I scanned through the responses rather quickly and perhaps I missed it but did anyone think it odd that he clipped leads to his ear lobes? That's what he was applying some kind of cream or gel to and he spent quite a bit of time doing it. So it would seem that this is either part of the whole "trick" and I do think it's a trick, or it's to divert attention away from something else he's doing.
In fact, it would be interesting to look at the container that ointment was in and see if it has a label. I'd not be at all surprised to find out that it's very much like the cream they use on EKG electrodes to enhance conductivity between the skin and the electrode. And if he's doing this through "eyebeams", why is he worried about electrical conductivity between a pair of leads and his ear lobes?
So let's think about what the electrodes on an EKG actually do. They pick up slight electrical signals in the skin which are initiated by contractions of the heart. So it's a way to read muscle activity through the skin. When I ride my bike I wear a heart rate monitor that works on exactly the same principle. There is a strap worn around the chest and it holds a plastic piece with contacts just under the pectoral muscles. It tends to work a bit better once a bit of perspiration has built up as this enhances the electrical contact between the skin and the device.
So it stands to reason that what he's actually doing is picking up some kind of electrical signal in his ear lobes which is generated through muscle contractions. The leads from the goggles are plugged into the same lead with the two from his earlobes which connects with the computer. So perhaps all he's doing is tightening a muscle near the mastoid process or in the upper neck which is covered by his hair.
If not then it makes sense to try to think this out from the point of his claims. He's claiming the eyes emit some sort of energy ray. Okay. So if we remember that humans are a product of evolution, how is it that we've maintained this ability across untold hundreds of thousands of years without ever realizing the ability was there or that it could provide any kind of survival advantage? What he's claiming would basically suggest that all of the confirmed evidence for evolution is incorrect.
Let's take it a step farther. The eye isn't a great mystery. We have a pretty good idea how they work. A human eye is roughly a spheroid. It has a hole in the front called a "pupil", an iris which acts much like the aperture in a camera, a lens (transparent muscle), for focusing at various distances, a focal plane coated with receptor cells (retina), and a "cord" called the optic nerve to transmit the signals generated by photons striking the receptor cells, to the visual cortex of the brain where they're interpreted.
Notice what's missing? There's nothing in the eye which shows any mechanism for generating any kind of energy beam whatsoever.
So we have the claim that a beam is being generated without any mechanism with which to generate a beam, a proclaimed ability which defies the laws of evolution, and two leads clamped to the ear-lobes which could, all on their own, explain exactly what is actually happening. And yet he made no mention that I heard about the leads on his earlobes. If you can monitor someone's pulse with a lead clamped on the end of a finger (as is customary for people admitted to hospitals), then there is little reason to believe one can't generate a weak electrical signal which can be picked up in the ear lobes.
I'm calling this one an obvious and rather pathetic fraud.
"Eyebeams"?
Wow!
