it states that dracula was born as the first vampire bound to the code of blood for life.......now why is it dracula can be killed if he was the perfect one???
There are only a few things trough out history that could not be killed in anyway . even the greek gods could be killed.
It is thought that Stoker chose the name Dracula upon finding it in an obscure history book. Previously the Count had been called Count Wampyr. Many historians link the name to a real life Romanian prince who was well known for being strict and cruel. The prince was Vlad III Dracula. Depending upon translation or perspective Vlad is synonymous with Dragon or Devil- the "a" was added to the end of the family name (Dracul) to indicate 'son of.' He was also known as Vlad Tepes (pronounced Tepesh) - Vlad the Impaler - named for his penchant for executing his enemies by impaling them on large wooden stakes. It is also reputed that he favored mass executions, enjoyed a banquet that was set up amid the dying and enjoyed torturing his victims. Although notorious for his sadism, he was respected by his subjects as he waged fierce wars against the Turks, tolerated no crime and erected several monasteries. Despite his authoritarian power he was overthrown twice, ruling only for three brief periods. He died violently in 1476, aged 45, and his body was buried on the monastic island of Snagov. His head, however, is said to have been taken to Constantinople as proof to the sultan of his death. Contrary to popular belief his castle does not exist in Transylvania. Although born in that area (now northern Romania) in 1431, he ruled the area of Wallachia (now Southern Romania).
Despite his atrocities the real life Dracula was not a vampire. In fact he is remembered as something of a national hero in Romania and was honored by the communist regime with a postage stamp. However, Hungarian Countess Elisabeth Bathroy certainly enjoyed blood and the cruelty attached to its attainment. By her own writing she claims to have had 650 victims, mostly peasant servants. She reportedly would bite large pieces of their flesh, torture them further, and bathe in their blood. Dracula
I dont know a whole lot about him, but i do know that his alias was Alucard. Which is Dracula spelled backwards
Again with this?
The name Dracula comes from Draco or Dracul, which was the way of interpretation by the romanian people of Vlad The Impaler's father who received the Order of The Dragon from the Hungarian King... And as in that time the word "Dragon" or "Drago" was unknown to the romanian language, it evolved or shifted into Draco or Dracul (the name for the Devil in Romania)...
Dracula actually meant "Son of Dracul"...
And yes, Vlad The Impaler was a hero and became a legend despite his atrocities...
Oh, he drank blood from time to time but he was not a vampire...
Tepesh was no vampire, if anything he was a hero to his people. He instilled fear into the heart of his enemies by the "atrocities". He was never defeated in war.
He would be the same as the Mayan's for the reason being, he consumed the blood as a reference to consuming his enemies power and strength.
Because Bram Stoker collected everything he could about vampires, something most people feared and tried to stay away from, so he had to work hard to get all his info. He created his story about dracula and named him from Vlad the Impaler, which others have already said.
Stoker manipulated Vlad into being a vampire through his book. Which is why the histories are so confused.
Dracula was born from the fertile imagination of Bram Stoker, an Irishman who never set foot in eastern Europe. It is speculated that Vlad was the model for the fictional character Dracula, but Stoker never documented this assumption. Prior to the novel, there was no Dracula.
In some fictional movie, the character of Alucard was introduced. Of course no one knew he was really Dracula, except for the audience.
The character of Dracula was made famous actually when an obscure eastern european actor named Bella Lugosi was cast as the vampire in the movie version of Stokers novel. The novel itself was obscure prior to the screenplay based on the novel. Stoker made little or no profit from its publication.
Thankyou for that post...Which is why Vlad is always confused for being a vampire...Even though they did finds animal bones in his grave, just means he was burried somewhere else for the purpose of grave desecration.
There is a thread that already exists for Vlad. Please feel free to post there.
~ billy