingly trying to pass the buck elsewhere as these fucking cowards always do when caught in a bind. There’s even talk that these are historic crimes and that these amnesties were altruistically granted to promote peace in Northern Ireland. What utter tosh; and how the hell can something as recent as 1982 be deemed historic? But some of these Northern Irish terrorist acts that were carried out there and on mainland UK have occurred since 1982 and of course prior to that time.



And what I find particularly sickening is that these ignorant assholes, everyone one of them, as they jump up on their sanctimonious high horse regarding Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale and how evil they are cannot even bring themselves in 2014 to regard these terrorists acts carried out by these white Northern Irish terrorists as what they really were or refer to what is going on in Northern Ireland as a civil war. Since these pathetic fuckers still refer to them as the troubles. Anywhere else, and particularly so in the Global South in countries that the UK and west don’t like, and where they foment their customary insurrections, any such situation would immediately and decisively be categorized as a civil war; but not Northern in Ireland where it has been going on for decades or the entire island of Ireland for over a century. That’s the kind of blatant hypocrisy and double standards that are replete in the mindset of members of the British judiciary like Nigel Sweeney and the political apparatchiks who pull their sycophantic strings. And in those circumstances how can anyone with a functioning brain in their head or even an iota of commonsense have any respect for such patent nerds and particularly the judiciary, as everyone already knows the MO of your average politician let alone those who make it into government, so corrupt that they’ve become the laughing stock of the civilized world.



Little wonder then that Northern Ireland’s First Minister, Peter Robinson is quite furious and threatening resignation if there’s not a cast iron guarantee from the British government that a judicial inquiry is promptly set up to discover why these shady and disreputable deals between Westminster based governments, the CPS and the judiciary were forged in the first place without the awareness of the legitimate and devolved government of Northern Ireland that has responsibility for such matters but wasn’t informed and was evidently kept firmly in the dark about them. Why the damning secrecy if these bastards involved in these covert deals were acting within the law, which they clearly weren’t!



No one in his or her right mind was in any doubt about the outcome of the case involving Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale; least of all they themselves. But the post haste manner in which this clearly show case trial with all its kangaroo elements was undertaken leaves a pretty awful taste in the mouth. Contrast this approach with that studiously adopted in the case of Stephen Lawrence where for over of 20 years everything was done to thwart justice for him, his parents and supporters. And when a prized asshole like Nigel Sweeney can sit in the Old Bailey and talk about the dignity of this dead soldier’s family, my natural reaction was, what about the incomparable dignity of Doreen and Neville Lawrence which was nefariously and in many others respects deliberately trampled on. Fat good it did either of them. And apart from the Daily Mail, a supposedly rightwing newspapers, no one in the white establishment or the rest of the British media per se gave a shit, and that was most evident in the case of the of the judiciary, the CPS, the Met Police, other UK police forces, the UK government and parliamentarians alike that the entire world now knows through its indebted thanks to an undercover police whistleblower tasked with this nasty piece of work had individually as well as collectively done everything in their power to thwart justice for Stephen as well as unwarrantedly smear his parents, family and supporters.



Now this Jackass Nigel Sweeney and the British media, particularly Sky on the day of the sentencing of Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale, were in an utter feeding frenzy with stupid bitches like Kay Burley who has racist form, as she was very dismayed that two of Stephen Lawrence’s killers had eventually been convicted for his murder after the quite inordinate time that had elapsed following his murder dismissively saying on air that it was a long time ago, but on the actual day of the sentencing of Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale was conspicuously besides herself with delight, going on ad nauseum about the dead soldier’s family and the dreadful trauma for them and despite that their extraordinary dignity shown in the face of this barbarity inflicted on them when no such sentiments were ever advanced by her, or would they have been, in respect of the Lawrence family. And in tandem with her we had Tom Parmenter, another jerk, out for making a name for himself spouting on about this same theme along with other spurious ones.



Knowing about the deal done between Northern Irish terrorists and the British authorities I instinctively asked myself why is okay for two black men who kill a British soldier at home for the very plausible reasons they not only gave but succinctly outlined be given the prison tariffs they got at the hands of Nigel Sweeney when hundreds of known Northern Ireland terrorists were allowed to go scot-free, and are still doing so in 2014, at the express behest of the very same people that asininely claim the actions of Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale were the worst ever by British citizens in the history of the United Kingdom. Hyperbolic or what! For that’s just plain crap! Even so, my query was supported by one of only two Sky Presenters that I have any respect for because he’s professional to the core in what he does and significantly also talk sense; and I’m referring to Eamonn Holmes who was as likewise as flabbergasted as I am that, in his words, Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale could “justifiably” be dispatched to jail for inordinately lengthy periods of time for what they never denied they did while manifestly hard-bitten terrorists from his part of the world, Northern Ireland that commit even viler crimes happily and are casually allowed by the UK judiciary and political authorities to just walk free as they laughingly wave their immunity from prosecution papers given to them under our noses. But like I’ve said earlier the white powers that be who’re in charge of the affairs of the UK increasingly aided and abetted by cretinous members of the British judiciary like Nigel Sweeney don’t with their outmoded colonialist mindset see white terrorism for what it is; as in their rather sick minds whites don’t do terrorism.



Then we hear from Kay Burley and the rest of them that this soldier’s son ought never to have been put in the invidious position of having to grow up without a dad and furthermore knowing how that dad was treated. Joy Gardner when she was brutally killed as was Mark Duggan and several others subjected to the same barbarity customarily visited upon Blacks but that these whites like Kay Burley only deem as such when it’s meted out quite rarely as it happens to whites, all left young children behind and in Mark Duggan’s case four of them; so that calculated and cynical pulling at the heartstring crap I’m afraid doesn’t cut any ice with me. For if the likes of Kay Burley, Nigel Sweeney and the rest of these white exceptionalists don’t want terrorism in the UK then they should as a matter of urgency impress upon their government not to interfere in the domestic affairs of other countries, or even worst still kill their citizens with impunity in their own lands.



The depressing mayhem that the world witnesses on a daily basis in Syria was initially started by Britain two years before the insurrection itself actually broke out; obviously stoked by British Special Forces illegally and covertly sent there by the UK government. The invasion of Iraq was carried out on a premeditated lie in the aftermath of which over one million Iraqis were killed and some seven million of them externally and internally displaced; and Iraq is today a broken and dysfunctional country while Tony Blair and his cohorts who knowingly and deceitfully took Britain into an illegal war with Iraq with all its attendant consequences for personal gain and accordingly while Iraqis continue to endure a nightmare he enthusiastically assisted in creating, in marked contrast benefits handsomely financially from his terrorist crimes. So why the fuck isn’t he in the dock at the Old Bailey at least?



Then there’s Afghanistan and Libya where the worst carpet bombing by the RAF post World War II, when the same thing was done to Dresden and Hamburg, were remorselessly carried out with incredible loss of life. Australia on the other side of the world has troops in Afghanistan. Why? When was the last time that Afghanistan invaded or attacked Australia, a country that has systematically and ruthlessly ethnically cleansed its Aboriginal people? The Aussies are there because they see themselves more as European than as belonging to the South Pacific, and White Caucasian Brits as their kith and kin. So if they can travel to the other side of the world to freely render in rather loose terms familial solidarity with and back Brits fighting yet another unlawful and immoral war in Afghanistan or wherever, why shouldn’t Brits with ancestral links to the Global South do precisely the same, if they’ve a mind to, in respect of their own kith and kin under the Nazi and Fascist jackboot of whites including Brits engaged in terroristic activities in their ancestral homelands?



Doreen Lawrence was and is still the epitome of dignity in respect of the racist murder of her son Stephen, but fat good that has done her with Aidan Burley the racist and Nazi MP for Cannock lambasting the organizers of the Summer Olympics held in London for having her there making the occasion in his words “too multicultural”. Well I instantly took him to task for that remark in an article I wrote and odious as his views are he’s perfectly entitled to his opinion. But I’m also entitled to my own and will express them openly whenever I think it’s necessary to do so and nothing will ever, as long as I draw breath, stop me from ever doing so.



The death of this soldier I willingly and unapologetically admit leaves me cold, just as I’m equally sure that the racist murders of Steve Biko, Stephen Lawrence, Joy Gardner, Jimmy Mubenga and the premeditated execution of Mark Duggan and quite literally the thousands of other Blacks who were likewise executed at the hands of the so-called forces of law and order in the UK similarly affect those whites of all backgrounds that support these sorts of things. So don’t think that just because your arrogant exceptionalism delusionally gives you the idea that you alone have sensitivities that that makes it so; other people do to.



This is a new century and the world has dramatically changed; it has also become a very dangerous place largely due to the ever more, recalcitrant reluctance of significant numbers of whites to accept that Blacks, who either personally or ancestrally and for centuries now have been routinely subjected to the worst atrocities linked to slavery ever since the first boatload of Africans were savagely kidnapped from their indigenous African homeland and involuntarily on their part subsequently shipped to Barbados’ Bridgetown Harbour giving rise in the wake of their abduction to the inception and endemic evils of the Transatlantic Slave Trade, followed by colonialism, Jim Crow laws, segregation, lynching, racism and apartheid, you name it and they were subjected to it, aren’t any longer prepared to accept this kind of shit anymore from any one and particularly white Caucasians that have profited hugely from it.



An eye for an eye might be very biblical in its connotation and it’s readily accepted when the rogue state of Israel applies it; so why not so when Blacks and others from the Global South see what is happening to their families and loved ones there? Because whether you like it or not it will continue and intensify as long as the foreign policies of the UK and the west persist in their current manner. Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale won’t live to see it I’m sure as they’ll be killed off in prison; but then they’re not afraid to die. That’s what that carefully judicial and CPS orchestrated and manipulatively staged managed in the Old Bailey dock charade supervised by Nigel Sweeney and instinctively on cue was amplified by the British print and electronic media was all about.



Play on the old racist stereotypes of Blacks being inherently violent and all the rest of it, then conveneintly at the behest of the powers that be kill them off in jail; wont be the first time something like that happened. Then the likes of Tom Parmenter and Kay Burley can report to their heart’s content that Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale as is their nature viciously attacked their prison guards who had no choice but to defend themselves; very much like the Trayvon Martin scenario, knowing full well that there are enough racist idiots and others out there in Britain willing to believe their racist narrative.



But there’s another biblical adage to consider I would advise, namely that those who live by the sword will also die by it. And no country, far less individuals can be one hundred percent sure of their own safety or that of their families nowadays no matter how elaborate the security measures are, for their security detail has to get it right 100% of the time while the assassin or determined killer only has to do so the once. And guess what? The insurgent killers that Britain trained, financed, sent off to Syria and lavishly facilitated them with all their needs to overthrow the legitimate government of a fellow sovereign and independent state haven’t returned home yet but they’ll do so eventually. And what’s more they’ll make what Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale did look like child’s play.



It would make sense this monstrous display of hatred and racist vilification against Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale if they were spontaneous, directed at them for activities uniquely carried out by them and which profoundly offended the sensitivities of most people, particularly those in the UK. But this is clearly not the case! For these displays of solidarity with the dead soldier and his family ostentatiously and premeditatedly carried out, stem from the direct result of the cynical manipulation by racist, Nazi, fascist, xenophobic, colonialist, imperialist-minded and even Islamophobic forces that pervade the UK right down from the government, judiciary, parliamentarians, CPS, the so-called law enforcement agencies: police and prison officers for example, to the gullible and manipulated foot soldiers, as it were, of far right groups and football hooligans entirely vacuous when it comes down to intelligence or any semblance of prescient mindedness and literally spoiling for a fight to compensate for their myriad and transparently obvious inadequacies.



A situation that is then significantly exacerbated by the fact that the very activities those who are in power in Britain hypocritically fulminate about, decry and openly condemn as totally reprehensible in the UK and state have no place here, they none the less actively encourage, finance and wilfully participate in abroad, most especially in those countries with substantial natural resources that Britain sees as greatly beneficial to its existence as a developed nation and so-called first world player on the global stage, as well as permitting it to geopolitically persist with its delusional intent of imposing its white Caucasian and overarching imperialist hegemony on peoples and countries that quite frankly don’t want or need it.



Meanwhile the west and including Britain carry on refusing to condemn acts of atrocities that are conspicuously terroristic in nature but which nevertheless serve their savage purposes. To this end they’re therefore well aware of the causes of blowback in places like the Middle East and likewise in the west but the answers to these avoidable problems they don’t want to hear, which in turn creates a state of affairs where the US satrapies of the UK and France continue to risibly punch above their weight in international affairs in order to unjustifiably retain their place and veto in the UN Security Council. And backed by the west’s corporate and state media the concerted plan is to maintain this status quo.



Therefore when opponents of this obvious travesty of justice voice their opinions, however moderately this is done, against the west generally and the US in particular for self-servingly encouraging and moreover reinforcing what is basically an unconscionable state of affairs they’re viciously damned as ranting and out of touch with reality; but when the boot is on the other foot, no matter the intensity or rancid nature of the lies, it’s not. Which makes a total mockery of democracy and civilized norms of behaviour that these countries like Britain are always preaching to other people about but don’t practise themselves, and increasingly seem averse to doing so. For if you genuinely believe in human rights you do so regardless of who is violating them or who the victims are.



Günter Meyer of Mainz, Germany: a white Caucasian German and knowledgeable Middle East analyst highlights my previous point when he says about terrorism as a general rule and that carried out specifically in the Middle East: “The leaders of western countries know that their sponsored death squads are completely responsible for the Syrian massacres but take the lying stance of exclusively blaming the Assad government for these and direct the corporate so-called mainstream media to take this official stance.” Then cynically and manipulatively too when an obvious blowback situation like what happened in Woolwich occurs both the government and the media instantly adopt an orchestrated outrage scenario, akin to that of a supposed virgin having, she claims, been sexually violated by a dangerous predator, that they assiduously put in place and self-interestedly exploit for all it’s worth so as to gain sympathy for and divert suspicion away from themselves as the real culprits and the catalyst for what has happened.



Which forcefully hammers home the point and puts into its true context and unquestionably so relative to what is orchestratedly going on around the dead British soldier by those who don’t really give a damn about him or his family but are just conveniently using both these set of circumstances expediently to promote their own nefarious and outright narrow-minded vested interests, that compromising with racists is like embracing a rabid dog and hoping that in doing so such an action will rid that animal of its malady. If you’re sensible you don’t; nor should any rational person, come to that, even try unless they’ve got a profound death wish. And Blacks endeavouring to seek justice in the white racist judicial system is, in the words of the late Malcolm X, analogous to going to the wolves and complaining about the fox raiding the chicken coop. Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale were well aware of this; that’s why they logically acted as they did.



But from the perspective of racist whites with their white supremacist, we’re the superior race and attendant to that colonialist, Colonel Blimp, xenophobic and imperialist mindset it’s much easier to denigrate uncomfortable facts rather than honestly and maturely confront and hard-headedly deal with them, which in turn places Blacks in the untenable situation of being forced to view horrific incidences like the Trayvon Martin case through a set of shared and rather painful experiences and a history that doesn’t go away. Not the sort of thing that the commonsensically brain dead remotely cares about or would ever understand in the unlikely circumstances that he or she did.



Therefore, given this state of affairs it was particularly easy for Nigel Sweeney to hand down the lengthy sentences he subjectively did to Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale, this despite him contradictorily and openly saying in court that they’d killed just one person and it was evident they posed no threat to anyone else including passersby or the police; yet in his next sentence Nigel Sweeney posturing to the family of the dead soldier asininely denounces Michael Adebolajo as a person with “no prospect of rehabilitation” and ideally suited for a whole life tariff and no eligibility for parole.



Judgements arrived at without any appropriate medical or clinical expertise on the part of the man delivering them to support his rant, or for that matter any incontrovertible proof either from appropriately qualified medical or psychological experts and were then transparently and objectively produced in court and which substantiated Nigel Sweeney’s personal opinion that Michael Adebolajo is indeed without any prospect of rehabilitation.



But as unlike the case of a white suspect where proof would not only have been expected to be produced but also firmly demanded as well, Nigel Sweeney was fully cognisant that such niceties or a logical deference to natural justice weren’t requite characteristics in the case of a black defendant. And consequently he also knew that he could say whatever unsubstantiated crap he wanted to and unchallenged get away with it, because the predominantly white racist society in Britain of which he and the rest of the judiciary are an integral part would buy it without demur.



The hypocrisy and arrogant double standards replete in the comments, attitudes and actions of those ostentatiously besides themselves with manufactured rage and expediently jumping up and down with demented ire on the self-serving bandwagon of the British soldier killed in Woolwich by Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale is absolutely mindboggling; and if one were to excuse the stark fact that some of those involved in these activities are blissfully ignorant of the darker side of British history, courtesy of a dumbed down educational system; and moreover that they’re themselves vacuous to the core as well as illiterate and innumerate and most happy to be spoon-fed by way of the dishonest and lying narrative dished out by the BBC and the private sector corporate media alike, which routinely and manipulatively use them for their own self-centred and financial vested interests, it still doesn’t alter the fact that overall the UK, its white Caucasian population and their kith and kin significantly dispersed across the globe as a result of an often brutal and enforced white European hegemony have considerably much more to apologize for than to complain about, especially in the raving and lunatic fashion that they characteristically go about the latter.



In that regard let’s take just one example of the myriads of those dreadful double standards to exemplify what I mean. The infamous case of Baha Mousa an Iraqi hotel receptionist who was humiliated, tortured and brutally murdered by the British Army in Basra in 2013. A most dastardly set of circumstances that were covered up by the British Army and the government in Westminster with only one person and evidently the selected fall guy in this case, one Cpl. Payne convicted of a preposterous minor assault charge even though ample and clear video footage showed what had actually taken place. An enquiry however was forced upon the UK government after persistent demands by Baha Mousa’s father, an Iraqi colonel, and others for one to be held. Headed by Judge William Gage the enquiry reported on the 8th September 2011; and its findings were that the British Army was directly responsible for Baha Mousa’s death along with those of several other Iraqi civilians as well as their systematic mistreatment prior to their calculated murders.



The British Defence Secretary at the time, Liam Fox then unconvincingly and hypocritically described what had been done to Baha Mousa as “deplorable, shocking and shameful” even though he knew the full facts about what had taken place all along, studiously said nothing about them at the time, didn’t see fit to institute criminal or court-martial proceedings against those who where responsible for these horrendous murders, totally unrelated to any combat activities it must be stressed, and were it not for the persistence of Baha Mousa’s father and others to have the truth made public, measures that were followed by the UK government’s enforced consent to an enquiry and afterwards that enquiry’s findings, Liam Fox would have continued to obdurately stay silent and complicit in the brutal murders including that of Baha Mousa; and the belated and mealy-mouthed words Liam Fox unconvincingly uttered in the aftermath of the enquiry’s findings basically to cover is incompetent, complicit and hubristic ass wouldn’t otherwise have been said.



Meanwhile we had David Cameron, just as unconvincing in his remarks for as PM he must have been told what had actually happened or at least one would have expected him to have asked provided he cared that is, saying it must never happen again, then quite incredibly went on to claim it’s not the way the British Army behaves. Oh really David! Well, here are a few historical incidents for you to mull over and that will quickly and incontrovertibly debunk your stupidity, ignorance or wilful disingenuousness on this matter: Kenya’s Mau Mau, the Indian Munity, the Boer War and Northern Ireland.



Check these and others out mate and you’ll soon be disabused of this infernal hubris that you and others like you who’ve never worn a British military uniform in earnest, donning one on for TV photo-ops doesn’t count, or haven’t the slightest intention of ever doing so but whose hubristic impudence and bogus patriotism nevertheless lead you to narcissistically jump into the vanguard of ostensibly defending Britain and what you think it should stand for in the 21st Century and doing so to the last drop of someone else’s blood never your own or that of your close relatives or friends. And what’s more overtly overcompensating for your own abject cowardice relative to matters that are clearly and genuinely in Britain’s best interests and are diametrically at odds to the ones that you embark on and which are evidently inimical to the well-being both of Britain and its population; this either from your own criminal propensity or perversely misguided perspectives; attitudes that cause you to feel compelled to defend the existing status quo, including the rogue members of the British Armed Forces charged with implementing the UK’s nefarious foreign policies.



Then we had Peter Wall, a British Army general, asininely stating, as if this could remotely be a vindication for these rogue soldiers odious conduct, that many of them involved in these dastardly activities theirs and that they routinely used weren’t born when these said activities were banned in 1972. So that makes their actions alright Peter? For starters prized assholes like yourself who’re now regrettably so Britain’s military top brass along with our political apparatchiks would be the first to say that ignorance of the law is no legal defence. Besides, how come Peter that so many British soldiers born after 1972 could so collectively involve themselves in criminal activities outlawed before their birth unless of course they were taught them? Bearbaiting, putting people in the stocks, drowning or burning supposed witches or forcing one’s enemy or traitors to walk the plank were activities that were outlawed before any of us in the UK were born but I don’t see anyone resurrecting these activities and using you lame, insulting and rather sick excuse Peter Wall relative to these British soldiers actions abroad to justify indulging in these proscribed activities. Murder is murder however you look at it Peter Wall, and furthermore manifestly odious when it’s callously and premeditatedly carried out; which is exactly what happened in the case of your soldiers!



Adding insult to injury we also had Mike Bracken, aka a Wing Commander in the RAF who admitted that he killed innocent civilians but resolutely refused to make any apologies for his doing so, and didn’t think that he needed to. In the interview he gave this sociopath spent a considerable portion of his time talking about the failure of a so-called smart bomb but most of his conversation centred on his fanciful comments pertaining, proclaimed this prized RAF prick, to Colonel Gaddafi wanting to massacre his own people; all of them innocent civilians went on this pathetically sick man very much in need of an urgent lobotomy and a complete disgrace to the RAF I once voluntarily served with. But even if his patent lie about Colonel Gaddafi had even a modicum of probability about it, why was it wrong for the leader of a sovereign and independent country to kill traitors to that country at home but perfectly okay for this insufferable British asshole Mike Bracken to openly and unapologetically boast about killing Libyan civilians, cowardly doing so from a military aircraft thousands of feet up in the sky and totally out of their reach, in their own country, not at war with Britain, and asininely claim to be doing so under the ludicrous pretext of humanitarian reasons. Sick or what?



What goes around, it’s an absolute certainty, eventually comes around. And I’m quite sure that British insurgents and others sent by the British authorities to create havoc and commit murder in Syria, Libya and elsewhere and who will eventually return home to the UK and the rest of Europe more radicalized than when they left, already know the private address(es) of Mike Bracken and his family members; and in the unlikely event that they don’t already have this information ought to be made aware of it, those opposed to this utterly objectionable, self confessed and boastful mass murder Mike Bracken will argue and in keeping with that view cheerfully oblige by providing them with it. And who can blame them considering what he said in that interview he gave and evidently stands for when it comes to the inalienable rights of people he clearly considers to be his inferiors, simply because they aren’t white Caucasian as he evidently prides himself on being.



It’s a sick and obsessive exceptionalism that’s pervasive throughout British, white Caucasian society and particularly so among Britain’s elites; and British judges pathetically out of touch with reality and the real world they don’t know anything of and care even less about, living in a bubble of elitist exclusivity fashioned by their own hands and that is fulsomely rendered an unwarranted and the most obsequious of obeisance to it by the overwhelming majority of the British public are some of the worst offenders. Yet forever quick to crack down on what they paranoically perceive as a presage towards contempt in what they narcissistically and hubristically regard as their courts, never the nation or the peoples’ courts mind you, and do their damnedest not to lose control of, even when there’s no actual or intrinsic threat to their inherent control-freakism; and the only issue at stake is their pretence at being civilized men or women. Likewise the CPS, all part of the same incestuously close-knit legal fraternity, that has no problems with facts, which if they don’t like them they simply change them. Just part of the irrational prejudices of class solidarity.



That’s why I firmly believe that these people who aren’t democratically elected to any office within the UK’s legal system that they hold and therefore can’t be removed by the electoral will of the nation’s voters and where nepotism and corruption, malfeasance in office, the lack of transparency and unaccountability are manifestly evident, subjective prosecutions, or none at all, are the order of the day particularly when the suspects in the latter case are friends of those in power or the self-confessed idol of an incumbent Prime Minister, where probity is at best variable and at its very worst a sham and cover-ups of wrongdoing aren’t only frequent in nature but also institutionalized and fine-tuned, that British judges, the CPS, politicians, the police and even those who run the BBC and corporate media should acquaint themselves with the fact that revenge is an insidious thing, since it eats away at you and takes over your life.



That statement with sanguine and logical reasons to substantiate her contention for doing so was firmly impressed upon me at the age of four years old and shortly after I had started my debut at the primary school I was enrolled at by my maternal grandmother throughout my life has be a tremendously influential and quite inspirational figure. This eloquent and instructive piece of advice from her which I’ve meticulously followed ever since came about when a lad much bigger than me then and in a higher class than I was, he was also much older than me, gratuitously picked on me. I told Gran about this and contemplated ways of dealing with this bullying lad and actually getting my own back when Gran intervened with her indisputably level-headed advice, which was never to harbour a grudge or worst still apply my mind with thoughts of revenge; since by doing so I would basically be allowing my adversary to dictate the terms of my own behaviour. I did as my Gran advised and as she always knew I would. Crucially I got the better of this bullying lad and quite decisively so too; but it wasn’t through any sleepless nights on my part revengefully agitating about how best to do so. For Gran’s advice had well and truly paid off!



Which all boils down to the simple realization that commonsense, a carefully worked out plan, strategy in other words; an unshakable determination, unwavering commitment, a firm resolve, undaunted courage and immaculate timing beats impetuosity and sheer brute force, based on the irrational concept that might regardless of how misguided it actually might be is always right, hands down every time; irrespective of however long that takes. The actions of Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale therefore clearly and unabashedly fall into the first of these two categories; those of the UK government, Britain’s elites, the judiciary, CPS, police, parliamentarians and significant numbers of white Caucasians very much, and clearly from an objective point of view, regretfully fall squarely into the second and latter category. It’s an outcome that stems from the positioning, whether freely or manipulatively embarked upon by those involved, which asininely assumes that by killing the messenger or at the very least shutting him or her up those acting this way will somehow be spared the uncomfortable home truths of what his or her message is all about.



A fish rots from the head and here in Britain we’ve got and, for some considerable now, have had governments that are rotten; a parliament that’s rotten; and a media that’s rotten. We also have a financial system that’s rotten, a class structure that’s rotten, a criminal justice system, military top brass and police forces that are extremely politicized, corrupt and institutionally rotten to the core like all the aforementioned. Is it any wonder then that some of this massive, endemic and palpably top level rottenness has cancerously spread downwards to contaminate and, even as I write, is effectively permeating other sections of British society as well? And to these people revenge is totally okay it seems when it’s white Caucasians that are practising it however unpardonable their actions are; not so apparently when other people out of sheer frustration or absolute desperation embrace the same practices either for their own protection or survival, while additionally seen and considered as completely infra dig when used against those very same whites who gratuitously target such people in the first place.



Tony Benn, one of Britain’s few conscionable politicians with his sort an even more dismal rarity in 2014, once said in a television interview that if Britain were ever subjected to the same kinds of mindless atrocities which it has consistently and unwarrantedly perpetrated against other countries particularly those in the Global South, and continuing with this analogy was also attacked, invaded and had its citizens, or subjects if they freely choose to be so categorised abominably mistreated, tortured, savagely murdered and then dismissively and contemptibly regarded as collateral damage and their bodies indifferently, disrespectfully and appallingly mutilated and randomly disposed of, as British governments, their military top brass, senior civil servants in the Ministry of Defence and the Foreign Office routinely and barbarically support, authorize or turn a blind eye to when it’s jackboot Britain that’s calling the shots, those Britons who by any means at their disposal however supposedly terroristic or unconventional these were that resisted such wanton, pervasive and savage attacks on the UK and its people, especially its white Caucasian population, would instinctively be regarded by their fellow Brits as gallant heroes and heroines and extravagantly praised as such.



The Woolwich murder isn’t in my opinion your average murder but a calculated political act, no different from what Britain premeditatedly and along with its allies routinely carry out in the Middle East, the Ukraine, Venezuela and elsewhere in Africa for example, and the dead British soldier was collateral damage. Hard for you to swallow because it’s one of your own? Then don’t use the same terminology when your armed forces gratuitously murder hundred of thousands and even millions of innocent non-whites: old men and women; mothers, their babies and other underage children; peasants tilling their fields; guests at wedding parties and other social functions totally unrelated to your asinine war on terror and randomly any male who looks to be over the age of 14 - the age of majority in Britain for Christ sake is 18 years - with the overwhelming majority of those slaughtered and dismissively not even counted unquestionably being civilians; killed exclusively in their own countries where Britain and its collaborators have no lawful or moral right to be.



Preoccupied with racial prejudices of their own, themselves encouraged and reinforced by a distinctly slanted and white Caucasian narrative emanating from the corporate media and its BBC catch-up, unbridled vilification from the police and CPS and the subjective remarks of Nigel Sweeney with his ingratiating bias towards the dead soldier’s relatives and supporters – beats me why he didn’t just hand over the entire trial to them or have them openly assist him as the court’s assessors - Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale were always going to be found guilty, the killing was never in doubt just the motives for it; and the unanimous 90 minutes durations of the jurors’ so-called deliberation confirmed their prejudices.



Nigel Sweeney’s remarks in his summing up prior to his sentencing Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale to a full life tariff and 45 years minimum imprisonment respectively and in which he pertinaciously rejected the two men’s legal submission that their actions were political and not criminal, showed that he and his minders were psychologically rattled vis-à-vis what Britain, as they all well know, is daily up to abroad; and the contention of Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale as to why they’d acted as they did clearly struck a raw nerve with Nigel Sweeney and as such Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale had to be remorselessly slapped down, which they were. That said British judges know a lot about the law but precious little about justice or probity for that matter.



And if they don’t like that remark; tough! Since in my opinion, and I’ve every right to my freedom of expression as they assertively state they have, you can’t logically libel someone or persons as regards besmirching something they never possessed in the first place and most certainly don’t have now!



When I triumphed over my first real adversary at the age of four and the subsequent bullying ones after that and always utilizing the sensible advice tendered to me by my Grandmother, with a warm, affectionate hug and a beaming smile she would always when we were entirely alone together remind me in her most supportive words that I was simply the best. Several years later as an adult when someone totally unrelated to what went on between my Gran and me penned a song by that name and it became a smash hit for Tina Turner Gran would laugh effusively and every time she heard it aired say to me that they were playing my signature tune. She even bought me that record as a present and which I treasure immensely not only because of what it signified for me as a child growing up under Gran’s remarkable influence but also because it was from her.



I can’t hug you or it wouldn’t be allowed Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale but my thoughts and best wishes even so will forever be with you; for in the words of my Gran to me I now say to you: “You’re simply the best!”