Dan and I went to see this movie opening day. It was the 440 showing and almost sold out..I have never see so many ppl at an afternoon showing. I love the book, liked the movie. I love the way ron howard conveys the point of "so what IF jesus did have a child" does that make him less miraculous? i love that point. What do the rest of you think?
I read the books ( I do not think this is in the right section )
I want to see the movie and I am on monday =D
hey I loved the movie and the book... i think it was great... btw have you heard about all the ppl trying to protest against the movie...
I have not seen the movie yet, but absolutely loved the book. I am waiting anxiously to see the movie. I love Tom Hanks! lol
Does the movie go into depth of explanation as the book did?
I have read and seen that many people are protesting the book/movie. It is so ridiculous!! Dan Brown said in an interview (probably more than one, I only saw one) where the book is fiction, just a story. I guess some people have nothing better to do than protest something! lol
I've heard of the protests and I find it ridiculous personally. It's a book, If they do not like it, then they should ignore it. If it is really all that bad why would you wish to think on it even more by thinking out a protest?
I haven't read the book but I have heard from people that it was very good and I had them tell me a little about it so I had the basic concept of the book. XxImmaticulusWingsxX and myself are going to see it on monday. Can't wait!
I have read the book, and I would like to see the movie. I'm not sure with Tom Hanks being in the lead role as Robert Langdon though.
It's sad to me that the church's and individuals are protesting against this movie. Everyone has their own beliefs, their own rights.
i love the way blood is the basis of the movis such a familiar theme.....
--XxImmaticulusWingsxX--
this *IS* in the right place... general discussion.... its all about the blood isnt it?
I saw it in the sandbox already so I wasn't sure. Sorry.
thought the best part of both book/movie was the hide'n place.
no matter wich way your beliefs go on this topic, the finnal tease will torment many. so close yet so fare. hehehe
cheers
i've read the book, and haven't seen the movie.
there's a lot of hype over the movie, and that means that i'll wait to see it for fear that the hype will be disapointingly over rated.
the book was really good, but i don't know if i would believe in it just becaues it's written down. i've never seen any proof of what it says in the book.
Never read the book, had somewhat of an interst in the movie. Not sure really, if I'll bother with either in the end.
I saw the davinci code on friday and i loved it. It really makes you question the things you believe and leaves you thinking. I really want to read the book now.
I have way to much to say on this subject to post it here, the movie and book was correct in MANY things, wrong in some, and left a LOT OUT.
Check this link out "Jesus lived in India
There is a lot more to this than most can imagine. Anyone want to chat about it, message me.
Never read the book, but cant wait to see the movie. I will do so soon as i can, i just love tom hanks in all his movies. As far as the story, i will probably just watch it for its entertainment value because i have my own set of beliefs and if jesus was married good for him. :)
i believe a big part of the protest (whichs started long before the move) has to to with the "fact" section at the beginning of the book.
as someone raised by two very devout catholics (my father is the director of the catechetical institute for the archdiocese of a major city in the US) i can see why the in particular the hierarchy of the catholic church is so riled over the movie. there are many people, especially youth impressionable enough to be convinced by this, since enough of it is based on fact. if nothing else it is more than enough to sway the beliefs of many.
i grant it is fiction, but there are those who cannot quite seperate fiction from reality. however i really dont think people should get so personally insulted by heresy, or the mocking of their religion as a whole. while it is fanatics who start holy wars, it is people like this who carry them on.
all in all i found both to be very entertaing, and incredibly well executed. but i went to pick my kids up after and strongly recommended they did not see it. ;)
i havent read the davinci code, but im a bit skeptic about how all of this can make sense. im not religious or anything but i know this movie will outrage, as the book has already done, heaps of people,
and in saying so hope tom hanks doesnt score it in the middle.
if jesus was married, wouldnt he have sinned then?? this type of thing just brings alot of wtf thoughts to mind for me, so just ignore it...
i think if jesus had a family it would make him more of a man.
after all jesus was only a man.
we are all the sons and daughters of God.
i dont think marriage (or normal copulation during marriage) is usually considered a sin
The movie is very faithful to the book. But it helps a great deal to have read the book first as the film is very dialouge heavy.
I realize that Mr. Brown has said it is a work of fiction - certainly his "story" is. But there are historical events surrounding this book that are very much fact.
As Teabing says in the movie "The Bible wasn't sent down from heaven by facsimile."
Read the Gnostic gospels and study the true history of Constantine's "conversion". That speaks volumes in and of itself.
PhoenixMornelithe makes a good point. I think it would only add to the miricle of him being sinless and being married, he would of had more to worry about.
It's still a coming soon in Mlata,most prolly I'll watch it,however in Italy I've heard very negative critics,most prolly cause of the religion,but anyway I don't get much influenced by others opinions even though I am aware that am not going to be very impressed considering I arrely get impressed.
It speaks volumes to me that Brown's book has already sold over 40 million copies and that the film is breaking worldwide sales records; it says to me that people are searching; looking and questioning. Very much like Imagesinwords stated her church is encouraging. For the Christians here, how can any inquisitive gesture be wrong? "If you seek the truth...seek and ye shall find" right? For any others a fascinating and rich "expansion" to Western history.
But make no mistake, Brown's novel IS fiction. It overdramatizes points in the same way ANY good Tom Clancy novel does...Brown himself acknowledges it and makes no apologies. A good example here is the portrayal of the Opus Dei; in the novel you might think they are a cult of secret assassins; actual reality tells a MUCH different story; Numieries make up about only 30% of the groups population and for the most part they are only conservative, devout Catholics. In fact, the founder of the lay movement was sainted. There are numerous other examples that Brown lays out that simply are not supported by history OR science, such as the Merovingian line having no DNA characteristics in common with middle eastern descent, etc. Brown's book is fiction...most importantly, the author himself can't say that enoough these days.
The response of both Brown's book and the movie illustrate to me just how hungry people are for proof of "faith"; an oxymoron, of course, but the question of the ages.
Very good post.
Also if others decide to believe the movie/book,who cares?
If you are loyal to your belifs what others think shouldn't influence you.
I see all of the fuss created in Italy and most prolly is going to happen in Malta as well,as exagerated and unecessary.
It won't stop anyone from watching it.
I do think 'Jebus' had a wife and maybe a kid. No where in the bible did it say 'Jebus' was a virgin and back in those days it was probley weird if you didn't have a wife at 'Jebus's' age.
Scarlett, love, I have seen it, it's FLUFFY. I'm sticking with the BOOK!
And don't you guys argue in where to put this, (Ms) Scarlett's been here long believe me!
I haven`t seen it yet but wow the controversy about it is building up....My hubby is best friends with a pastor , and he told us all about it ... When you turn on the boob tube there is different`t commercials about it ..There like come to talk to us about it please ...There was a interview with Tom hanks , and he said well if we are getting all this controversy about it then we did our job... I`m going to see the movie when i can so curious.....What are my views i still believe in what i have always believed...
It would make his existence more real, more believeable if he were a real man than some supreme being.
I want to see the movie and read the book. This has me very fascinated.
I have not read the book nor seem the movie. i have heard they are both good and am waiting to see the movie.
The protest are ridiculous they need to find a better hobby. It is just a movie, get over your selves and let everyone just enjoy it.
i read the book and found as always there is a lil diffrence in the way the movie was made but i really liked ron howards spin on the subject it was a very good movie
I really want to see the film, I think I'm going to see it on Tuesday :D In the UK the film has been SLATED by the critics!!! They complained that there was a great cast but there was hardly any characterisation in the script. I think critics are full of crap anyway, I'll form my own opinion when I see it. I CAN'T WAIT!!! LOL
i really want to see the movie because it looks fab, plus i watched "friday night with jonathon ross" and the munk in the divnci code (damn ive forgot his name) was on the show and they showed parts of the film and it looks kool.
Haven't seen the movie yet but loved the book. Ron Howard is a great director. But what I don't get is why all the fuss? This is a fictional work so why is the Church so up in arms about it? Isn't the church darwing more attention to the movie by the protest and comments they are making than if they had just let it go? I always tell the young ones to look beneath the surface as there is always more to the picture, to not accept everything that is told to them as the "gospel". to always question if the answer doesn't seem right.
Its a grand adventure in speculation.
Fun to entertain.not original however
Nikos Kazantzakis the author of "the last temptation of christ" also posed this question..and was excommunicated for it..
would jesus have been able to keep his integrity if he had sired a child?
Why not wasn't he human after all. A man like any other. and there is always the question of the lost years? Maybe he was being a husband and a father?
The question Inferi asks is interesting as it sums up the connotation that has been rampant in the church for almost two mellinia - IS SEX "BAD" or SINFUL?
Come on! Goddess religions viewed sex as powerful and good. Therefore the masculine ruled "church" had to make it bad.
So it follows that to lay women low Mary Magdelane is villified, goddess religions are "WITCHCRAFT", Sex is EVIL and Christ could NEVER EVER have a child. Although it is VERY unusual for any Jewish man NOT to marry and have a family- especially during those "traditional" times.
Christ is a product of the early church. The man behind the myth has long been hidden.
Well said minamurray. I definately agree. What about the gospels of Judas as well as the Gospel of mary that have been hidden or considered fakes?
Good post mina,and now I read others post,so the protests are everywhere am not surprised.
Like images said it's not going to change me.
People make a fuss about the smallest things.
I haven't gotten a chance to either read the book or watch the movie yet..
But, I will, soon.
And I just wanted to state that there was a bus full of boycotters at a local theatre the night I went to watch another movie, which is rediculous..
i haven't seen it yet or read the book but i hope to do both soon.
i went to check out see no evil ( which was very good ) insead of the davinci code.... but all the good things i have heard about the davinci code, i am prob gonna see it this weekend..........
I own the book, but haven't read it yet. I'm still working through reading my Stephen King collection. I do want to see the movie though. I think it's a bit sad that some people just can't distinguish fact from fiction. Which I think is the cause of the protests. What they can't see is this is a film that is meant to be entertaining, not educational.
I guess I should've answered the original question, huh? =)
I'm not too sure if it makes Jesus less miraculous or not, but I'm sure some will think it does..
well, if he had a son or child, then that must have been one popular kid in class. One of the best pick-up lines ever..."Hi, I'm the son of the child of God..."
I absolutely guarantee if this devolves into a jesus bashing thread, it will be closed. That would be a shame because I do believe there are people both on this thread, and on this site that understand the issues. As I and Mina pointed out...well hmm..maybe it was just Mina, I'm tipsy...but anyway...Jesus, as a historical figure was a Rabbi, and it, in fact, would have contradicted dogma for him NOT to be married; of course there is the issue that Jesus wasn't even deified until the meeting of the council of Nicine (sp?) so y'all get the picture....A LOT of HOLES...but the same can be said of any major religion; we should all try to be nice.
I absolutely loved the book! Still haven't seen the film! Tickets have been sold out at the local cinema. Cough *Goes to download it* Cough cough
I read the book, unfortunately i've no still had time to go to watch the movie, i should go this weekend- at least i hope so. The books is really interesting, nice thesis and a good mix with thriller... about the protests it's absurd, as absurd was the church behaviour towards this matter, if they didn't want people to read the book they got the opposite effect...
i believe this movie and z book both ring more accurate than the church could ever be. And the church is in a panic about it. That is exciting. The church near my house has a sign that says that the davinci code is false. I think that it is hilarious. But I have yet to see z movie, i will go see it.
Shameless plug
I'm gonna watch it again tomorrow, together with X-men 3. Haha!
Just check again if there's some part I missed. Though I think it's STILL bland.
i went last night to watch the film
thought it was brilliant
well what i can say about Davinci Code That many shots where done here in Malta yes i could say that which is true that the Maltese Chruch was the only one to accept it becouse they belief we should think of our beliefs and be strong in what we belife. all of the above is true what i say is is not a film or a book how makes the man but is the man how makes the book. for those how thosen't know roman bible which we belief is to be the proper one . was forme and published by the first pope in 176 after christ due to the fact that there where many books around and many poeple where creating there own religion. therefore please don't base everythign you think on this movie/book and niether ignor it. if it's true jesus was still a good man and he did many good thinks ( this is writing inthe book of roman empire which they use to make a log of everything )
N.B. sorry for my english i am half asleep tired.
the book was most likely better ive yet to see the movie
I went to see the movie the other night and it was fantastic, rarely do I sit through a movie that holds my interest as well.
I think that even if Jesus had bore a child it would not have made him less of what he was supposed to be in the bible, but more. I mean... what bigger miracle is man capable of than creating life?
I went to see it on sunday i thought it was ok but i didnt like it that much because theirs to much subtitles in it and it goes on for to long and it made me confussed. But over all i think it was a good film. And i know what you mean iv never seen so mant people go it to see a film
i read the book and loved it; and the prequel to it called "angels & demons" i thought was even better - hopefully someday they make that book into a movie as well. going to see davinci code tonight hopefully. i'm not really paying attention to the negative reviews its been getting in the press, if i want to see a movie, i don't let anyone influence me against it. i prefer to form my own opinions. judging from what most people on our site have said, it sounds awesome anyways! looking forward to it!
I haven't seen the movie yet but i am about to finish the book and its great. Angels and Demons was just as good. But the books do make you think about things!!!!!!!!
You know everyone in the christian / catholic circles has been positively rabid about this film and while I've read the book and did see the film (good job that), I think most people missed the real unspoken bombshell.
No one can say for sure about Jesus and Mary and anything remotely definitive about that supposed scandal. However, the Council of Nicea is a matter of historical record and seems to underscore the idea that the bible was drastically vetted, edited and arranged by men with agendas. I'm surprised that it's mention didn't ruffle a few more feathers.
If you are interested he has wrote several books and of course the famous court case his new book the The Jesus Papers looks good i must say and i think he is plugging it now............
Link
I agree with Cancer, this stuff has been done over and over again.
I'm thinking about going to see the movie, just for something to do.
I gave up on fiction as well, I stick to factual books.
Is the movie atleast entertaining?
I'm sure hoping it is. I've had a couple of friends who have seen it and they enjoyed it. I want to see the movie and I'm going in with no expectations other than something to kill a couple of hours that has some intrigue and action. If it has that then I'm happy.
Personally, I watched the movie yeasterday and I loved it. I noticed the few things Ron Howard changed in the film, and I still liked it. I do not care if it's fiction, just theories, or the full blown truth. I liked how Dan Brown pulled it all together in the book and I have read all his books except for Deception pointAnd I can not wait until his new book comes out called The Soloman Key Also a book with the character John Langdon in it. Did you know that that character was based on an actual Harverd Symbologist, Who also made the symbols for Brown's Book Angels and Demons I loved that book, Digital Fortress So far was good but it ended weakly. ^^ I like his works is all I have to say and I enjoyed the movie alot.
I am a historian. (See profile regarding History PhD plans.)
Yes, the subject matter has been covered before, but what is startling about this book is how it weaves that hidden "history" with factual evidence and has created something, which has resulted in a serious "re-thinking" of the Gnostic Gospels and the Council of Nicea (that's the correct spelling Sevenn).
"The Last Temptation of Christ" - while a good film - was set in the past and the subject matter was so controversial it was also "condemned,” but it lacked the spark needed to really get people talking and thinking. I remember when the movie came out and it seemed that it was hyped as mostly a "sexual" film and that doesn't speak well across generations and lifestyles. Besides, when "Last Temptation" was released there was no Internet to promote its theory.
"Dogma" was just too comedic for the Church to take seriously.
The DaVinci Code has made this theoretical information truly accessible to a wide range of people and may very well be the catalyst, which starts the change within our "industrialized" world.
The world has been in turmoil over this "religion" for MELLINIA. It is high time that the disingenuousness of the church is exposed and faith is re-examined for some sort of truth.
I think that every ideology has its time. It is time for us humans to question the conditions under which we live and re-examine the foundations of our faith.
I have hopes that the world will change for the better. I am not holding my breath - but despite the "meh" attitude that many take towards this movie and book - no one can deny that it has started a dialogue, which has rapidly gained momentum.
The DaVinci Code has been in the right place at the right time. I am glad that I am not the only person anymore to understand what has been “occult” thinking about these theories. One used to have to have a history degree to get this information.
|
Cartomancer Arch Sire (194) Posts: 1,252 Honor: 31,091 [ Give / Take ] |
I have heard that a few areas of the movie were pretty 'off' and sensationalized- in reference to a National Geographic documentary I watched. And I also learned that this book- much of it was taken from a few other book's ideas. If you see 'Da Vinci's Code' on the National Geographic TV lineup, you should check it out.
I read the book. I didnt see the movie cuz I really dont like movies to much. The point of the book;the bloodline of Christ is definatly an intersting one. I agree it would make Him no less miraculas. On the conrary. Ibelieve it would make him more so, for the simple fact that his children would also be devine.
You are correct, Cancer, about the theory of Jesus and Mary's union being around for ages - since the start of Christianity to be frank.
However, regarding the Council of Nicea - here is a link to what history tells us happened there: I am not going to cut and paste this lengthy info here (laugh).
If anyone wants to read what happened at the Council see this link:
Council of Nicea
As I understand it - the Council of Nicae was not where the canon was created or ratified - that came later.
I think Dogma is a great film by the way. And LTOC stars my favorite actor! Gotta love Willem Dafoe. :)
But no one can deny that Dan Brown's work had brought this theory to the forefront of world consciousness and this is something neither of the other two films was able to really do - strike a chord in the minds of the masses.
Happy Reading.
I misspoke. I confused the Council of Nicea with the Council of Jamnia (circa 90 AD). It is at Jamnia that the Rabi's selected the books of the old testament. Nicea was of course, entirely a catholic affair.
The thing that makes Dogma a great movie is that despite being a comedy, it is incredibly well researched. There's little about that movie that I can argue against.
Last temptation was visionary in that it showed Judas to be Jesus's best friend, and that it was indeed Jesus that asked Judas to betray him. These assertions are becoming more widely accepted today.
Thanks, Cancer - I misspoke too (laugh).
I am thinking of when the Gnostic Gospels were declared heretical which was later than the either of the Councils we refer to - I am not fresh on this - but think it was when the Cathars were persecuted (???) that the Gnostic Gospels were buried or hidden.
(My "area" of history up unitl I recently has been Western Civ from 1890-1945 mainly focusing on anti-semitism and the Holocaust.)
You're awesome, Prince!
Haven't read the book (not a big reader if its not a ref or simialer) but i am looking forward to seeing the film shortly, all these +ve remarks just adds to the anticipation!!
Most of the reviews say that the davinci code was a waste of money and that the actor's were shit...but my mates went to see it and they said it was excellent. so i hope to see it soon and judge for myself!
I find It interesting how so many "gospels " were left out because they disproved major religions version of the truth but we are supposed to believe
I have not read the book or seen the movie. I plan to do both.
imagesinwords: I know many church's that are encouraging people to see it and a few that will be holding discussion groups about it.
i can proudly say i got thrown off the set at one of the uk locations,
bet you cant guess where???
i am the pride of my country...!
*admin, please add link to Gesar's post,
thread is hard to read. tia.*
I'm gonna watch it tonight, I'm not a Tom Hanks fan really but I'm fascinated by the plot.
Good points Billy. I have always told my daughter when reading the New Testament - only read the "red words" - it gives the Bible a whole different meaning.
I've heard mixed reviews about the movie, but I'm still looking forward to seeing it for myself. I've been told the book is excellant, but have neglected reading it. For those that have been able to enjoy both, does the movie really do the book justice?
Does any movie ever really do a book justice?
This movie is good, I think. It follows the book pretty well and stays faithful to it. It is rather dialogue heavy though. I think it may be better if the book has been read - but it isn't necessary, as it can stand on its own.
Still - reading is always better. Tom Hanks was not whom I imagined Robert Langdon to be - but he did a great job as always.
Well I hear they were looking at Russell Crowe - he is more the age I thought Langdon should be...
but I would have liked to see a new person - or maybe someone like Patrick Dempsey - that age and looks!
Tom is great - just a bit older than I thought Langdon should be - but he pulled it off beautifully as he always does.
that would be cool,russel crowe is one of my fav actors
I had to deal with Christian Protesters outside the theatre, I mean it was just a book. But some took it to heart way to much.
I have yet to watch the movie but I do beleave it is on my list of things to do this weekend.
well I have never read the book nor have I seen the movie but I plan to see the movie soon.
Hmm, I found the Movie fell WAY a short of the book. I also feel that the movie was unsatisfactory. Not a bad movie, but not good either.
All-in-all, if you want to see it, go.
but if your thinking on waiting, then please do.
I haven't seen the movie yet but did read the book and greatly enjoyed it.
I know that this book is a fictional book with some truths throughout it but I love the way it has people talking.
In Dogma, they mentioned Mary and Joesph having kids and that's where the blood line came from (which, if you haven't seen this movie, run out and do so!) The movie also talks about how we should celebrate our faith, not mourn it and how humans got it all wrong...
It doesn't matter what faith you have, just that you have faith
This is why I love all the talking that this movie is causing. People talk and open their eyes to a whole world of misconceptions and lies.
If all this book/movie does is make people more open-minded, then I think everyone should see and read it.
The original idea behind Christ having to have been a virgin is that the catholic church conciders sex a sin, whether it is in the confines of marriage or not.. that is silly seeing as how we are created for it and commanded in the garden to be fruitful but anyways.. the idea was that if he had known Mary or anyone in the biblical sense that he would have been defiled and therefor his crucifixion would have done us no good.
Just soo the film yesterday and in my personal opion there is a lot to belive if you don't have a strong faith in what you do belive but the rest it's a very nice film beside even if gd had to havea child well the actions taken by him to help others are still good and that's what is relavant at the end of the day.
|
Cartomancer Arch Sire (194) Posts: 1,252 Honor: 31,091 [ Give / Take ] |
Actually the idea of Jesus being a virgin has nothing to do with the Catholic Church. The Bible was pre-Catholcism.
well i think that it is a good book and the movie looks good. and my friend sex that it was good.
i think you should try and read holy blood holy grail...the book before da vinci code...
Well jesus was a real man as Mstjuan has stated...It is fact....God is not!!
Alot of the lost gospels were destroyed by the catholic church,they also tried to destroy alot of the older religions but failed with a few.....Oh yes a group of men a very long time ago decided to put forward to a largely uneducated people what there idea of religion was....lets just say that the people were conned..pity the fool!
Yes what jesus was tryng to teach was to have faith..... not in being catholic,or church of england or muslim..ect...ect
I have the book have not seen the film yet...very good read,cant wait to see the film.
I am looking foward to going to see the movie this is one I will watch at the theatre I usually wait for the dvd. I enjoyed the book and all the controversy over it.
I want to read the book befor i see the movie........ But truthfully i will end up seeing the movie first....
It's been the same way for me. I bought the book but haven't yet read it. I know i'll see the movie before I actually read the book, but at least I'll get to compare what hollywood changed to the text.
I can see why the catholic church was up set , cause yet again a film show how the church is just money grabbing tc
Dont really beleive in the whole thing, sorry if that makes anyone mad
I've read the book and seen the movie. Even though the movie doesn't begin to cover everything in the book, Ron Howard did a great job of pulling it all together and keeping the flow. I know that everyone thinks that Tom Hanks was wrong for the part but he was perfect. Robert Langdon was scholarly with a dry sense of humor which makes Tom Hanks perfect. The rest of the cast was perfectly selected as well.
I do not know what it is I have against this movie. I never read the book, never felt even the slightest inclination to do so (which is amazing because I read anything I can get my hands on) and just the thought of going to see that movie makes me angry. Weird. I really do not even know what it is I dislike about it, I barely know what it's about. Ah well, I'd rather stay home and read something else.
Just got back from seeing the movie it was very good.Still like the book better.
I haven't seen it, but my parents want to see it so I'll prolly go see it.
I cant wait to see it, never read the book tho, i think i do so soon as im done reading the one i am tho cant wait to see the movie too. :)
It was a good book/movie and I am sorry the idiots protesting are just being stupid.If it says it will change beliefs by seeing it then they must not have strong beliefs.
the idiots protesting the movi are they hiding anything good question ? and Y are they ?
I loved the book and am going next week to see the movie. So, what is Christ fathered children? He is still Jesus.
I dont really think much would change except for some super religious people you know but i think it would be awsome if it was true and he did have children like they say! i'm reading the book now and i saw the movie but it still makes you think it is a high possibility that we might not ever know about!
I have just been to see the film and really enjoyed it, Im not a believer in God, but i know that Jesus did exsit and I and think its quite possible that he had a child,
at the end of the day, its a film... a story... we dont know what really happened and probably never will... unless there is something someone wants to share ;)
I have heard mixed feelings on the movie. From some I heard it is really good, but from others I heard that it was just way too long to sit through. I haven't seen it yet myself. I haven't really even decided if I want to yet.
Hey Scarlett!
I went to see the movie a couple of days ago, It was awesome, like seeing the book unfold before your eyes. The director, Ron Howard, did a terrific job in depicting the movie.
Although, yes, the book is indeed far better than the movie.
It was awesome, 5 stars for this one.
♥ DB
i would like to see this movie. it looks good. never read the book though
I suggest and strongly recommend reading the book first. You will have more pleasure when watching the movie than just watching it and not knowing what its all about :)
I haven't had the chance to see the movie yet but I have read the book and I loved it this whole concept of a living decendent of "jesus" its kind of interesting
Why wouldn't we hold high a man with such powers, even though he bared a child?
We can worship material things such as money, why not?
He did what he did, regardless of his sin.
Well as it was said there are many and many theories but i like to belive thhat the soul is jst a part of our mind that control the energy inside of us ....and that after our hysial body dies our energy goes to the earth which will become one .....
have not seen the movie but i am gonna have to i don't see why it matters so much if the man had a son or not he will forever be in my heart and mind. i was taught to never question another question
I throughly enjoyed reding the book.
The film also has been taken well. But when compared to the joy the book gave me......... The movie failed the magic it promised.
Have not seen the movie yet, but after all I have heard about it I can't wait to see it.
the book was absolutly amazing! it had me on the edge of my seat.. havent seen the movie yet... herd it wasent as good.
i dont know mutch of the book is real... but i do know chistians were not the first religion and the did steal eveything from other religions... and i believe the bloodline thing..it makes sense... but than again i also love how they describe Jesus as not "The Son Of God" i agree with most of Dan Brown's points...
oh and about the movie...
is it me or did anyone else picture Sophie to be a very creative type person who didnt wear a business suit? =/
when i read the book i veiwed her as being very different from other people.. yet in the movie cover (not yet seen the movie..) she looked completly different from the picture i got in my mind.
anyone else see her that way?
I thought the film was very intriguing and exciting but I haven't read the book before. I must say that I wasn't too surprised by the ending, though. It was somehow predictable it just took a good guess....
AND SO WHAT IS JESUS DID HAVE A CHILD?....MMMM SO WHAT?. I COULD'CARE LESS ABOUT THAT. NOTHING IS GOING TO CHANGE IN MY LIFE IF HE DID OR NOT....I DON'T SEE HOW PEOPLE STILL BELIEVE IN THAT FABLE OF MIRACLES AND VIRGINITIES AND IT'S PRETTY OBVIOUS THAT JESUS IS NOT GOD'S SON BUT A MERE MORTAL WITH A LOT TO SAY.
I am loving the book, and I see so much truth in it. I can't wait to see the movie.
Bought the book recently but haven't got round to reading it yet, although from all your reviews I think I'll enjoy it and no doubt the movie too!
wow wht a movie i really loved it.it was a perfect presentation of the book.i dont thr is ne thing wrong with the movie.
Could not put the book down! It was a fun read.
I liked the movie but had a hard time with Tom Hanks as Langdon. Ian was great at 'the bad guy" as usual.
I was glad I had read teh book so long ago. I forgot how it ended so it was a surprise all over again.

as of yet, i havent had a chance to read the book or see the movie.
My friends have all said very good things about both and when i have time to start reading the book i will but i dont know if i should read the book first or see the movie first????
I finished reading the book a little over a month ago. I loved it! I can't wait to see the movie.
I am reading a book by the author Simon Cox called Breaking the Davinci Code.
If you are done reading the book I would HIGHLY recomend reading this! It gives a lot of background information about certain things in the book. A lot of neat facts I didn't know.
I can't wait to see the movie. I am a fan of Tom Hanks. He is an excellent actor.
I finally watched the movie some week ago.
I loved it.
Most criticised it where I live,cause the book is more detailed.
Erm yes but that's the point of a movie,to shorten a story it's impossibile to make a whole book in one movie.
Anyway I loved it and I'll read the book someday.
I was aslo suggested to read Angels and Demons it is about what happened before the DA Vinci Code.
I read the book and loved it, but right now i'm in a position to where I can't see the movie. This sucks. I also heard about the protesters because the books go against Christian teaching and I also heard about the lawsuit against the author from a guy claiming that he stole his material. There's a lot of controversy swirling around this one little book. It's amazing how people in today's society take little things like books as insults
i have read the book and seen the movie. i loved both. If they think this one was bad the cathlic church is going to go nuts when they read Angles and Demons. it is also great
I've read the book, plus I have seen the movie. The book had more details to it which I perfer over the movie.
Both were great. I actually thought that the movie would not have been all that good. It was a surprise to see that it was.
I would recommend anyone to see the movie and read the book.
I loved the book, but the movie didn't stay as close to the story as I had hoped. I know this always happens, but I was hoping.
I really liked the book, but I don't think that the movie went as deep as the book did...
hmmm ive heard about this but never saw it or read it doesnt seem in my interest at all.