To me, this looks nothing like a raccoon. Here is a picture I took of a raccoon 2 feet from my camera lens on my porch. And then, you can compare the two.



From FOX news:
The "Montauk Monster" may just be a bag of bones by now, but the people who know where it is aren't saying.
The riddle of the beaked beast found on a upscale East Hampton, N.Y., beach in mid-July got even trickier Thursday as various experts weighed in — and its "discoverers" revealed they might have something mysterious of their own planned.
First, "Animal Planet" wildlife expert Jeff Corwin appeared on FOX News Channel to proclaim that we're all suckers.
"What you think is a beak is actually the canine teeth," Corwin told Bill Hemmer and Megyn Kelly. "What we have is an incredibly rare" — dramatic pause — "raccoon."
New York magazine contacted the East Hampton Department of Environmental Analysis, which denied the town's animal-control unit had disposed of the beast.
"It's a raccoon," Margaret Carry-Smyth told the magazine.
Later in the day, the three women who said they'd come across the purplish flotsam a few weeks ago showed off a second snapshot of it on a digital camera.
"It exists," Rachel Goldberg, Courtney Fruin and Jenna Hewitt asserted on local cable channel Plum TV, denying suspicions that they'd Photoshopped a picture of a dead dog.
But pressed by interviewer Nick Leighton about where the animal was now, the semi-glamorous trio suddenly got cagey.
"It decomposed in our friend's back yard," said Goldberg. "It's been since removed ... by friends of ours."
"You're a little shady with the details," observed Leighton. "You planning to write a book about this?"
Goldberg only shrugged and nodded with a faint smile.
"We're hoping to have scientists contact us to find out what it is," she conceded. "It's in a box."
To complicate matters, Alanna Nevitski, who e-mailed the original photo that started the whole brouhaha, told New York magazine the three women were "full of" what dogs and raccoons produce a lot of, and that they had nothing to do with the picture.
The trio's elusive friend apparently popped up on one of FOX News Channel's rivals, where reporter Jeanne Moos played a video she'd gotten from a young surfer-dude type who said the carnivorous corpse was in his back yard.
"We're gonna try to have some experts analyze it," Davis said as his buddies used a stick to hold up what looked like bones with skin still attached. "It's a really cool beast."
Meanwhile, the marketing team for a new energy drink called Venom threw up a blog offering a lifetime supply of their product for anyone who captured a live Montauk Monster.
Finally, a third, better picture of the bloated body showed up on New York Newsday, whose site appeared to have crashed from all the excitement.
It's clear from this angle that the dead animal is, or was, quite male. It's also clear from an examination of the half-rotted head that it looks awfully like that of a — drum roll — dead raccoon.

Raccoon? Hmmm....
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,396182,00.html
Here is another page with it on there and an article. Who knows what it is. Dog? Raccoon? The thing that looks different to me, though, is the jaw. Montauk thing has a rounded jaw and face, whereas the raccoon has a pointed face and nose. I dunno. I am not an expert, so....
i have no idea what it is but i think being in the water for sometime might have really messed with its appearance. It probably is just a dog that fell over board on a boat or something simple. I would like to see a autopsy done so we do know what it actually is.
looks like either a raccoon or a dog or possibly a pig or hog.
I was thinking a boar also. Still would like to know offically though.
It doesnt' look like a racoon that is for sure.. Hard to say what it is.. Would be nice to see someone examine the remains.
It looks like a pig to me. I would say for sure its not a racoon
I too would like to see more of this i dont beleive it looks like a raccon either, and with the fact that any hair was lost by being in the water, but a racoon no way
A striking resemblence to a racoon yet the mouth is very undecided yet. looks odd. but many species are yet to be descovered on mother earth. maybe one of those. need to look into this more.
Somewhere in the world wide web, it was posted that the "Montauk Monster" could be a Nutria...but I doubt it since it is not native to the area at all.
http://www.nutria.com/site.php
Don't forget, Plum Island is near there, the USDA research area (I think that's the official title). Just think...We recently moved from near there to Texas. Hehehe, at least all we have here is the Chupacabra. LMAO.
there is no way thats a racoon not even close, thats an insult to the racoon itself
it looks like man bear pig haha (southpark)
or some kind of boar
Wow, that most definately does NOT look like a racoon to me. Maybe two different species of animals got together and did the funky tango to make that thing......it will be interesting to see what the scientists come up with after they have a good go at it.
To me it looks sort of like a raccoon that has been dead for a while...but then again the face is to rounded to be a raccoon. Maybe it's some sort of pig and it's just hard to tell what it is because it has started to decompose.
I dont see a racoon, but could be a dog without the fur. Or like mentioned before a pig
You would think someone would take it in and let us all know what it is. Instead of keeping it in a box behind there house. can you say morons? oops did i say that.
The nose is not a beak of a bird. It is the bone structure of the nose, more of an extended nose. A snout like nose.
The teeth are too forward to be the structure of a boar.
The animal had to be covered with fur as the flesh is still there. The flesh that was on the nose disappears faster than the flesh of a hairy animal. Had it been a hairless animal we would be staring at bones.
It is too big to be a raccoon. More the size of a boar.
What animals are hairy, have a bone rather cartilage for a nose and have only the two fangs on the bottom?
The other thing it could possibly is a science experiment. This does not explain why it is out of the lab.
I've seen several racoons in my life, dead and decomposed ones too. That doesn't look like a racoon to me at all.
None knows how long it was in the water. Bloating could cause disaray in the body. Fish were most likely nibbling on it. Who knows the Goverment experiences everyday. They keep secrets only those when we discover things try and find answers to.
Okay that looks like a cross between a pig, raccoon and a smurf (do to the blue skin, but that may be decomposition of the animal. Maybe it escaped from a military test structure who knows. Sorry Corwin, your a douche there is no way in hell that is a raccoon.
If it is indeed real it could be a creature that survived since pre-historic era. Not unheard of. I mean there are fish that are still around from then.
Sadly, this appears to be the bloated corpse of a canine and nothing more.
It has to be some animal either in some sort of decomposition or its been doctored a bit. Reminds me of the monkey hoax where some folks passed off a shaved monkey as an alien.
Monkey Hoax = http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/Hoaxipedia/Great_Monkey_Hoax/
I definitely don't see any resemblance to a raccoon. It could be a wild boar though. I see many similarities there.
Yea, I didn't see raccoon either. Different bone structure it seemed to me.
I did see a bit of boar in it but someone said they didn't think it could be that either. Pfft, I dunno.....
I looked more into this and there seems to be a hoax involved in my opion, the bones or animal is somewhere they said they thru it out and than said they had it in a box for scientist to study. looking for some money or other means to this huh. I think it is a racoon the more i look at it.
That is definitely NOT a raccoon. It does resemble a boar or a wild hog of some kind.
I would like to know what it is, also, when they figure it out.
definately not a coon , boar?? maybe but the nasal area just doesnt fit this either id like to see some close ups for sure
racoon is no where near that thing. And i am 100% positive its a mutation from some kind of animal if we could find more of them we could find out what mutation it is cause i am sure it had to have breeded with something and is around underwater cause if you look at its skin you can see it was under water. I only wonder what mutated it and what is was befor then cause it has features from a few animals.
it honestly looks like a dead tapir I cant remember if they have a beak like mouth or not if not then it looks like someone hyper fixed a beak onto it
Yep, I have to go with the Wild Bore theory here. Perhaps even just somewhat deformed.
It looks like a oppossum with mange and the nose is just skull now.. but dang that is a bad picture. let me have a look it up and then get back to you..
lol i like that one a opossum with mange is a creative answer.
it´s a chimera escaped from a secret government stem cell manipulation facility
That was a Tapir picture as someone mentioned the Tapir in their post and a youtube video of the montawk monster to compare.
I just saw on the 7 o'clock news that the monster is nothing but a prop being used by local film producers in the movie Splinter.
lol i think if it was real it was a Tapir or made out of the image of one.
It's not like any living thing I've seen or know of. It's certainly not a racoon, though.
Just out of curiosity, for those on board with the boar, how did said boar wash up on a beach in Montauk? I know potbelly pigs are pets, I just never got the memo about boars...
yes i think it is a Tapir also, wonder if a Tapir and a boar come from the same family or does it come from the aardbark family.
I do not think it looks like a racoon. I saw a comparson on tv and it looks like a turtle without a shell. Kinda creepy actually.
If "The Montauk Monster " is for real and not a stuffed animal used for a movie prop I am leaning twards a mangie animal parhaps a dog or coyote...All so a mangie racoon is possable since a bug in the lice family causes it and it can spread from dogys to kittys I am sure it can spead to racoons...
I thought that this interview on Fox with Jeff Corwin, who is a reputable wildlife expert, gave a decent and feasible explanation into the possible identity of this creature.
Animal Expert Jeff Corwin Talks Montauk, Green Monsters
I saw Jeff's take on it too on the news, where he said it was a raccoon. A raccoon? Hmm, I dunno about that.
I am not sure what some of those others are. I forgot, will have to look back at the thread. That turtle out of the shell sounded interesting. I haven't looked this up since I posted it, so need to do some rechecking. Anyone hear if they found an ACTUAL source yet?
Now when was the last time some movie company left their prop on a beach somewhere?
Tapirs (pronounced /ˈteɪpɚ/, as in "taper", as "ta-pier") are large browsing mammals, roughly pig-like in shape, with short, prehensile snouts. They inhabit jungle and forest regions of South America, Central America, and Southeast Asia. All four species of tapir are classified as endangered or vulnerable. Their closest relatives are the other odd-toed ungulates, including horses and rhinoceroses.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tapir
Honestly to me I don't think it's an animal at all. In the first picture it's legs and torso look very human and so does the arm position in the second picture.
Don't care what Fox says me thinks it's just a guy in some make-up. Bones can actually be faked and/or manipulated in such a way as to make them hard to identify or seem "un-natural."
What gets me is that a simular thing happend in texas and they claimed it was the chupacabra.Monsterquest was called in to investagate and they did an extencieve reasearch inclulding D.N.A. fome some of the tissue samples sent in from the head of one of the creatures.
Came back as a possable dog but they didn't find mange but the type of cainine was inconclusive..And that it was related to the creature spotted and photographed in rio...Soooo maybe to solve this whole problem they should get D.N.A. testing ?
If only it was as simple as that. It seems, gathering D.N.A. (if it has not already been done) will be impossible, unless the body is found.......
"The latest, according to the East Hampton Star: The monster has been stolen from the backyard of Eric Olsen, a Montauk real estate agent who said he had taken the corpse from Ditch Plains Beach, where it was "discovered" July 12."
Reference and more reading:
Was Montauk Monster a film hoax?
ohhh the plot thinkens to the unsolved mystrie of this..
well then parhaps it was stolen because it was for real?
or if it wasn't then the truth would come out..
*Cues Xfiles theme song*
I have to agree with CrimsonScarab. I just watched the episode of Monster Quest he referred to and believe DNA testing would be a grand idea.
Since the nose is rounded - it really doesn't look like a raccoon to me. I would also rule out pig - since it does not have hoofs, but clawed feet.
I would agree with crimsonshrub also as i believe DNA testing is the only way we will ever know.
I work as a firefighter in SF and we routinely do recoveries in the bay here. It's pretty amazing what time in the water does to a corpse.
People don't even look human after a few days.
The soft flesh and cartilage around the nose and mouth goes pretty quickly. Not to mention crabs and seabirds would have started eating the rotted flesh away.
Compare the teeth and exposed upper and lower jaws with this skull.

Binturong? I dunno. That looks more like the raccoon theory. And how does it end up on our Eastern shore in reasonably good shape? ;)
"Its natural habitat is in trees of forest canopy in rainforest of Bangladesh, Bhutan, Burma, China, India, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Nepal, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam.[1]"
deffenitly not a raccoon, maybe a boar or even an ant eater
Howcome everyone keeps saying boar when boar heads look nothing like the head on that thing? Boar are shaped like so....
![]()
Firstly let me point out that that creature is nothing short of f*cking disgusting. It doesn't, in my opinion, resemble a raccoon either. I couldn't say what it is but looking at those pictures is making me feel ill, lol.
It sure doesnt look like a raccoon but a small pig possibly? could be
The head of that thing looks like a turtle. I just can't make out any other animal in that...thing.
I keep looking to see if there's a possibility that the thing is something that was 'put together' but I just can't tell.
This artical just showed up on my local news net cast
It is not about The Montauk Monster but about a
Chupacabra that was caught on tape by local police in texas i provied this link http://www.myfoxla.com/myfox/pages/Home/Detail?contentId=7191547&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=1.1.1
at the bottom is the police video
to me it looks like
The Montauk Monster
could this be a simular animal?
Dash cam view of the living animal i got off the site

The size looks too big for coon. My guess is boar as well although in the top picture something about the feet look almost human i know that sounds stupid.
Maybe it is one of those mutant mixtures of two different species.
Jamie did you capture the coon for me to have for a pet? :P
I didn't capture the raccoon, but it comes around every once in awhile. =) It was reallllllllllly close to me. I put my hands out there with the camera to take the pics. hahaha....I was just glad it didn't lunge at me. It was curious though.
From what i have read in the past they are very curious animals it would be nice to see one that close up.
I guess they are better off in the wild but would be nice to have a pet of one too i think sometimes.
I don't got enough pets. :)
From the video and the images of the dead bodies...it looks like an inbred coyote or mixed breed of wild dog.
That thing gives me the creeps >.>;;
Things like that always do!
Well it appears rather unnatural to me because of the disproportionate head, let alone the beak (Yes, I'm rather certain that it is a beak - no set of canines looks like that!).
Gahhh, its creepy!
Not a beak...the soft tissue on its face is missing...the lips...nose and skin around them...all you see is the bone.
So you think that it's bone?
Wouldn't that mean it would have a serious overbite??
It does seem to have a beak. I have stared at the picture for a good while now and it isn't the same bone structure you would see in a boar or a racoon.
Also, doesn't it seem odd that all these supposedly mythical animals are coming into light now?
How do you mean, MOTC?
What's so special about "now" compared to any other time?
I thought it was a beak myself, but I guess there will always be debate over that.
From somone that raised both raccoons and pigs, I can tell you, it is neither of those. For those thinking it is a pig of some sort, check out the feet. Definately deosn't have the foot of a swine.
It's mother was wild & bred with something. mix up thing.
But love the raccoon pics.
Well, that second picture clearly shows a beak, at least to me, with airholes even. Maybe it's a mutated animal, but the beak/nose in that second picture doesn't look like any quadruped I've ever seen.
sweetie, i have no idea what it is but damn!!! that thing is ugly as long as its not out front my house its fine..... ewwww some sort of mutant
omg that thing is disgusting!!! Gyphon chicken maybe??? I have no idea but it's gross!!!
There is only two things that I am sure of about that thing... It definately isn't a raccoon and it's freakin disgusting.
Maybe a dog and pig cross breed?? whatever it is it's still DISGUSTING!!!!!!!!
its an adalestent bore the lower tusk are just comeing in
and there quite tastey might i add
I decided to check and see if there were any legitimate updates. To my surprise *coughs* there is now a website up dedicated to the Montauk Monster and more about a possible upcoming movie.
Montauk-Monster
Was the Montauk Monster Viral Marketing For Splinterheads Movie?
If what is said is true, it's a shame to see what routes people take for the sake of a movie promotion. It's like the Boy Who Cried Wolf.......
With the divisive behavior of these people using ploys like this, for sake of getting attention and making money, the day will come when something real does come along, and, tired of being played, we might just miss out.
Thanks, psyvamp, and here is a video that was on that site.
I am going to have to agree with morbidcuriousity on this one saying that it resembles a turtle without the shell...sea turtles can get pretty big as well as snapping turtles but I don't think you find snapping turtles around the ocean.
Who knows what it is and quite possibly someone just playing tricks to get a kick out of the chaos they are causing due to it.
between being dead for some time and being in water the corpse swelled. but if you look at a racoon skull there's definate similarities between the "Mauntauk" and a racoon.
This morning was another story on the alleged monster.
Is strange carcass another ‘Montauk Monster’?
LINK
That makes sense, Revenous. With two now washed up, they're soon to be on the endangered species list.
Save the Chupacabra!!!
It would be kool to have a vampiric dog-like creature.. ugly as well but has the right to survive as a specie, until we find out is an alien lol.
Whatever kind of creature it is .It is part of mother nature and should be respected .It does look like a mutation of doglike creature.
I will call him or her ~ lunariel the hound of the shadows mwanaha back me up NAO
They were probably mates. The last living chupacabras. There's a tragic love story there somewhere.
i think they are assuming it is bio- altered from the plant close by. was sent to scientist to see if it can be determined on what it was and if such a thing did happen.
It would take many generations and many altered genes to produce a bird/canine cross, which is what the first cadaver looked like. Now, if someone were experimenting to speed the process along, that might make it go faster.
What is the plant nearby involved in?
hehe this is great
i love people's reactions and speculations on what it could be
as i saw stated above, decomposing bodies look a lot different than the original
i reserve judgment, i'm no animal expert and the photographs aren't exactly taken in a way that i'd be able to identify it
Jeff Corwin thinks it's a raccoon or dog that has decomposed a little and Darren Naish agrees with the racoon theory...
since i've not had the.. privilege.. to be up close in personal with many deceased and decaying animals, i am more apt to go along with the assessment of people better qualified than i.
Darren Naish's blog has some interesting points:
http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2008/08/the_montauk_monster.php
he also has an entry about the newer animal carcass as well
http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2009/05/montauk_monster_take_2_sigh.php