Good or Evil?
I feel this is a very debatable topic, and does have answers to it.
Good and evil, as I see it, both must have always existed since the beginning of time. They balance each other out.
But then again, it all depends on how you define the terms. If you believe that 'good' refers to 'innocence', perhaps mankind started off as good. But if you define evil as not resisting certain urges or instinct, we may have entered this world as an evil race.
So I stand with my belief that both existed at the same time.
When the world was just created..just made..do you think it could have really had any evil in it?
When the Earth was just created, people didn't exist then...
I'm talking about the beginning of time.
I believe that good preceded evil.
From a religious standpoint I am a Christian and I do believe that the creation of the universe was an intentional act and was, at the beginning good.
Even Christian believers debate whether "The Devil" is the purveyor of all evil, or if it rests in mankind.
If you remove faith and God from the equation, I still say that good came before evil. If you theorize that mankind evolved from other creatures...Where is "evil" evidenced in nature outside of the influence of man? Nature, in and of itself, is "good" or at worse neutral. Not until mankind comes into the picture is there any evidence of "evil" acts or intentions.
So either way, biblical creation or evolutionary development Evil does not have any influence on Earth until mankind shows up and Good precedes Evil.
Well at the beginning of the earth there was no one to be "good" or no one to be "evil". So good and evil never did exist till Adam and Eve were created and ate of the tree that was forbidden.
If you take a new born baby... would that not be innocent? Its only as they grow up that evil comes into play. I know that does not answer your question, but want to put my two cents in.
:)
well who would know then? can you find information dated so long ago or facts?
without one you would not have the other. Neither comes first.
Devina:
If you look at nature outside the influence of man, where do you see the evidence of Evil?
Either biblically or through the gradual development of nature with NO influence of a devine being, how does evil manifest itself, other than through the actions of humans?
KCRC -
I must disagree with you. People are not evil. People didn't invent nor have evil because they want it, in my opinion...
I think "Evil" is an energy, and therefor, as all other energies, should have been made when the Earth (or the universe) for that matter was created.
Good on the other hand, in my opinion, is NOT an energy. It is something that has to be done manually.
What is my logic on my opinion? It's rather simple actually. People can do evil easily..out of instinct..but good is a lot harder to do. Manual work is always harder than automatic work.
So I think Evil came first.
I respect your opinion.
But I still do not see any "Evil" influence on the Earth outside of the acts of mankind.
We simply do everything to survive, reproduce, and enjoy ourselves. All animals do the same things. Just because we have a bigger brain, more power..so on and so on, doesn't mean only mankind is evil. Anything living has evil in it, just in smaller portions...and they do less damage.
Going with KCRC on this.
Good first, evil .....came with mankind.
Yes it is easy to do evil, but from my perspective, it is JUST AS EASY to do good if you chose to do so.
Babies are born innocent, we teach them evil as they grow. We can just as easily teach them goodness.
KCRC,
From where I stand in my thoughts I would have to say that even in the natural occurance of things that evil was here to because if the sun shown down upon the land without water then the grass would die, and crops would not grow. So would there not be an underlying evil within the sun, and all the other forces of nature as well?
Because evil destroys things, and things have always been destroyed since time began..
Well, if your definition of evil is the absence of any given good thing, I can see your point.
I see good as inherant. The way nature works uninfluenced by outside forces...The natural balane...is good.
Evil I see as intentional. Not in the natural ebb and flow following the laws of physics and nature. If something falls from a tree and dies; there is no evil in it. If a lion kills and impala to eat and feed it's young; there is no evil in it. If you accidentally cut someone off in traffic and as a result they put a bullet in your head and kill you...They manifested evil.
I can see your point KCRC.
But now take "the 7 sins". Not only humans can do those, right? Animals have some (if not all) of them too. Are they not evil? Have they not been around since the dawn of time?
what are the 7 sins? can you list them so we who dont know; like myself what they are please?
Evil in essence of the word is man made...something can't be "Evil" unless humans say it is."Evil" as you say is not fuild or living entity.it is a concept that was invented to explain something or someone with bad intentions or "evil" thoughts or emotions.When the world came to be...not by the hand of an all powerful "God" There was no evil...as far as we know.If you go by many cultures..."Evil" came into the world from a dark dimension...trying to keep the light or "good" from taking over.
and Vampirika before you tear into my post or try to bash what I say...Im giving my opinion on the subject...not looking for confrontation.
Vampirika
I feel that you are right on this as well.. I agree that they do have some if not all of the same 7 deadly sins we do, and therefore are evil as well, but they also carry good within them too..
The natural good that comes from a mother protecting her young cubs. You know things of this nature..
DarkWolf -
I believe nothing is anything until humans "say it is". Because the bottom line is we catagorized and defined everything as we know it today. Including all that is "good".
Devina -
I think the ultimate question is what is more in this world...good or evil. Then we can guess what the world ultimately is..more good or evil..and that's probably how it was started and meant to be.
Good and Evil go together like Yin and Yang.....they are equal parts of everything and you cannot have one with out the other.....
One may be stronger at times than the other but, again they are always still together.....
So my opinion is that they came together as one and will always be.....
Neither good nor evil came first.
Man came first and we invented evil, making good come into play.
A newborn is called an innocent cause they have no sense of good or evil, right or wrong. They are taught this by the ones around them. Very easily they can be twisted into thinking evil is good, and vise versa.
Think about this, if I don't help a stranger is that evil? If I don't rob that man is that good?
Both are actions we have to decide upon. We have to look within ourselves for the answer. For we all posses both good and evil.
In summary, which came first good or evil?
Both, the moment man came into existance.
The answer depends on what the first choice was. Was is a creative one or a destructive one.
Good and evil is not black and white. Good and evil might not even exist at all. It’s all just perception. I think if there is a defined good and evil they would have started at the same time. A primordial piece of slime might have done something that it thought was good while another piece of primordial slime that was watching might have thought “damn that was evil”. Neither came first.
Man did NOT exist in the beginning of time, therefor do not bring humans into example with this please. At the beginning of time there was nothing but Earth. Wind..air...maybe some grass. NO people..
Nature is neither good nor evil. A tree cannot decide to fall onto a man, a tiger cannot decide whether to kill that deer or not. A tree either falls or not, a tiger is either hungry or not.
In all of the universe, nothing is either good nor evil. It's a decision we make and our actions following that decision decide whether it is good or evil.
Good and evil is not an energy or destruction or creation, it's action carried out by a being with the compasity to understand the difference between the two.
It All Depens From Which Side You Look At It If You At Itt From The Catholic Point Of View Then Good Was First And Evil After
I believe that they both coexisted from the beginning. Not which one came first. They balance each other out.
Neither can exist without the other. What is good without evil? What is right without wrong? The logical answer is that both had to come into existence at the same time. However, in the beginning there may or may not have just been ‘one’. Existing ‘as is‘ until it was deemed ‘good‘ or ‘evil‘ by us.
We may never know the true answer.
Also, when asking this type of question, you have to take an individual’s person believes into consideration... So, again, we may never know.
That's what makes a good discussion. Many good and valid opinions. =)
Keep them coming guys. Maybe someone can define good and evil? I cannot.
Good and Evil are words. They have no meaning, no concreteness or reality other than that ascribed to them by humans.
In the beginning of time, before the existence of humans, there was no good nor evil, as WE think of it. There were no words, no meanings, no free will.
According to the bible ( as long as I remember correctly ) Lucifer was an Angel , then he got banished to hell , so I'd say Good was here first .
if we are saying there are no people , are there animals? if so niether would exist it would just be nature runing its course.
Well evil may have come first then good came to balance it out.
|
Vampirewitch39 Royal Sire (204) Posts: 1,069 Honor: 20,541 [ Give / Take ] |
This post:
"Man did NOT exist in the beginning of time, therefor do not bring humans into example with this please. At the beginning of time there was nothing but Earth. Wind..air...maybe some grass. NO people.."
So are you asking if the earth, wind, air and grass is evil or good? :)
On earth long ago, a hunter throws a spear and hits the prey and there is dinner......good
The next time the hunter goes out he misses with the spear, and goes hungry...evil
i think good came first.. and adam and eve fucked it up and betrayed god with that damn apple..
I believe that the God(dess)s created all things as good. It is mankinds own corruption OF ITSELF that created any and all evil in the world. No I dont believe "The Devil made em do it."
I feel that both were created at the same time. The whole "equal and opposite reaction" thing and all, to bring a more physical sense to it.
I believe both existed in perfect harmony -and they are still trying to consistnaly balance.
Good and evil are relative to each other so were created at the same time, for one without the other is an impossibility in the universe, IMO. With only 'good' you would not know what evil was and the opposite is true as well. Something is evil by its comparison to good, IMO.
To offer up a viewpoint besides Christianity....
Greek mythology states that in the beginning there was Chaos. Chaos existed before anything else. From Chaos arose Nyx (the night) and Erebus (the darkness). From the union of Nyx and Erebus, comes Ether (light), Nemesis (vengeance), Eris (dispute) and also death, gossip and fraud.
Basing my opinion on this, I would say that evil came first.
I say when man was created and was given free will of thinking.
|
TheFireWithin Premiere Sire (124) Posts: 2,110 Honor: 36 [ Give / Take ] |
You can't have one without the other... I like to think that good and evil were once one in the same and then split into what they are now....
I am sure the world was made out of both, since everything is a duality, and needs another part of that duality to be seen.
Honestly... I'm more of the thought that evil came first, though narrowly ahead of good. Why?
So, given humans have been given cognitive thought, I assume their first thoughts were based on a need to survive. At that point, there was no need for the concept of 'good' or 'evil' - just survival.
As the early humans lived, some survived and some died as per a way of life. Let's say things are changing in the way of weather patterns, and food is becoming less and less available. Human A has the inclination to steal food from Human B. Though this inclination is based on survival, it doesn't change that Human A could just as easily spend time searching for food than premeditate on stealing food from Human B. That makes Human A's inclination to steal a 'bad' thought, which is akin to the start of evil. Human B could then counter Human A's inclinations by voluntary offering help, which is a 'good' act, and akin to the start of 'goodness'.
Of course, this is all a gross generalization, and good could have easily come before evil... but this is just the way I think of it.
I believe in the garden of eden -- so I say both at the same time -- Adam and Lilith ..
Good and Evil ..
both were here at the same time.when man and woman first walked the earth we all possessed the nature of good and evil.every mortal body is wracked with both knowledge of good and bad.those who loose all hope losse all the good in there hearts.once one looses all hope they turn towards a life of evil.
i think that as soon as the man had consciousness of his freedom, both were born at the same time... one existing to compensate the other...
I agree w/Darkangel not everyone believes in "god" 7days so on.
BloodMother -
Like I've said before, nothing "meant" anything before people gave it a "meaning". Does that mean that the ocean really wasn't the ocean when it was just formed? Does that mean the wind was something else before people came about and named it? All of nature was all the same without us, and so was good and evil.
Vampirewitch39 -
Yes, I am asking exactly that. Was this planet, with all of it's energies and nature, originally meant to be good or evil?
I am literally pulling my hair out to answer this question.It's really food for the thought.
I would say neither or both.
Does evil and good exist in nature or it's only in humans' point of view?
Many would say good and evil don't exist in human nature,and nature itself,because moralism doesn't affect human nature.
However we are born innocent but even selfish,so does that make us evil?Because we are taught that selfishness is evil, or that little bit of selfishness is needed for survival, therefore that bit of selfishness is good? Or it's simply neutral?
But then there are religious theories that would disagree with this,but who really is right?
Heh I'm still pulling my hair out.
I too would say they both came into existence at the same time after all how do you define evil from good and visa versa with the other being present??
There is no good without evil and no evil without good. Plus of course it's basic human nature.
isnt it the same thing? just a diferent point of view...
i believe there was good on the mind tell that apple was eaten and then came choice on which one
It was originally "meant" to be good, I believe. And as stated before...it was our own corruption of ourselves(from free will and actions) that lead there to be evil in the world today as we know it.
i think they both existed at the same time. without one coming before the other. with out good, there is no evil. without evil, there is no good. plus, the good/evil scale is all in black and white terms. life has some color. even the least evil people have to have ulterior motives. there is good in evil and evil in good.
I have to agree with Wiccanpothead42024.
I think that the presence of human kind brought about the "evidence" of evil and therefore good.
After all... do we not each decide on our own what is good and what is evil?
If a child is taught that murder is good the child will murder. and if a child is taught that life is scared then the child will honor life and abhor murder.
Therefore is it not possible that they both existed at the exact same time for all eternity?
Also isn't is possible they sort of formed around eachother. everything began as true neutral. but then someone became jealous of what another had and killed him for it. the one who was killed was an innocent victim, and therefore good. the other, acting on jealousy and rage, was deamed evil.
Tora -
The only problem with your logic is that CHILDREN were NOT around at the beginning of "eternity", or so we think...
Am I not understanding something here or are people really that challenged? I will say this once more, then I will assume either I'm retarded or people do NOT read/understand this Thread at all.
**People did NOT exist in the start of time, therefor can NOT be included as an example here. MAKES NO SENSE!** -.-
I'm not sure which came first, if they even did at all...but I do know that one cannot exist without the other. That is the balance of things.
Good and Evil are symbiotic, neither exists without the other. Not to mention that ones perception of the two may differ from another view. So neither came first. Mans capacity to do both are equally high.
I believe neither came first, more of there is no true good or evil, there is only the false pretenses of an evil vs. good. trully to be good must be evil and evil must be good...which to choose from, when they are set in the same general thought
In all things, it is how we perceive them to be. In the bible, until Adam and Eve ate of the tree of knowledge, they did not understand "good or evil". "Good or evil" is only a perception of how we view a specific action to be, it is unique to the individual person. Good or evil does not exist until we choose to label a specific person, place or thing, "good or evil". As such, all things are both.
Good and Evil do not exist. They are simply terms of ethics and morals that individuals assign as per their own opinions.
True, what people would call good or evil is completely individual, but is also dependant of the society in general, and the time one lives in.
Both as th concept of good and evil come from the same source people.
Evil is to destroy.
Good is to create.
There is your purpose, solitude, and the absolute existance of good and evil.
With that being said, what is the World meant to do? Destroy or create? It cannot be both.
Absolutely wrong.
Then I say, to destroy is to create; A forest fire can be quite healthy for the flora, and brings back healthy new life.
Creating a weapon, a gun, a missile. This is good?
Your reasoning is without logic.
you cant have one without the other therefore i would say that none of them came first
A forest fire is natural, not bad.
A wolf killing a deer, also natural, not bad.
A human killing a deer? A human killing a deer for food? For trophy? For fun?
Where evil is placed in these examples is individual.
I see a lot of people bringing up that if an animal kills aother animal, it's "natural" and therefor good..but if a person kills an animal..it's bad and un-natural.
Why is that so? Do we not need food to survive, just like all other living things? Just because we are on the top of the food-chain, doesn't make us evil. It doesn't make us anymore evil than any other living creature, to be more correct..
I believe in the balance of the good and evil. All came out from this balance and both, good and evil are manifested through a lot of things. The percentage of one or another in some thing gives the identity of that thing. Thus we have to reach again that balance, the primordial harmony, the primal "Adamic" state, unbalanced.
I am by no means on expert on Theology and I really only know the Chrsitian version well enough to comment. The Apocrypha (books left out of the bible, Latin 450bc) talks about this some. The story is not "secret" to modern times.
So according the the old testament G_d basically determined what was "evil". Lucifer was an Arch Angel and wasn't buying in to the whole "worship me" thing. It's a really interesting text.
Based on this I'll say GOOD.
My personal belief is different, but we'll save that for another topic.
In some mythologies, the Romanian one, for example, God creates the world being helped by the Devil. Anyways this is a Gnostic concept it its origin.
if you look at this in a biblical form then it would be nather in gen. 1 it said the god (good) looked in to the dark (Evil) and made light. a place for good to dweal
the same on that could be said of looking into the dark(void empty of all nothing there)
and created a place for light to dwell
or vice versa. I truly believe good/evil is a concept created by human beings.
simply to control the youth.Without this concept then imagine were every one would be if the words good/evil were not formed ?
I believe they were used to control people to do the bidding and thus far has worked marvelously
I dont believe that killing something for food is a bad or unnatural thing. However, and argument could be made that killing for fun is quite evil. Then again, haven't you ever seen a cat kill a mouse and play with it and then not eat it? Just something to think about.
Anyway, back to the main topic. I believe that good and evil both came at the same time and are both necessary. There is just as much to be learned from an evil act as their is from a good one. The feelings associated with these different act are very different however. Its a matter of morals in my opinion.
I don't believe that either exist. The idea of evil and good are simply labels that human beings came up with to explain/punish/control their society and it's actions. Going even farther..humans cannot even come to agreement on what is good and what is evil. It's all based on individual perception of right and wrong. Good and evil were created together by humans to describe human action.
I might think it's evil for someone to lie...someone else may think that it is good to lie in the right circumstance. Which is correct?
It's all relative and completely based on personal perspective...good and evil...just a scale of measurement created by man.
I change my answer.
EVIL. Evil is as Evil does.
*winks at RazaelRiezen*
I'm not sure good exists, perhaps good is just when evil is resting.
LMAO. Great thread here, seriously.
So far a few has seen my thinking on this with in themselves.
what truly is evil or good?
it is what people perceive it to be. Thus what ever the law of the land or country you live in that is what is good or evil.
Live in a land where cannibalism is legal then it is not evil but something allowed and accepted.
Where as live somewhere were eating meats is illegal any eating a cheese burger would be thrown in jail for consumption of something not allowed thus being evil.
I think that good and evil came to be at the same time. You just can not have one with out the other.
They can not exsist without the other, just like when you trun a light on it makes a shadow.
its hard to say on this one,im guessing they both had to be here at the same time,cause there is no good with no evil in it too :)
Usually everything starts with a mutation... so a bird-lizard creature lays and egg from which hatches a freak of nature... hence the first chicken... it then lays eggs and voila, the first of the chickens stage a coup. This is where they probably got the term Chicken Coup! ROFL Just teasing.
It really depends on what "how things started" that you want to look at . biblical or eveolution .
To go with the biblical theory . To me it seems like they were totaly with out good or evil . The concept wasn't introduced untill the serpent came in and introduced evil .
actually for speaking in a Christian raised life style. In biblical sense evil would not have been introduced until eve and adam ate of the forbidden fruit then evil was known. in that sense.
However I stand by my thoughts that good and evil did not arrive until people decided to create words to bring forth fear and terror to control their people.