Dragonrouge and Vampire Rave
I am on Vampire Rave because it stimulates me to find out more about the myth and by that keeping it alive... but dead.
My activity here is intense and my priorities are:
- adding into the database
- administrating The Coven Of The Forbidden Fruits
- taking care of Transilvanian Dark Romanticism
- contributing to the Dragon Order
- posting in my journal
As you can see on the Transilvanian Dark Romaticism pages I am enthusiastic about the traditional image of the vampire.What is myth and fiction has to remain like that. Any exaggerate claim of a realism related to this matter is not on my list of priorities.
Vampire Rave friends
I have a lot of close friends on this site and I tend to respond to them as often as I could.
I don`t add on my friends list persons I don`t know well enough.That would mean that I should add hundreds of profiles and the utility of this Vampire Rave feature would be lost. I don`t add profiles on the friends list just to stimulate them to add me too, so I can increase my level.I have a comfortably high level and I don`t make a glory from this.
If you like to send me messages or just to see when I am online much easier please add me on your friends list. I don`t mind.
If I am online and I don`t respond immediately that means I am probably very busy and usually I am.
Please do not be offended and be patient.If you are a friend of mine I am interested in talking to you.
Because my intense activity on VR, I
Vampire Rave rating system
I don`t believe in fair ratings. Ratings are by their construction subjective and destined to have more fun on VR.
I usually look over the profile and watch the images. If they are on my tastes I read the information too.
I usually rate 10 or 9. There are enough people who use all the numbers on VR. Sometimes, if I don`t like a profile, I don`t rate it.
I like to re-rate profiles and visit them again.
COMMENTS
VR would not be the same without you, DR. You have been a dear friend of mine since the beginning and you will remain so. I appreciate your passion and your knowledge on the subject of the vampire. It does my heart good seeing you enjoy yourself so much. *squeezes*
Yeah - what she said!
*hugs you*
*blushes*
And I thought I am a red Dragon already!
Thank you ladies!
It`s a pleasure to be on VR with you!
"Soon after the 1819 publication of John Polidori's The Vampyre the vampire was brought to the stage in France There Polidori's dark tale caught the interest of a group of French romantics attracted to the story because they thought it had been written by Lord Byron Before the year was out, it had been translated and published in Paris as Le Vampire, nouvelle traduite de l'anglais de Lord Byron. However, for many of these early explorers of the subconscious, the vampire became a fitting symbol of the darker, nightmare side of the inner reality they were discovering. An expanded sequel to the story appeared early in 1820 as Lord Ruthwen ou les vampires, authored by Cyprien Bérard.
Bérard's colleague Charles Nodier was the first to adapt "The Vampyre" for the stage. He merely had to alter the ending of Polidori's story to assure his audience that the forces of good were still in control. In the end, these forces triumphed over the lead antihero, Lord Ruthven who in Nordier's version was killed. His three-act play, Le Vampire, mélodrame en trois actes, opened on June 13, 1820, at the Theatre de la Porte-Saint-Martin in Paris. It was an immediate and somewhat unexpected success and inspired several imitations. It was translated into English by J R Planché and opened in London as The Vampire; or, The Bride of the Isles. Later in the decade it would inspire a vampire opera, Der Vampyr, by German musician Heinrich August Marschner
Two days after Nodier's play premiered, a second vampire play, a farce also called Le Vampire, opened at the Vaudeville in Paris. This comedic version of Polidori's tale was set in Hungary and featured a young suitor mistakenly believed to be a vampire. A short time later, a second comedy, Les trois Vampires, ou le chair de la lune, opened at the Varieties. It centered on a young man who imagined that vampires were after him as a result of his reading vampire and ghost stories. In 1820, no less that four vampire plays, all comedies, opened in Paris under the titles Encore un Vampire; Les Etrennes d'un Vampire; Cadet Buteux, vampire; and Le Vampire, mélodrame en trois actes.
The vampire seemed to have run its course with Parisian audiences after a year or two, but in 1822 a new play, Polichinel Vampire premiered at the Circus Maurice. The following year a revival of Nodier's play again attracted a crowd at the Porte-Saint-Martin. Among those who attended was the young Alexandre Dumas, who was just beginning his literary career. He later would recall his traumatic evening at Nodier's play, where he was seated next to the author, by composing his own stage version of Le Vampire. The 1851 production of that play closed out the Parisian phase of Dumas's life.
Over the next few years, writers periodically would fall back on the vampire theme, which always attracted an audience hungry for the supernatural. In England, for example, records have survived of St. John Dorset's The Vampire: A Tragedy in Three Acts (1831); Dion Boucicault's The Vampire (1852) (generally revived under the title, The Phantom; George Blink's, The Vampire Bride; and Robert Reece's The Vampire (1872).
Theatre du Grand Guignol: At the end of the nineteenth-century a theatrical innovation in Paris had an immense effect upon the image of the vampire. Max Maurey opened the Theatre du Grand Guignol in 1899. The drama offered at the theater followed the old themes of dark romanticism but treated them in a fresh manner. It attracted numerous working-class people who seemed fascinated with the presentation of gruesome situations and ultrarealistic stage effects, however, horrorific. The theater developed its own vampire drama called, fittingly, Le Vampire.
Grand Guignol, slightly tempered by stricter censorship laws, opened in London in 1908. The English version emphasized the gothic element in its stage productions. Most importantly, Grand Guignol flourished in both England and France, producing original drama as well as utilizing established horror stories such as Dracula and Edgar Allan Poe's tales. Through the first half of the twentieth-century the theater influenced individual motion pictures; but after World War II it became important in the creation of the Hammer Films horror classics, beginning with The Curse of Frankenstein (1958) and the Horror of Dracula (1958).
Dracula Dramatized: The entire thrust of vampire drama had changed in 1897 with the publication of Dracula by Bram Stoker During the twentieth century, the overwhelming majority of new vampire plays and dramatic productions would be based on Dracula, and the character of Lord Ruthven, who dominated the stage in the nineteenth century, would all but disappear.
The dramatizing of Dracula was initiated immediately after the publication of the book, Stoker himself taking the lead with the intention of protecting his rights to his literary property. Using the cast of the Lyceum Theatre, where he worked, he presented Dracula; or The Undead as a five-act, 47-scene play. Ellen Terry, the cast's star, portrayed Mina Murray Even Stoker described the hastily prepared production, "Dreadful!" Its opening night was also its last performance.
The intricacies of the plot served as an obstacle to playwrights who might have wanted to bring the story to the stage. However, in the years after World War I, an old friend of the Stoker family, Hamilton Deane then the head of his own dramatic company, began to think seriously about a Dracula play. He asked a number of acquaintances to give it a try, but was always turned down. Finally, in 1923 during a period of illness, he accepted the challenge himself. Four weeks later, he had a finished script. He overcame the book's problem by deleting the opening and closing chapters in Transylvania and Whitby setting all the action in three scenes in London, and bringing Dracula on stage in London to interact with his archenemy Abraham Van Helsing
Deane, not at ease in London, and fearing the ridicule of the London critics, opened the play in rural Derby, England, in June 1924. It was a success, and the public's demands soon made it the company's most frequently performed play. Finally, on February 14, 1927, Deane opened his play in London. The public loved his work, and while most critics panned it, others gave it very high marks. It played at the Little Theatre on the West End and after several months moved to large facilities at the Prince of Wales Theatre. It ran for 391 performances. Deane then took it back to the countryside where it ran successfully through the 1930s. At one point he had three companies touring with the play.
Soon after Dracula opened in London, Horace Liveright purchased the American rights for the play from Florence Stoker, Bram Stoker's widow. To assist with the delicate negotiations, Liveright had engaged the services of John L Balderston an American playwright and journalist then living in London. Balderston continued in Liveright's employ to do extensive rewriting of Deane's play for the American audience. Balderston also streamlined the plot, eliminating several characters and significantly changing the ones who remained. Dr John Seward the youthful suitor of Lucy Westenra in the original story, became the central character in the revised plot as Lucy's father. Mina Murray, the leading woman in the novel, was eliminated and her role collapsed into that of Lucy, who also became the love object of Jonathan Harker
The Balderston version of Dracula opened on Broadway on October 5, 1927, following a brief tryout at the Shubert Theater in New Haven, Connecticut. Bela Lugosi assumed the title role. The play was an immediate success and played for 33 weeks and 241 performances. Liveright had hesitated in developing a touring company to take it around the country but, Deane (who retained a small financial stake in the American enterprise) threatened to write a play based on a vampire other than Dracula and bring it to the United States. Balderston convinced Liveright of the need to send a company on the road. Lugosi joined the West Coast cast that played Los Angeles and San Francisco. The success on the West Coast convinced Liveright to create a second company to tour the East and the Midwest.
The original Deane version of the play significantly affected the image of Dracula and the appearance of the vampire in general. Deane domesticated Stoker's Dracula by dressing him in formal evening wear and ridding him of his extreme halitosis. The formal opera cloak, the cape with the high collar, would be clearly identified with the vampire character. Balderston's rewrite of Deane's play, however, was the more influential dramatic version of the novel. It introduced Bela Lugosi, later typecast as Dracula, to the part. And it was Balderston's version that served as the basis of the 1931 Universal Pictures movie and the 1979 remake with Frank Langella Published by Samuel French, the Balderston play became the version to which producers turned when they decided to revive Dracula on the stage. The most notable revival, of course, was the 1977 stage version starring Langella, which inspired Universal's remake.
Dracula Clones, Variations, and Parodies: For a generation after the success of the Balderston play, dramatists did little with the vampire theme, although in England a satire of Deane's play appeared briefly in the 1930s and a musical version surfaced in the 1950s. While a few variations on the Dracula theme were written in the 1960s, generally whenever a vampire play was sought, the Balderston play was revived yet again. The situation did not change until 1970 when suddenly four new vampire plays were published: Bruce Ronald's Dracula, Baby; Leon Katz's Dracula: Sabbat; Sheldon Allman's I'm Sorry, the Bridge Is Out, You'll Have to Stay the Night; and a more obscure Johnny Appleseed and Dracula.
Since that time almost 50 vampire plays have been published. They vary from one-act plays for high school productions to more serious dramas designed for the Broadway stage. Only a few, such as The Passion of Dracula (1977), Dracula Tyrannus (1982), and Vampire Lesbians of Sodom (1984), have risen above the crowd to receive some national attention. The Passion of Dracula opened for a successful run at the Cherry Lane Theatre in New York City on September 30, 1977, just three weeks before the award-winning revival of the Balderston play with Frank Langella opened at the Martin Beck Theatre on October 20. It was a variant of the Dracula story with Christopher Bernau as Count Dracula and Michael Burg as his archenemy Abraham Van Helsing. On August 23, 1978, it began a successful run in London.
Ron Magid's Dracula Tyrannus: The Tragical History of Vlad the Impaler was the first play to use all of the newly available material on the historical Dracula, Vlad the Impaler the fifteenth-century Romanian ruler. It built on the ruler's rivalry for the throne with his cousin Dan. Vampire Lesbians of Sodom, whose three acts take the audience on a romp through history from ancient Sodom to Hollywood in the 1920s and modern Las Vegas, is based more upon the vamp the female seductress, than the classical vampire.
Among the lesser-known plays, made available in large part for amateur productions, were several written by Stephen Hotchner and Tim Kelly. In 1975, Hotchner wrote three one-act Dracula plays, Death at the Crossroads, Escape for Dracula's Castle, and The Possession of Lucy Wenstrom. These were adapted for use at high schools, colleges, and community festivals from a full-length Dracula play Hotchner published in 1978 that combined the three one-act plays. During the 1970s Kelly also produced a number of Dracula-based plays, including musical variations such as Seven Brides for Dracula (1973) and Young Dracula; or, the Singing Bat (1975). Hotchner and Kelly's publisher, Pioneer Drama Service in Denver, Colorado, specialized in plays for amateur productions. The Dramatic Publishing Company of Chicago also published a number of Dracula-based dramas, including the first I Was a Teen-Age Dracula by Gene Donovan (1968). These productions characteristically used a lighter treatment of the vampire/Dracula theme and were targeted to younger audiences or people attending less serious entertainment events.
Of the vampire plays written since 1965, the overwhelming majority have been variations on the Dracula story, or at the very least have used the word Dracula in the title. Carmilla comes in a distant second with three plays based on Sheridan Le Fanu 's story. During this period the number of vampire plays has steadily increased and, given the heightened interest in vampires at the beginning of the 1990s, there is every reason to believe that new plays will continue to be written.
Vampire Theater: The gothic movement that developed in the United States in the late 1970s has had a noticeable influence upon vampire drama. The movement itself was very dramatic, built as it was around bands who used theatrical effects as an integral part of their performances. Possibly the principal examples were those by choreographed by Vlad the Chicago rock musician who heads the band The Dark Theatre.
More recently, La Commedia del Sangria was created in 1992 by Tony Sokal as a dramatic company that performs "vampire theatre" and includes a strong element of audience interaction. The company's very metaphysical production, examines questions of the vampiric condition (limited immortality) and the existence of God. Some of the actors begin the performance portraying audience members and then enter the stage as an apparent interruption. The production has received a warm response from people in the vampire subculture who regularly attend to cheer on the vampires each time they bite someone.
Deane, Hamilton, and John L. Balderston. Dracula: The Vampire Play in Three Acts. New York: Samuel French, 1927. 113 pp.
Donovan, Gene. I Was a Teen-Age Dracula. Chicago: Dramatic Publishing Company, 1968. 90 pp.
Dracula (The Original 1931 Shooting Script). Atlantic City, NJ: Magic Image Filmbooks, 1990. Glut, Donald F. The Dracula Book. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press, 1975. 388 pp.
Hotchner, Stephen. Dracula. Denver, CO: Pioneer Drama Service, 1978. 55 pp.
Kelly, Tim. Young Dracula; or, The Singing Bat. Denver, CO: Pioneer Drama Service, 1975. 61 pp.
Leonard, William Tolbert. Theatre: Stage to Screen to Television. Vol. I. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press, 1981.
McCarty, John. Splatter Movies: Breaking the Last Taboo. Albany, NY: FantaCo Enterprises, Inc., 1981. 160 pp.
Skal, David J. Hollywood Gothic: The Tangled Web of Dracula from Novel to Stage to Screen. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1990. 242 pp.
Stuart, Roxana. Stage Blood: Vampires of the Nineteenth-century Stage. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green University Popular Press, 1994. 377 pp."
Source:
http://www.answers.com/topic/vampire-drama
COMMENTS
Very interesting :)
Another interesting educational entry - thank you!
(I'm also thinking that those scratches on the walls and fireplaces are from cats - lol)!
Thank you, ladies!
They might be.
;))
I hope the kids won`t notice.
These vampire cases were presented by William of Newbury(aka Newburgh) in his book "Historia Rerum Anglicarum" (written after 1198) and are considered the oldest vampire cases in England.
"It would not be easy to believe that the corpses of the dead should sally (I know not by what agency) from their graves, and should wander about to the terror or destruction of the living, and again return to the tomb, which of its own accord spontaneously opened to receive them, did not frequent examples, occurring in our own times, suffice to establish this fact, to the truth of which there is abundant testimony. It would be strange if such things should have happened formerly, since we can find no evidence of them in the works of ancient authors, whose vast labor it was to commit to writing every occurrence worthy of memory; for if they never neglected to register even events of moderate interest, how could they have suppressed a fact at once so amazing and horrible, supposing it to have happened in their day? Moreover, were I to write down all the instances of this kind which I have ascertained to have befallen in our times, the undertaking would be beyond measure laborious and troublesome; so I will fain add two more only (and these of recent occurrence) to those I have already narrated, and insert them in our history, as occasion offers, as a warning to posterity.
A few years ago the chaplain of a certain illustrious lady, casting off mortality, was consigned to the tomb in that noble monastery which is called Melrose. This man, having little respect for the sacred order to which he belonged, was excessively secular in his pursuits, and -- what especially blackens his reputation as a minister of the holy sacrament -- so addicted to the vanity of the chase as to be designated by many by the infamous title of "Hundeprest," or the dog-priest; and this occupation, during his lifetime, was either laughed at by men, or considered in a worldly view; but after his death -- as the event showed -- the guiltiness of it was brought to light: for, issuing from the grave at night-time, he was prevented by the meritorious resistance of its holy inmates from injuring or terrifying any one with in the monastery itself; whereupon he wandered beyond the walls, and hovered chiefly, with loud groans and horrible murmurs, round the bedchamber of his former mistress. She, after this had frequently occurred, becoming exceedingly terrified, revealed her fears or danger to one of the friars who visited her about the business of the monastery; demanding with tears that prayers more earnest than usual should be poured out to the Lord in her behalf as for one in agony. With whose anxiety the friar -- for she appeared deserving of the best endeavors, on the part of the holy convent of that place, by her frequent donations to it -- piously and justly sympathized, and promised a speedy remedy through the mercy of the Most High Provider for all.
Thereupon, returning to the monastery, he obtained the companionship of another friar, of equally determined spirit, and two powerful young men, with whom he intended with constant vigilance to keep guard over the cemetery where that miserable priest lay buried. These four, therefore, furnished with arms and animated with courage, passed the night in that place, safe in the assistance which each afforded to the other. Midnight had now passed by, and no monster appeared; upon which it came to pass that three of the party, leaving him only who had sought their company on the spot, departed into the nearest house, for the purpose, as they averred, of warming themselves, for the night was cold. As soon as this man was left alone in this place, the devil, imagining that he had found the right moment for breaking his courage, incontinently roused up his own chosen vessel, who appeared to have reposed longer than usual. Having beheld this from afar, he grew stiff with terror by reason of his being alone; but soon recovering his courage, and no place of refuge being at hand, he valiantly withstood the onset of the fiend, who came rushing upon him with a terrible noise, and he struck the axe which he wielded in his hand deep into his body. On receiving this wound, the monster groaned aloud, and turning his back, fled with a rapidity not at all interior to that with which he had advanced, while the admirable man urged his flying foe from behind, and compelled him to seek his own tomb again; which opening of its own accord, and receiving its guest from the advance of the pursuer, immediately appeared to close again with the same facility. In the meantime, they who, impatient of the coldness of the night, had retreated to the fire ran up, though somewhat too late, and, having heard what had happened, rendered needful assistance in digging up and removing from the midst of the tomb the accursed corpse at the earliest dawn. When they had divested it of the clay cast forth with it, they found the huge wound it had received, and a great quantity of gore which had flowed from it in the sepulchre; and so having carried it away beyond the walls of the monastery and burnt it, they scattered the ashes to the winds. These things I have explained in a simple narration, as I myself heard them recounted by religious men.
Another event, also, not unlike this, but more pernicious in its effects, happened at the castle which is called Anantis, as I have heard from an aged monk who lived in honor and authority in those parts, and who related this event as having occurred in his own presence. A certain man of evil conduct flying, through fear of his enemies or the law, out of the province of York, to the lord of the before-named castle, took up his abode there, and having cast upon a service befitting his humor, labored hard to increase rather than correct his own evil propensities. He married a wife, to his own ruin indeed, as it afterwards appeared; for, hearing certain rumors respecting her, he was vexed with the spirit of Jealousy. Anxious to ascertain the truth of these reports, he pretended to be going on a journey from which he would not return for some days; but coming back in the evening, he was privily introduced into his bedroom by a maid-servant, who was in the secret, and lay hidden on a beam overhanging, his wife's chamber, that he might prove with his own eyes if anything were done to the dishonor of his marriage-bed. Thereupon beholding his wife in the act of fornication with a young man of the neighborhood, and in his indignation forgetful of his purpose, he fell, and was dashed heavily to the ground, near where they were lying.
The adulterer himself leaped up and escaped; but the wife, cunningly dissembling the fact, busied herself in gently raising her fallen husband from the earth. As soon as he had partially recovered, he upbraided her with her adultery, and threatened punishment; but she answering, "Explain yourself, my lord," said she; "you are speaking unbecomingly which must be imputed not to you, but to the sickness with which you are troubled." Being much shaken by the fall, and his whole body stupefied, he was attacked with a disease, insomuch that the man whom I have mentioned as having related these facts to me visiting him in the pious discharge of his duties, admonished him to make confession of his sins, and receive the Christian Eucharist in proper form: but as he was occupied in thinking about what had happened to him, and what his wife had said, put off the wholesome advice until the morrow -- that morrow which in this world he was fated never to behold! -- for the next night, destitute of Christian grace, and a prey to his well-earned misfortunes, he shared the deep slumber of death. A Christian burial, indeed, he received, though unworthy of it; but it did not much benefit him: for issuing, by the handiwork of Satan, from his grave at night-time, and pursued by a pack of dogs with horrible barkings, he wandered through the courts and around the houses while all men made fast their doors, and did not dare to go abroad on any errand whatever from the beginning of the night until the sunrise, for fear of meeting and being beaten black and blue by this vagrant monster. But those precautions were of no avail ; for the atmosphere, poisoned by the vagaries of this foul carcass, filled every house with disease and death by its pestiferous breath.
Already did the town, which but a short time ago was populous, appear almost deserted; while those of its inhabitants who had escaped destruction migrated to other parts of the country, lest they too should die. The man from whose mouth I heard these things, sorrowing over this desolation of his parish, applied himself to summon a meeting of wise and religious men on that sacred day which is called Palm Sunday, in order that they might impart healthful counsel in so great a dilemma, and refresh the spirits of the miserable remnant of the people with consolation, however imperfect. Having delivered a discourse to the inhabitants, after the solemn ceremonies of the holy day had been properly performed, he invited his clerical guests, together with the other persons of honor who were present, to his table. While they were thus banqueting, two young men (brothers), who had lost their father by this plague, mutually encouraging one another, said, "This monster has already destroyed our father, and will speedily destroy us also, unless we take steps to prevent it. Let us, therefore, do some bold action which will at once ensure our own safety and revenge our father's death. There is no one to hinder us; for in the priest's house a feast is in progress, and the whole town is as silent as if deserted. Let us dig up this baneful pest, and burn it with fire."
Thereupon snatching up a spade of but indifferent sharpness of edge, and hastening to the cemetery, they began to dig; and whilst they were thinking that they would have to dig to a greater depth, they suddenly, before much of the earth had been removed, laid bare the corpse, swollen to an enormous corpulence, with its countenance beyond measure turgid and suffused with blood; while the napkin in which it had been wrapped appeared nearly torn to pieces. The young men, however, spurred on by wrath, feared not, and inflicted a wound upon the senseless carcass, out of which incontinently flowed such a stream of blood, that it might have been taken for a leech filled with the blood of many persons. Then, dragging it beyond the village, they speedily constructed a funeral pile; and upon one of them saying that the pestilential body would not burn unless its heart were torn out, the other laid open its side by repeated blows of the blunted spade, and, thrusting in his hand, dragged out the accursed heart. This being torn piecemeal, and the body now consigned to the flames, it was announced to the guests what was going on, who, running thither, enabled themselves to testify henceforth to the circumstances. When that infernal hell-hound had thus been destroyed, the pestilence which was rife among the people ceased, as if the air, which had been corrupted by the contagious motions of the dreadful corpse, were already purified by the fire which had consumed it. These facts having been thus expounded, let us return to the regular thread of history."
The entire book can be found translated into English from Latin here:
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/basis/williamofnewburgh-one.html
Recently I found an article about one of the oldest(if not the oldest) vampire case documented!
I added the article here and in the database.
COMMENTS
-