this is interesting
i am venturing to post a collage and edited version of some posts made a while back on another topic regarding the validity of sanguinarism, it appears that this thread may be a valid field also for the text therein
all things that may appear out of context i am sure will be most gracefully overlooked
here it is
vampire is perhaps a stage in evolution and not a thing per se
it is the movement of the organism from matter to energy
the intake of more subtle forms of nutrition and stopping of the intake of matter has already begun
it is the germ of this movement in matter
there are already beings , demons, spirits and so on that feel on energy and more subtle forms of matter
they though are disembodied and so need the use of human beings from time to time
the human body is the pinnaclke of evolution bearing the seed to a thing that is beyong divinity beyond the ethereal even
a new matter
vampire is a stage
about time it is about death
time is death
speed of evolution is about experiencinfg that death at high speed
pain is about death and time
it can happen now
in fact it always happens now
there is also the matter of the validity of the "fictional vampire " within the reality structure , it must be plausible for it to manifest, assuming ofcourse that manifestation is a reality and natural process
imagination is just that , imagination, it is also a reality in its own right a creation and universe, but it is governed by the god that created it, in this case many many minds and wills, the conglomeration of generations and passing the parcell that has created this fiction
perhaps the validity and extent of validity of modern diagnostic methodology is what here is really the thing that is brought into question here
for instance the basis of distinction between matter and spirit being one of faith or belief as opposed to experience, that matter is the realm of existence that is tangible , can be felt ,held, is subject to scientific enquiry , that can be dirctly percieved and experienced by the senses, and spirit is that realm of reality that must be only believed in, some sentiment and feeling invested with suppositional value, needing to be affirmed from time to time
what if matter is but a denser form of the ethereal
what if in it is clothed the ethereal
we may go even so far as to suggest that reality is an oscillation between matter and energy or spirit or what is known as the wave nature of reality
the old dillemma of "is light matter or wave"
for reality is really about light or sound , anyway you like to look at it
perhaps this oscillation is what enables both material and spirit to exist together and seperately at the same time
perception is then about a resonance with the frequency of oscillation, the closer one one vibrates to the frequency of reality, the closesr is ones perception to the actual natuire of reality
the issue of the doctor is finally resolved as diagnosis and experimental techniques
which further reduces to a test condition and the sample, or patient, or phenomenon
all this assumes that the test conditions are not subject to change
the margin of error determining the accuracy of the results as always
what if like we suggested earlier blood is both its physical compnents, RBCs WBCs Platelets and so on, as well as red essence, as well as the memory of its living and vitality, as well as the medium by which live manifests itself in the body
what if all these realities exist , together , seperated by a half cycle of an oscillation
matter wave,matterwave and so on
what if there is a near simultaenaety of existence
as in when one tunes into the radio, how all the stations are always there, yet one listens to the one that one has tuned into the one that ones resonated most sympathetically to, one reality manifests, inspite of the simultaenous existence of many
what if perception decides reality
after all what is reality
we are told it is eventually protons and neutrons and so on, we are told it is also trees and biology and gravity
this thread is very interesting in that it in its own way questions the extent to which diagnostics and the observation to theory process which is its base is valid
perhaps blood is the exact shade of red, that some photochemical reaction requires, maybe it is just about that
perhaps haemoglobin is the exact substance that a metabolic process is lacking
theories and theories
it is the same on both sides of the thing
it is all after all only theories
science is after all a theory, a supposition and construction
the supposition is the point at which its reality fractures, till then it yeilds quantifiable explanation
perhaps all of it is only about a race to whose supposition is more real lol
whose imagination is less imaginary
proof, what is the basis of proof, we rarely ask this question
we rarely question the validity of proof itself
it is always assumed as if by magic or conjuring that proof the concept of proof is beyond question
we have perhaps made a papacy of proof
the concept of inner ,outer and skin here perhaps is the point
horizon and edge
the edge that presumably seperates
what if this edge itself is the construct
that this seperation is the things that seperates so to speak
there is an interesting question that is raised here, one of evolution, and the crucial points, where the thing did go down
for instance the first fish that began to breathe air,
that came out of the water's edge, that till then was the universe to it, the real, and science, and provable, beyond which lay the unknown air, that suffocated
did this fish perhaps not have to die on that unknown shore as fish , did not perhaps this fish have to relinquish gills and become lungs, to transform, to metamorphose,
who saw this fish i wonder recorded this moment, was it not such a beautifully lonely moment ,truly and in every way
this is not science fiction that this example is from bythe way, but the implication of genetic evolution theory, one that usually supposes a gently transition from tree to land to two limbs to tools and so on, that does not raise shocking situations, unbelievable and magical almost situations like this one
for the first fish to have evolved lungs something very much like this needs to have transpired, as it was
it could have been only about one fish, not some gentle process over many thousands of years
this covers the matter of transformation and the fact that genetic theory is based on it, whether one looks at it this way or not, it is the natural implication thereof
the matter you raised, of fangs and so on right about now seems very plausible compared to this transformation of the very organ system of an organism, the very restructuring of an entire anatomy, and physiochemical system
not even a reprogramming but another thing altogether
i have purposely veered away from the matter of mind and matter, will and afirmation
of will and affecting change,
that route becomes about a dialectic, which is just more yeses and nos
more opinions and more things to be proved, more papacies
that matter is also not so much about discussion than experience and experimentation
hallucination if willed and backed strongly enough perhaps becomes pseudoreality also, as in how the memory of an event or person, their reality statement in the present can be doctored
and that is just a conjuring, a sleight of hand and trick of time
real proof is perhaps about experience, that proof is more a continuum than an event
yes that is the thing perhaps whre the error occurs in assuming proof as a thing out of the time matrix, the continuity
perhaps the body is the ultimate field of all phenomenon, the only field even maybe
the laborotory scientist and experiment itself
yantra ,tantra and mantra , perhaps all reside in the body, to borrow sanskrit terminology
we have so far spoken about these things only in very objective terms, in this language, that keeps the element of opinion and undefined terms and concepts out
also everything is natural
since nature is the field where all processes occur , for something to be unnatural it would necesarity have to exist outside of this feild
the left handed path is exactly about accepting all that is natural
darkness, danger ,fear, natural disasters, death and pain,
that is why the terrifying deities
they are meant to scare the denial out of the aspirant
but all this is tangential
it is already about prana
consumption of blood is still a less evolved form
subtlety makes for greater freedom and access to the depths of the human body, and its true potential
as the I begins to identify with less gross elements finer sublte elements, its reality and the rules that govern that reality too become subtle
the supernatural abilities and so on
are actually just a clearer view of nature
it is all nature,
layers and layers of reality
the layer one identifies, one is bound to
when one identifies overly with material one is subject to the laws of material or the earth element like density, grouinding, securitty, congealing, gravity, inertia and so on
it is the things base the I on that determine the nature of how that I manifests
what if reality is actually unlimited and limitation is the skin , by whose means manifestation may occur
that without limitation nothing would exist
it is however important to understand this matter from a non polar or moralistic or sociological point of view, from any point of view whose cbasis is a construct, however good and usefull that construct may be
this is a matter of reality
also the matter of both understanding and environment are products of thought and mind
we are speaking of the self, the I the master of mind, the thing for which mind is a tool a means to function
the key word being identification as opposed to thought
thought is but memory a replaying of perception, sensation and impression
identification is about being the thing that is identified with
all doubt and crisis of the human condition is about a dilemma in identification
immunity is about identification
when every cell is bathed by the blanket of the I
when every cell knows that it belongs to I
and then that I identifies with what it determines to be reality , from there the mind, cells and so on derive their realities
not the other way around
there are many methords, one is to determine what is not I in this mess that we find ourselves
this is usually preliminary amd amounts o letting go and releasing patterns that no longer serve the purpose of the I
health is perhaps about a consistency in the I
and a harmonious relationship between the I and nature
and nature is a form of truth
yes these paradigms are constructs
structures and machines which serve a specific purpose for a period of time
like first grade books in first grade like university books in unioversity like research material whilst one is doing a phd
they are not reality , but tool to arrive at reality
they are things in time
depending on what one is requiring at the time within the greater scheme of ones overall agenda
the agenda of agendas being liberation freedom, truth, bliss, hapiness , contentment etc
also identification is an action, an afirmitive, process, not so much reflexive or reactionary
if it were it would merely be a replaying of another thing
like when we say that we have identities
we are here speaking about an actual inquiry into the nature of this I
this I whose awareness is falsely assumed every time we begin to speak
also perhaps a clearer understanding of this I may further lead to insights into you, and we, and they
maybe this is what the cord compassion means
that when one understands ones I one automatically understands, to that extent the I that manifests as the other
perhaps when one allows freedom to oneself to be, that freedom begins to extend to the other
the matter of the other is brought in here to elucidate the concept of evironment
the apparent source of pain and pleasure
there are two processes then that we have spoken of
one aims at being more aware of the present identifications of this I, the many things that I think, feel, believe that I am,
and the other to create an I through a conscious process of selective identification
both ofcourse are mutually inclusive and are informed by the other
also all concepts we have discussed, individuality, identity , environment, crisis etc can be perhaps more simply understood in these terms
this also ofcourse at some point is a machine and construct as it is based in language, grammar and the illusion of space time causation and continuity
it is though a useful machine at this time and may be used to fulfil a purpose
like all machine when one reads more meaning into it than there is , one faces conflict from its unreal aspects
that brings us to the point of clarity of intent, purpose and ones own schema
that one has developed oneself for specific purpose
perhaps a continous awareness in real time of ones intent , is the thing that may take away confusion with regards to our dilemmas as to whay am I here, doing this and so on
when one takes full responsibility for ones condition and movement , the other then is instantly nullified
all then is brought back to self
again and again it comes back to self till it is perfected
till as the buddhists say ,the form is perfected
one is then free from the limitations of projection; blaming, envy, jealousy, greed etc
one can then use them to ones advantage
one is then in a real sense free ,or moving in that general direction, if there is such a thing as direction that is
